Cargando…

Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle

Reliably identifying breed proportions in crossbred cattle in smallholder farms is a crucial step to improve mating decisions and optimizing management in these systems. High‐density genotype information is able to estimate higher‐order breed proportions accurately, but, are too expensive for mass a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strucken, Eva M., Swaminathan, Marimuthu, Gibson, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12544
_version_ 1784584393662136320
author Strucken, Eva M.
Swaminathan, Marimuthu
Gibson, John P.
author_facet Strucken, Eva M.
Swaminathan, Marimuthu
Gibson, John P.
author_sort Strucken, Eva M.
collection PubMed
description Reliably identifying breed proportions in crossbred cattle in smallholder farms is a crucial step to improve mating decisions and optimizing management in these systems. High‐density genotype information is able to estimate higher‐order breed proportions accurately, but, are too expensive for mass application in smallholder systems. We used high‐density genotype information (777 k SNPs) of 623 crossbred cattle from India that had Holstein‐Friesian (HFX) and/or Jersey and indigenous breeds in their ancestry to select a smaller number of SNPs for breed proportion estimation. The accuracy of estimates obtained from panels with 100–500 SNP was compared to estimates based on all SNPs. Panels were selected for highest absolute allele frequency difference between exotic dairy versus indigenous Bos indicus, or between HFX versus Jersey breeds. A step‐wise pruning approach was developed showing that and increased physical distances between markers of 8.5 Mb improved breed proportion estimation compared to a standard 1 Mb distance. A panel of 500 SNPs optimized to estimate HFX versus Jersey versus indicine ancestry was able to estimate indicine breed proportions with r (2) = .991, HFX proportions with r (2) = .979 and Jersey proportions with r (2) = .949. The number of markers was a deciding factor in estimation accuracy, together with the distribution of markers across the genome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85191562021-10-22 Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle Strucken, Eva M. Swaminathan, Marimuthu Gibson, John P. J Anim Breed Genet Original Articles Reliably identifying breed proportions in crossbred cattle in smallholder farms is a crucial step to improve mating decisions and optimizing management in these systems. High‐density genotype information is able to estimate higher‐order breed proportions accurately, but, are too expensive for mass application in smallholder systems. We used high‐density genotype information (777 k SNPs) of 623 crossbred cattle from India that had Holstein‐Friesian (HFX) and/or Jersey and indigenous breeds in their ancestry to select a smaller number of SNPs for breed proportion estimation. The accuracy of estimates obtained from panels with 100–500 SNP was compared to estimates based on all SNPs. Panels were selected for highest absolute allele frequency difference between exotic dairy versus indigenous Bos indicus, or between HFX versus Jersey breeds. A step‐wise pruning approach was developed showing that and increased physical distances between markers of 8.5 Mb improved breed proportion estimation compared to a standard 1 Mb distance. A panel of 500 SNPs optimized to estimate HFX versus Jersey versus indicine ancestry was able to estimate indicine breed proportions with r (2) = .991, HFX proportions with r (2) = .979 and Jersey proportions with r (2) = .949. The number of markers was a deciding factor in estimation accuracy, together with the distribution of markers across the genome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8519156/ /pubmed/33687116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12544 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Strucken, Eva M.
Swaminathan, Marimuthu
Gibson, John P.
Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title_full Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title_fullStr Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title_full_unstemmed Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title_short Small SNP panels for breed proportion estimation in Indian crossbred dairy cattle
title_sort small snp panels for breed proportion estimation in indian crossbred dairy cattle
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12544
work_keys_str_mv AT struckenevam smallsnppanelsforbreedproportionestimationinindiancrossbreddairycattle
AT swaminathanmarimuthu smallsnppanelsforbreedproportionestimationinindiancrossbreddairycattle
AT gibsonjohnp smallsnppanelsforbreedproportionestimationinindiancrossbreddairycattle