Cargando…

Validation of a German translation of the CARE questionnaire and its implementation as electronic PROM to assess patient-reported postoperative convalescence and recovery after major urological surgery

PURPOSE: To validate a German translation of the convalescence and recovery evaluation (CARE) as an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) and use it to assess recovery after major urological surgery. METHODS: The CARE questionnaire was provided to patients scheduled for major urologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wessels, Frederik, Lenhart, Maximilian, Neuberger, Manuel, Mühlbauer, Julia, Huber, Johannes, Breyer, Johannes, Nuhn, Philipp, Michel, Maurice S., Koenig, Julian, Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03713-6
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To validate a German translation of the convalescence and recovery evaluation (CARE) as an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) and use it to assess recovery after major urological surgery. METHODS: The CARE questionnaire was provided to patients scheduled for major urological surgery preoperatively, at discharge and 6 weeks postoperatively, using an ePROM system. Cronbach’s alpha, inter-scale correlations and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to validate the translation. Mixed linear regression models were used to identify factors influencing CARE results, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to determine the predictive value of CARE results on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 283 patients undergoing prostatectomy (n = 146, 51%), partial/radical nephrectomy (n = 70, 25%) or cystectomy (n = 67, 24%) responded to the survey. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.649–0.920) and the CFA showed a factor loading > 0.5 in 17/27 items. Significant main effects were found for the time of survey and type of surgery, while a time by type interaction was only found for the gastrointestinal subscale ([Formula: see text]  = 30.37, p < 0.0001) and the total CARE score (TCS) ([Formula: see text]  = 13.47, p = 0.009) for cystectomy patients, meaning a greater score decrease at discharge and lower level of recovery at follow-up. Complications demonstrated a significant negative effect on the TCS ([Formula: see text]  = 8.61, p = 0.014). A high TCS at discharge was an independent predictor of a high QLQ-C30 QoL score at follow-up (OR = 5.26, 95%-CI 1.42–19.37, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: This German translation of the CARE can serve as a valid ePROM to measure recovery and predict QoL after major urological surgery.