Cargando…

Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation

With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Heng, Sun, Weiqian, Zhang, Jianxu, Yan, Zilong, Wang, Chenyu, Wang, Luyao, Liu, Tiantian, Li, Chunlin, Chen, Duanduan, Shintaro, Funahashi, Wu, Jinglong, Yan, Tianyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622
_version_ 1784584544028983296
author Wang, Heng
Sun, Weiqian
Zhang, Jianxu
Yan, Zilong
Wang, Chenyu
Wang, Luyao
Liu, Tiantian
Li, Chunlin
Chen, Duanduan
Shintaro, Funahashi
Wu, Jinglong
Yan, Tianyi
author_facet Wang, Heng
Sun, Weiqian
Zhang, Jianxu
Yan, Zilong
Wang, Chenyu
Wang, Luyao
Liu, Tiantian
Li, Chunlin
Chen, Duanduan
Shintaro, Funahashi
Wu, Jinglong
Yan, Tianyi
author_sort Wang, Heng
collection PubMed
description With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simulation prediction because of its large role in dispersing current. In this study, we simulated different frequencies of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TI stimulation in single‐layer and layered skull model, compared the electric field via error parameters such as the relative difference measure and relative magnification factor. Pearson correlation analysis and t‐test were used to measure the differences in envelope amplitude. The results showed that the intensity of electric field in the brain generated by per unit of stimulation current will increase with current frequency, and the layered skull model had a better response to frequency. An obvious pattern difference was found between the electric fields of the layered and single‐layer skull individualized models. For TI stimulation, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the envelope distribution of the layered skull model and the single‐layer skull was only 0.746 in the individualized model, which is clearly lower than the correlation coefficient of 0.999 determined from the spherical model. Higher carrier frequencies seemed to be easier to generate a large enough brain electric field envelope in TI stimulation. In conclusion, we recommend using layered skull models instead of single‐layer skull models in tCS (particularly TI stimulation) simulation studies in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction of stimulus intensity and stimulus target.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85198672021-10-22 Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation Wang, Heng Sun, Weiqian Zhang, Jianxu Yan, Zilong Wang, Chenyu Wang, Luyao Liu, Tiantian Li, Chunlin Chen, Duanduan Shintaro, Funahashi Wu, Jinglong Yan, Tianyi Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simulation prediction because of its large role in dispersing current. In this study, we simulated different frequencies of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TI stimulation in single‐layer and layered skull model, compared the electric field via error parameters such as the relative difference measure and relative magnification factor. Pearson correlation analysis and t‐test were used to measure the differences in envelope amplitude. The results showed that the intensity of electric field in the brain generated by per unit of stimulation current will increase with current frequency, and the layered skull model had a better response to frequency. An obvious pattern difference was found between the electric fields of the layered and single‐layer skull individualized models. For TI stimulation, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the envelope distribution of the layered skull model and the single‐layer skull was only 0.746 in the individualized model, which is clearly lower than the correlation coefficient of 0.999 determined from the spherical model. Higher carrier frequencies seemed to be easier to generate a large enough brain electric field envelope in TI stimulation. In conclusion, we recommend using layered skull models instead of single‐layer skull models in tCS (particularly TI stimulation) simulation studies in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction of stimulus intensity and stimulus target. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8519867/ /pubmed/34390079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wang, Heng
Sun, Weiqian
Zhang, Jianxu
Yan, Zilong
Wang, Chenyu
Wang, Luyao
Liu, Tiantian
Li, Chunlin
Chen, Duanduan
Shintaro, Funahashi
Wu, Jinglong
Yan, Tianyi
Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title_full Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title_fullStr Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title_short Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
title_sort influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622
work_keys_str_mv AT wangheng influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT sunweiqian influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT zhangjianxu influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT yanzilong influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT wangchenyu influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT wangluyao influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT liutiantian influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT lichunlin influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT chenduanduan influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT shintarofunahashi influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT wujinglong influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation
AT yantianyi influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation