Cargando…
Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany
INTRODUCTION: The study was designed to assess patient satisfaction, preferences and injection habits for patients using insulin lispro 200 units/ml pen (IL200) compared to their previously used disposable 100 units/ml mealtime insulin pen (“MTI-100 pen”) in Germany. METHODS: A site-based, cross-sec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01150-7 |
_version_ | 1784584569073172480 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jieling Williams, Paul Perez-Nieves, Magaly Piras De Oliveira, Carolina Spaepen, Erik Osumili, Beatrice Poon, Jiat-Ling Schloot, Nanette C. Thun, Barbara Blüher, Matthias |
author_facet | Chen, Jieling Williams, Paul Perez-Nieves, Magaly Piras De Oliveira, Carolina Spaepen, Erik Osumili, Beatrice Poon, Jiat-Ling Schloot, Nanette C. Thun, Barbara Blüher, Matthias |
author_sort | Chen, Jieling |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The study was designed to assess patient satisfaction, preferences and injection habits for patients using insulin lispro 200 units/ml pen (IL200) compared to their previously used disposable 100 units/ml mealtime insulin pen (“MTI-100 pen”) in Germany. METHODS: A site-based, cross-sectional study involving a self-reported survey and medical record extraction in patients with diabetes currently using IL200 for between 3 and 12 months and had previously used any disposable MTI-100 pen. RESULTS: Of 114 patients included, 83.3% were satisfied with IL200 and 3.5% were dissatisfied; 70.2% preferred IL200 over their previous MTI-100 pen and 4.4% preferred their previous MTI-100 pen. The main reasons for IL200 preference were the amount of insulin the pen carries, longer use before discarding, number of non-empty pens discarded, injection volume and frequency replacing pens. Patients discarded (median) 4 IL200 pens per month with 5.3% discarding more than 10 units in their last pen. When insufficient insulin remained to complete a dose, 74.6% injected the remainder and completed with a new pen, 19.3% discarded the pen with remaining insulin, 7.0% saved it for future use and 1.8% left the dose incomplete. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction and preference for IL200 was high in this sample of patients using IL200 for 3–12 months. Reasons were consistent with IL200 features, explaining the better patient experience and potential resource saving transitioning from a disposable MTI-100 pen. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01150-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8519973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85199732021-10-29 Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany Chen, Jieling Williams, Paul Perez-Nieves, Magaly Piras De Oliveira, Carolina Spaepen, Erik Osumili, Beatrice Poon, Jiat-Ling Schloot, Nanette C. Thun, Barbara Blüher, Matthias Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The study was designed to assess patient satisfaction, preferences and injection habits for patients using insulin lispro 200 units/ml pen (IL200) compared to their previously used disposable 100 units/ml mealtime insulin pen (“MTI-100 pen”) in Germany. METHODS: A site-based, cross-sectional study involving a self-reported survey and medical record extraction in patients with diabetes currently using IL200 for between 3 and 12 months and had previously used any disposable MTI-100 pen. RESULTS: Of 114 patients included, 83.3% were satisfied with IL200 and 3.5% were dissatisfied; 70.2% preferred IL200 over their previous MTI-100 pen and 4.4% preferred their previous MTI-100 pen. The main reasons for IL200 preference were the amount of insulin the pen carries, longer use before discarding, number of non-empty pens discarded, injection volume and frequency replacing pens. Patients discarded (median) 4 IL200 pens per month with 5.3% discarding more than 10 units in their last pen. When insufficient insulin remained to complete a dose, 74.6% injected the remainder and completed with a new pen, 19.3% discarded the pen with remaining insulin, 7.0% saved it for future use and 1.8% left the dose incomplete. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction and preference for IL200 was high in this sample of patients using IL200 for 3–12 months. Reasons were consistent with IL200 features, explaining the better patient experience and potential resource saving transitioning from a disposable MTI-100 pen. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01150-7. Springer Healthcare 2021-09-20 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8519973/ /pubmed/34542865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01150-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chen, Jieling Williams, Paul Perez-Nieves, Magaly Piras De Oliveira, Carolina Spaepen, Erik Osumili, Beatrice Poon, Jiat-Ling Schloot, Nanette C. Thun, Barbara Blüher, Matthias Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title | Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title_full | Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title_fullStr | Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title_short | Satisfaction, Preference and Injection Habits of Switching to 200 Units/ml Insulin Lispro Pen from 100 Units/ml: A Patient Survey in Germany |
title_sort | satisfaction, preference and injection habits of switching to 200 units/ml insulin lispro pen from 100 units/ml: a patient survey in germany |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01150-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjieling satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT williamspaul satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT pereznievesmagaly satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT pirasdeoliveiracarolina satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT spaepenerik satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT osumilibeatrice satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT poonjiatling satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT schlootnanettec satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT thunbarbara satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany AT bluhermatthias satisfactionpreferenceandinjectionhabitsofswitchingto200unitsmlinsulinlispropenfrom100unitsmlapatientsurveyingermany |