Cargando…

Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study

Microscale thermophoresis (MST), and the closely related Temperature Related Intensity Change (TRIC), are synonyms for a recently developed measurement technique in the field of biophysics to quantify biomolecular interactions, using the (capillary-based) NanoTemper Monolith and (multiwell plate-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Méndez, Blanca, Baron, Bruno, Brautigam, Chad A., Jowitt, Thomas A., Knauer, Stefan H., Uebel, Stephan, Williams, Mark A., Sedivy, Arthur, Abian, Olga, Abreu, Celeste, Adamczyk, Malgorzata, Bal, Wojciech, Berger, Sylvie, Buell, Alexander K., Carolis, Carlo, Daviter, Tina, Fish, Alexander, Garcia-Alai, Maria, Guenther, Christian, Hamacek, Josef, Holková, Jitka, Houser, Josef, Johnson, Chris, Kelly, Sharon, Leech, Andrew, Mas, Caroline, Matulis, Daumantas, McLaughlin, Stephen H., Montserret, Roland, Nasreddine, Rouba, Nehmé, Reine, Nguyen, Quyen, Ortega-Alarcón, David, Perez, Kathryn, Pirc, Katja, Piszczek, Grzegorz, Podobnik, Marjetka, Rodrigo, Natalia, Rokov-Plavec, Jasmina, Schaefer, Susanne, Sharpe, Tim, Southall, June, Staunton, David, Tavares, Pedro, Vanek, Ondrej, Weyand, Michael, Wu, Di
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6
_version_ 1784584552097775616
author López-Méndez, Blanca
Baron, Bruno
Brautigam, Chad A.
Jowitt, Thomas A.
Knauer, Stefan H.
Uebel, Stephan
Williams, Mark A.
Sedivy, Arthur
Abian, Olga
Abreu, Celeste
Adamczyk, Malgorzata
Bal, Wojciech
Berger, Sylvie
Buell, Alexander K.
Carolis, Carlo
Daviter, Tina
Fish, Alexander
Garcia-Alai, Maria
Guenther, Christian
Hamacek, Josef
Holková, Jitka
Houser, Josef
Johnson, Chris
Kelly, Sharon
Leech, Andrew
Mas, Caroline
Matulis, Daumantas
McLaughlin, Stephen H.
Montserret, Roland
Nasreddine, Rouba
Nehmé, Reine
Nguyen, Quyen
Ortega-Alarcón, David
Perez, Kathryn
Pirc, Katja
Piszczek, Grzegorz
Podobnik, Marjetka
Rodrigo, Natalia
Rokov-Plavec, Jasmina
Schaefer, Susanne
Sharpe, Tim
Southall, June
Staunton, David
Tavares, Pedro
Vanek, Ondrej
Weyand, Michael
Wu, Di
author_facet López-Méndez, Blanca
Baron, Bruno
Brautigam, Chad A.
Jowitt, Thomas A.
Knauer, Stefan H.
Uebel, Stephan
Williams, Mark A.
Sedivy, Arthur
Abian, Olga
Abreu, Celeste
Adamczyk, Malgorzata
Bal, Wojciech
Berger, Sylvie
Buell, Alexander K.
Carolis, Carlo
Daviter, Tina
Fish, Alexander
Garcia-Alai, Maria
Guenther, Christian
Hamacek, Josef
Holková, Jitka
Houser, Josef
Johnson, Chris
Kelly, Sharon
Leech, Andrew
Mas, Caroline
Matulis, Daumantas
McLaughlin, Stephen H.
Montserret, Roland
Nasreddine, Rouba
Nehmé, Reine
Nguyen, Quyen
Ortega-Alarcón, David
Perez, Kathryn
Pirc, Katja
Piszczek, Grzegorz
Podobnik, Marjetka
Rodrigo, Natalia
Rokov-Plavec, Jasmina
Schaefer, Susanne
Sharpe, Tim
Southall, June
Staunton, David
Tavares, Pedro
Vanek, Ondrej
Weyand, Michael
Wu, Di
author_sort López-Méndez, Blanca
collection PubMed
description Microscale thermophoresis (MST), and the closely related Temperature Related Intensity Change (TRIC), are synonyms for a recently developed measurement technique in the field of biophysics to quantify biomolecular interactions, using the (capillary-based) NanoTemper Monolith and (multiwell plate-based) Dianthus instruments. Although this technique has been extensively used within the scientific community due to its low sample consumption, ease of use, and ubiquitous applicability, MST/TRIC has not enjoyed the unambiguous acceptance from biophysicists afforded to other biophysical techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) or surface plasmon resonance (SPR). This might be attributed to several facts, e.g., that various (not fully understood) effects are contributing to the signal, that the technique is licensed to only a single instrument developer, NanoTemper Technology, and that its reliability and reproducibility have never been tested independently and systematically. Thus, a working group of ARBRE-MOBIEU has set up a benchmark study on MST/TRIC to assess this technique as a method to characterize biomolecular interactions. Here we present the results of this study involving 32 scientific groups within Europe and two groups from the US, carrying out experiments on 40 Monolith instruments, employing a standard operation procedure and centrally prepared samples. A protein–small molecule interaction, a newly developed protein–protein interaction system and a pure dye were used as test systems. We characterized the instrument properties and evaluated instrument performance, reproducibility, the effect of different analysis tools, the influence of the experimenter during data analysis, and thus the overall reliability of this method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85199052021-10-29 Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study López-Méndez, Blanca Baron, Bruno Brautigam, Chad A. Jowitt, Thomas A. Knauer, Stefan H. Uebel, Stephan Williams, Mark A. Sedivy, Arthur Abian, Olga Abreu, Celeste Adamczyk, Malgorzata Bal, Wojciech Berger, Sylvie Buell, Alexander K. Carolis, Carlo Daviter, Tina Fish, Alexander Garcia-Alai, Maria Guenther, Christian Hamacek, Josef Holková, Jitka Houser, Josef Johnson, Chris Kelly, Sharon Leech, Andrew Mas, Caroline Matulis, Daumantas McLaughlin, Stephen H. Montserret, Roland Nasreddine, Rouba Nehmé, Reine Nguyen, Quyen Ortega-Alarcón, David Perez, Kathryn Pirc, Katja Piszczek, Grzegorz Podobnik, Marjetka Rodrigo, Natalia Rokov-Plavec, Jasmina Schaefer, Susanne Sharpe, Tim Southall, June Staunton, David Tavares, Pedro Vanek, Ondrej Weyand, Michael Wu, Di Eur Biophys J Original Article Microscale thermophoresis (MST), and the closely related Temperature Related Intensity Change (TRIC), are synonyms for a recently developed measurement technique in the field of biophysics to quantify biomolecular interactions, using the (capillary-based) NanoTemper Monolith and (multiwell plate-based) Dianthus instruments. Although this technique has been extensively used within the scientific community due to its low sample consumption, ease of use, and ubiquitous applicability, MST/TRIC has not