Cargando…
Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19
BACKGROUND: International guidelines suggest using a higher (> 10 cm H(2)O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS due to COVID-19. However, even if oxygenation generally improves with a higher PEEP, compliance, and Paco(2) frequently do not, as if recrui...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.012 |
_version_ | 1784584610870460416 |
---|---|
author | Protti, Alessandro Santini, Alessandro Pennati, Francesca Chiurazzi, Chiara Cressoni, Massimo Ferrari, Michele Iapichino, Giacomo E. Carenzo, Luca Lanza, Ezio Picardo, Giorgio Caironi, Pietro Aliverti, Andrea Cecconi, Maurizio |
author_facet | Protti, Alessandro Santini, Alessandro Pennati, Francesca Chiurazzi, Chiara Cressoni, Massimo Ferrari, Michele Iapichino, Giacomo E. Carenzo, Luca Lanza, Ezio Picardo, Giorgio Caironi, Pietro Aliverti, Andrea Cecconi, Maurizio |
author_sort | Protti, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: International guidelines suggest using a higher (> 10 cm H(2)O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS due to COVID-19. However, even if oxygenation generally improves with a higher PEEP, compliance, and Paco(2) frequently do not, as if recruitment was small. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the potential for lung recruitment small in patients with early ARDS due to COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 were studied in the supine position within 3 days of endotracheal intubation. They all underwent a PEEP trial, in which oxygenation, compliance, and Paco(2) were measured with 5, 10, and 15 cm H(2)O of PEEP, and all other ventilatory settings unchanged. Twenty underwent a whole-lung static CT scan at 5 and 45 cm H(2)O, and the other 20 at 5 and 15 cm H(2)O of airway pressure. Recruitment and hyperinflation were defined as a decrease in the volume of the non-aerated (density above −100 HU) and an increase in the volume of the over-aerated (density below −900 HU) lung compartments, respectively. RESULTS: From 5 to 15 cm H(2)O, oxygenation improved in 36 (90%) patients but compliance only in 11 (28%) and Paco(2) only in 14 (35%). From 5 to 45 cm H(2)O, recruitment was 351 (161-462) mL and hyperinflation 465 (220-681) mL. From 5 to 15 cm H(2)O, recruitment was 168 (110-202) mL and hyperinflation 121 (63-270) mL. Hyperinflation variably developed in all patients and exceeded recruitment in more than half of them. INTERPRETATION: Patients with early ARDS due to COVID-19, ventilated in the supine position, present with a large potential for lung recruitment. Even so, their compliance and Paco(2) do not generally improve with a higher PEEP, possibly because of hyperinflation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8520168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85201682021-10-18 Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 Protti, Alessandro Santini, Alessandro Pennati, Francesca Chiurazzi, Chiara Cressoni, Massimo Ferrari, Michele Iapichino, Giacomo E. Carenzo, Luca Lanza, Ezio Picardo, Giorgio Caironi, Pietro Aliverti, Andrea Cecconi, Maurizio Chest Critical Care: Original Research BACKGROUND: International guidelines suggest using a higher (> 10 cm H(2)O) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS due to COVID-19. However, even if oxygenation generally improves with a higher PEEP, compliance, and Paco(2) frequently do not, as if recruitment was small. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the potential for lung recruitment small in patients with early ARDS due to COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 were studied in the supine position within 3 days of endotracheal intubation. They all underwent a PEEP trial, in which oxygenation, compliance, and Paco(2) were measured with 5, 10, and 15 cm H(2)O of PEEP, and all other ventilatory settings unchanged. Twenty underwent a whole-lung static CT scan at 5 and 45 cm H(2)O, and the other 20 at 5 and 15 cm H(2)O of airway pressure. Recruitment and hyperinflation were defined as a decrease in the volume of the non-aerated (density above −100 HU) and an increase in the volume of the over-aerated (density below −900 HU) lung compartments, respectively. RESULTS: From 5 to 15 cm H(2)O, oxygenation improved in 36 (90%) patients but compliance only in 11 (28%) and Paco(2) only in 14 (35%). From 5 to 45 cm H(2)O, recruitment was 351 (161-462) mL and hyperinflation 465 (220-681) mL. From 5 to 15 cm H(2)O, recruitment was 168 (110-202) mL and hyperinflation 121 (63-270) mL. Hyperinflation variably developed in all patients and exceeded recruitment in more than half of them. INTERPRETATION: Patients with early ARDS due to COVID-19, ventilated in the supine position, present with a large potential for lung recruitment. Even so, their compliance and Paco(2) do not generally improve with a higher PEEP, possibly because of hyperinflation. American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-04 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8520168/ /pubmed/34666011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.012 Text en © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Critical Care: Original Research Protti, Alessandro Santini, Alessandro Pennati, Francesca Chiurazzi, Chiara Cressoni, Massimo Ferrari, Michele Iapichino, Giacomo E. Carenzo, Luca Lanza, Ezio Picardo, Giorgio Caironi, Pietro Aliverti, Andrea Cecconi, Maurizio Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title | Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title_full | Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title_short | Lung Response to a Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 |
title_sort | lung response to a higher positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with covid-19 |
topic | Critical Care: Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prottialessandro lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT santinialessandro lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT pennatifrancesca lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT chiurazzichiara lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT cressonimassimo lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT ferrarimichele lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT iapichinogiacomoe lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT carenzoluca lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT lanzaezio lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT picardogiorgio lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT caironipietro lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT alivertiandrea lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 AT cecconimaurizio lungresponsetoahigherpositiveendexpiratorypressureinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcovid19 |