Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based tools are necessary for scientifically improving the way MTBs work. Such tools are available but can be difficult to use. This study aimed to develop a robust observational assessment tool for use on cancer multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) by health care professionals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamb, B. W., Miah, S., Skolarus, T. A., Stewart, G. D., Green, J. S. A., Sevdalis, N., Soukup, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7
_version_ 1784584536909152256
author Lamb, B. W.
Miah, S.
Skolarus, T. A.
Stewart, G. D.
Green, J. S. A.
Sevdalis, N.
Soukup, T.
author_facet Lamb, B. W.
Miah, S.
Skolarus, T. A.
Stewart, G. D.
Green, J. S. A.
Sevdalis, N.
Soukup, T.
author_sort Lamb, B. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based tools are necessary for scientifically improving the way MTBs work. Such tools are available but can be difficult to use. This study aimed to develop a robust observational assessment tool for use on cancer multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) by health care professionals in everyday practice. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the United Kingdom from September 2015 to July 2016. Three tumor boards from three teaching hospitals were recruited, with 44 members overall. Six weekly meetings involving 146 consecutive cases were video-recorded and scored using the validated MODe tool. Data were subjected to reliability and validity analysis in the current study to develop a shorter version of the MODe. RESULTS: Phase 1, a reduction of the original items in the MODe, was achieved through two focus group meetings with expert assessors based on previous research. The 12 original items were reduced to 6 domains, receiving full agreement by the assessors. In phase 2, the six domains were subjected to item reliability, convergent validation, and internal consistency testing against the MODe-Lite global score, the MODe global score, and the items of the MODe. Significant positive correlations were evident across all domains (p < 0.01), indicating good reliability and validity. In phase 3, feasibility and high inter-assessor reliability were achieved by two clinical assessors. Six domains measuring clinical input, holistic input, clinical collaboration, pathology, radiology, and management plan were integrated into MODe-Lite. CONCLUSIONS: As an evidence-based tool for health care professionals in everyday practice, MODe-Lite gives cancer MTBs insight into the way they work and facilitates improvements in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85198352021-10-29 Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite Lamb, B. W. Miah, S. Skolarus, T. A. Stewart, G. D. Green, J. S. A. Sevdalis, N. Soukup, T. Ann Surg Oncol Global Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based tools are necessary for scientifically improving the way MTBs work. Such tools are available but can be difficult to use. This study aimed to develop a robust observational assessment tool for use on cancer multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) by health care professionals in everyday practice. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the United Kingdom from September 2015 to July 2016. Three tumor boards from three teaching hospitals were recruited, with 44 members overall. Six weekly meetings involving 146 consecutive cases were video-recorded and scored using the validated MODe tool. Data were subjected to reliability and validity analysis in the current study to develop a shorter version of the MODe. RESULTS: Phase 1, a reduction of the original items in the MODe, was achieved through two focus group meetings with expert assessors based on previous research. The 12 original items were reduced to 6 domains, receiving full agreement by the assessors. In phase 2, the six domains were subjected to item reliability, convergent validation, and internal consistency testing against the MODe-Lite global score, the MODe global score, and the items of the MODe. Significant positive correlations were evident across all domains (p < 0.01), indicating good reliability and validity. In phase 3, feasibility and high inter-assessor reliability were achieved by two clinical assessors. Six domains measuring clinical input, holistic input, clinical collaboration, pathology, radiology, and management plan were integrated into MODe-Lite. CONCLUSIONS: As an evidence-based tool for health care professionals in everyday practice, MODe-Lite gives cancer MTBs insight into the way they work and facilitates improvements in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8519835/ /pubmed/33974197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Global Health Services Research
Lamb, B. W.
Miah, S.
Skolarus, T. A.
Stewart, G. D.
Green, J. S. A.
Sevdalis, N.
Soukup, T.
Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title_full Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title_short Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: MODe-Lite
title_sort development and validation of a short version of the metric for the observation of decision-making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: mode-lite
topic Global Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lambbw developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT miahs developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT skolarusta developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT stewartgd developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT greenjsa developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT sevdalisn developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite
AT soukupt developmentandvalidationofashortversionofthemetricfortheobservationofdecisionmakinginmultidisciplinarytumorboardsmodelite