Cargando…
Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation
With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622 |
_version_ | 1784584544028983296 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Heng Sun, Weiqian Zhang, Jianxu Yan, Zilong Wang, Chenyu Wang, Luyao Liu, Tiantian Li, Chunlin Chen, Duanduan Shintaro, Funahashi Wu, Jinglong Yan, Tianyi |
author_facet | Wang, Heng Sun, Weiqian Zhang, Jianxu Yan, Zilong Wang, Chenyu Wang, Luyao Liu, Tiantian Li, Chunlin Chen, Duanduan Shintaro, Funahashi Wu, Jinglong Yan, Tianyi |
author_sort | Wang, Heng |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simulation prediction because of its large role in dispersing current. In this study, we simulated different frequencies of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TI stimulation in single‐layer and layered skull model, compared the electric field via error parameters such as the relative difference measure and relative magnification factor. Pearson correlation analysis and t‐test were used to measure the differences in envelope amplitude. The results showed that the intensity of electric field in the brain generated by per unit of stimulation current will increase with current frequency, and the layered skull model had a better response to frequency. An obvious pattern difference was found between the electric fields of the layered and single‐layer skull individualized models. For TI stimulation, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the envelope distribution of the layered skull model and the single‐layer skull was only 0.746 in the individualized model, which is clearly lower than the correlation coefficient of 0.999 determined from the spherical model. Higher carrier frequencies seemed to be easier to generate a large enough brain electric field envelope in TI stimulation. In conclusion, we recommend using layered skull models instead of single‐layer skull models in tCS (particularly TI stimulation) simulation studies in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction of stimulus intensity and stimulus target. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8519867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85198672021-10-22 Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation Wang, Heng Sun, Weiqian Zhang, Jianxu Yan, Zilong Wang, Chenyu Wang, Luyao Liu, Tiantian Li, Chunlin Chen, Duanduan Shintaro, Funahashi Wu, Jinglong Yan, Tianyi Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles With the development of electrical stimulation technology, especially the emergence of temporally interfering (TI) stimulation, it is necessary to discuss the influence of current frequency on stimulation intensity. Accurate skull modeling is important for transcranial current stimulation (tCS) simulation prediction because of its large role in dispersing current. In this study, we simulated different frequencies of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and TI stimulation in single‐layer and layered skull model, compared the electric field via error parameters such as the relative difference measure and relative magnification factor. Pearson correlation analysis and t‐test were used to measure the differences in envelope amplitude. The results showed that the intensity of electric field in the brain generated by per unit of stimulation current will increase with current frequency, and the layered skull model had a better response to frequency. An obvious pattern difference was found between the electric fields of the layered and single‐layer skull individualized models. For TI stimulation, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the envelope distribution of the layered skull model and the single‐layer skull was only 0.746 in the individualized model, which is clearly lower than the correlation coefficient of 0.999 determined from the spherical model. Higher carrier frequencies seemed to be easier to generate a large enough brain electric field envelope in TI stimulation. In conclusion, we recommend using layered skull models instead of single‐layer skull models in tCS (particularly TI stimulation) simulation studies in order to improve the accuracy of the prediction of stimulus intensity and stimulus target. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8519867/ /pubmed/34390079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Wang, Heng Sun, Weiqian Zhang, Jianxu Yan, Zilong Wang, Chenyu Wang, Luyao Liu, Tiantian Li, Chunlin Chen, Duanduan Shintaro, Funahashi Wu, Jinglong Yan, Tianyi Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title | Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title_full | Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title_fullStr | Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title_short | Influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
title_sort | influence of layered skull modeling on the frequency sensitivity and target accuracy in simulations of transcranial current stimulation |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangheng influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT sunweiqian influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT zhangjianxu influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT yanzilong influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT wangchenyu influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT wangluyao influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT liutiantian influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT lichunlin influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT chenduanduan influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT shintarofunahashi influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT wujinglong influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation AT yantianyi influenceoflayeredskullmodelingonthefrequencysensitivityandtargetaccuracyinsimulationsoftranscranialcurrentstimulation |