enjoyed the unambiguous acceptance from biophysicists afforded to other biophysical techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) or surface plasmon resonance (SPR). This might be attributed to several facts, e.g., that various (not fully understood) effects are contributing to the signal, that the technique is licensed to only a single instrument developer, NanoTemper Technology, and that its reliability and reproducibility have never been tested independently and systematically. Thus, a working group of ARBRE-MOBIEU has set up a benchmark study on MST/TRIC to assess this technique as a method to characterize biomolecular interactions. Here we present the results of this study involving 32 scientific groups within Europe and two groups from the US, carrying out experiments on 40 Monolith instruments, employing a standard operation procedure and centrally prepared samples. A protein–small molecule interaction, a newly developed protein–protein interaction system and a pure dye were used as test systems. We characterized the instrument properties and evaluated instrument performance, reproducibility, the effect of different analysis tools, the influence of the experimenter during data analysis, and thus the overall reliability of this method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8519905/ /pubmed/33881594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
López-Méndez, Blanca
Baron, Bruno
Brautigam, Chad A.
Jowitt, Thomas A.
Knauer, Stefan H.
Uebel, Stephan
Williams, Mark A.
Sedivy, Arthur
Abian, Olga
Abreu, Celeste
Adamczyk, Malgorzata
Bal, Wojciech
Berger, Sylvie
Buell, Alexander K.
Carolis, Carlo
Daviter, Tina
Fish, Alexander
Garcia-Alai, Maria
Guenther, Christian
Hamacek, Josef
Holková, Jitka
Houser, Josef
Johnson, Chris
Kelly, Sharon
Leech, Andrew
Mas, Caroline
Matulis, Daumantas
McLaughlin, Stephen H.
Montserret, Roland
Nasreddine, Rouba
Nehmé, Reine
Nguyen, Quyen
Ortega-Alarcón, David
Perez, Kathryn
Pirc, Katja
Piszczek, Grzegorz
Podobnik, Marjetka
Rodrigo, Natalia
Rokov-Plavec, Jasmina
Schaefer, Susanne
Sharpe, Tim
Southall, June
Staunton, David
Tavares, Pedro
Vanek, Ondrej
Weyand, Michael
Wu, Di
Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title_full Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title_fullStr Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title_short Reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the NanoTemper Monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
title_sort reproducibility and accuracy of microscale thermophoresis in the nanotemper monolith: a multi laboratory benchmark study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00249-021-01532-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezmendezblanca reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT baronbruno reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT brautigamchada reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT jowittthomasa reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT knauerstefanh reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT uebelstephan reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT williamsmarka reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT sedivyarthur reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT abianolga reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT abreuceleste reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT adamczykmalgorzata reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT balwojciech reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT bergersylvie reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT buellalexanderk reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT caroliscarlo reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT davitertina reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT fishalexander reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT garciaalaimaria reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT guentherchristian reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT hamacekjosef reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT holkovajitka reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT houserjosef reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT johnsonchris reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT kellysharon reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT leechandrew reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT mascaroline reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT matulisdaumantas reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT mclaughlinstephenh reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT montserretroland reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT nasreddinerouba reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT nehmereine reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT nguyenquyen reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT ortegaalarcondavid reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT perezkathryn reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT pirckatja reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT piszczekgrzegorz reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT podobnikmarjetka reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT rodrigonatalia reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT rokovplavecjasmina reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT schaefersusanne reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT sharpetim reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT southalljune reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT stauntondavid reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT tavarespedro reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT vanekondrej reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT weyandmichael reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy
AT wudi reproducibilityandaccuracyofmicroscalethermophoresisinthenanotempermonolithamultilaboratorybenchmarkstudy