Cargando…
The “Real R0”: A Resection Margin Smaller Than 0.1 cm is Associated with a Poor Prognosis After Oncologic Esophagectomy
BACKGROUND: Although resection margin (R) status is a widely used prognostic factor after esophagectomy, the definition of positive margins (R1) is not universal. The Royal College of Pathologists considers R1 resection to be a distance less than 0.1 cm, whereas the College of American Pathologists...
Autores principales: | St-Amour, Penelope, Winiker, Michael, Sempoux, Christine, Fasquelle, François, Demartines, Nicolas, Schäfer, Markus, Mantziari, Styliani |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10121-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
ASO Author Reflections: R0 Resection After Oncologic Esophagectomy—Cutting on the Edge (0 cm) is Not Enough
por: St-Amour, Penelope, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection Versus Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinomas Smaller Than 3 cm: Analysis of Treatment Outcomes Using Propensity Score Matching
por: Ko, Seong Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
(18)F- FDG PET/CT-derived parameters predict clinical stage and prognosis of esophageal cancer
por: Mantziari, Styliani, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Comprehensive Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma
por: Mantziari, Styliani, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment
por: Goense, Lucas, et al.
Publicado: (2017)