Cargando…
Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Experts in many countries are recommending a scaling up midwifery-led care as a model to improve maternal and newborn outcomes, reduce rates of unnecessary interventions, realise cost savings, and facilitate normal spontaneous vaginal birth. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compar...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0373 |
_version_ | 1784584600667815936 |
---|---|
author | Poškienė, Ingrida Vanagas, Giedrius Kirkilytė, Asta Nadišauskienė, Rūta Jolanta |
author_facet | Poškienė, Ingrida Vanagas, Giedrius Kirkilytė, Asta Nadišauskienė, Rūta Jolanta |
author_sort | Poškienė, Ingrida |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Experts in many countries are recommending a scaling up midwifery-led care as a model to improve maternal and newborn outcomes, reduce rates of unnecessary interventions, realise cost savings, and facilitate normal spontaneous vaginal birth. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare midwifery-led and obstetrician-gynaecologist-led care-related vaginal birth outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women in Kaunas city maternity care facilities. METHODS: A propensity score-matched case–control study of midwifery-led versus physician-led low-risk birth outcomes. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical and binary variables are presented as frequency (percentage), and differences were analysed using the chi-square test. Analyses were conducted separately for the unmatched (before propensity score matched [PSM]) and matched (after PSM) groups. RESULTS: After adjusting groups for propensity score, postpartum haemorrhage differences between physician-led and midwifery-led labours were significantly different (169.5 and 152.6 mL; p = 0.026), same for hospital stay duration (3.3 and 3.1 days, p = 0.042). Also, in matched population, significant differences were seen for episiotomy rates (chi(2) = 4.8; p = 0.029), newborn Apgar 5 min score (9.58 and 9.76; p = 0.002), and pain relief (chi(2) = 14.9; p = 0.002). Significant differences were seen in unmatched but not confirmed in matched population for obstetrical procedures used during labour, breastfeeding, birth induction, newborn Apgar 1 min scores, and successful vaginal birth as an overall spontaneous vaginal birth success measure. CONCLUSION: The midwifery-led care model showed significant differences from the physician-led care model in episiotomy rates, hospital stay duration and postpartum haemorrhage, and newborn Apgar 5 min scores. Midwifery-led care is as safe as physician-led care and does not influence the rate of successful spontaneous vaginal births. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8520123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85201232021-10-28 Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis Poškienė, Ingrida Vanagas, Giedrius Kirkilytė, Asta Nadišauskienė, Rūta Jolanta Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Experts in many countries are recommending a scaling up midwifery-led care as a model to improve maternal and newborn outcomes, reduce rates of unnecessary interventions, realise cost savings, and facilitate normal spontaneous vaginal birth. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare midwifery-led and obstetrician-gynaecologist-led care-related vaginal birth outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women in Kaunas city maternity care facilities. METHODS: A propensity score-matched case–control study of midwifery-led versus physician-led low-risk birth outcomes. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical and binary variables are presented as frequency (percentage), and differences were analysed using the chi-square test. Analyses were conducted separately for the unmatched (before propensity score matched [PSM]) and matched (after PSM) groups. RESULTS: After adjusting groups for propensity score, postpartum haemorrhage differences between physician-led and midwifery-led labours were significantly different (169.5 and 152.6 mL; p = 0.026), same for hospital stay duration (3.3 and 3.1 days, p = 0.042). Also, in matched population, significant differences were seen for episiotomy rates (chi(2) = 4.8; p = 0.029), newborn Apgar 5 min score (9.58 and 9.76; p = 0.002), and pain relief (chi(2) = 14.9; p = 0.002). Significant differences were seen in unmatched but not confirmed in matched population for obstetrical procedures used during labour, breastfeeding, birth induction, newborn Apgar 1 min scores, and successful vaginal birth as an overall spontaneous vaginal birth success measure. CONCLUSION: The midwifery-led care model showed significant differences from the physician-led care model in episiotomy rates, hospital stay duration and postpartum haemorrhage, and newborn Apgar 5 min scores. Midwifery-led care is as safe as physician-led care and does not influence the rate of successful spontaneous vaginal births. De Gruyter 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8520123/ /pubmed/34722889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0373 Text en © 2021 Ingrida Poškienė et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Poškienė, Ingrida Vanagas, Giedrius Kirkilytė, Asta Nadišauskienė, Rūta Jolanta Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poskieneingrida comparisonofvaginalbirthoutcomesinmidwiferyledversusphysicianledsettingapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT vanagasgiedrius comparisonofvaginalbirthoutcomesinmidwiferyledversusphysicianledsettingapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT kirkilyteasta comparisonofvaginalbirthoutcomesinmidwiferyledversusphysicianledsettingapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT nadisauskienerutajolanta comparisonofvaginalbirthoutcomesinmidwiferyledversusphysicianledsettingapropensityscorematchedanalysis |