Cargando…
“Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis
BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1 |
_version_ | 1784584613605146624 |
---|---|
author | den Elzen, Nicole Joseland, Sharelle L. Saya, Sibel Jonnagadla, Sowmya Isbister, Joanne Winship, Ingrid Buchanan, Daniel D. |
author_facet | den Elzen, Nicole Joseland, Sharelle L. Saya, Sibel Jonnagadla, Sowmya Isbister, Joanne Winship, Ingrid Buchanan, Daniel D. |
author_sort | den Elzen, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitative study explored how patients with CRC interpret and respond to an SLS diagnosis. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 patients with CRC who received an SLS diagnosis, recruited from cancer genetics services across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Participant responses were compared with appointment summary letters from cancer genetics services. RESULTS: Participants’ interpretations of genetic test results were found to vary widely. While this variation often aligned with variation in interpretations by cancer genetics services, participants also had difficulties with the complexity and recall of genetic test results. Participants had a range of psychological responses to the uncertainty that their results presented, from relief to disappointment and doubt. Cancer risk perceptions also varied widely, with participants’ interpretations of their genetic test results just one of several influencing factors. Despite this variability, almost all participants adhered to cancer risk management advice, although different participants received different advice. All participants also communicated any cancer risk management advice to first-degree relatives, motivated by protecting them, but information communicated was not always consistent with advice received. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings highlight the variability in patients’ interpretations of their diagnosis, cancer risk management and family communication when a diagnosis of SLS is received, and provide novel insights into how healthcare professionals can better support patients with SLS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8520179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85201792021-10-20 “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis den Elzen, Nicole Joseland, Sharelle L. Saya, Sibel Jonnagadla, Sowmya Isbister, Joanne Winship, Ingrid Buchanan, Daniel D. Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitative study explored how patients with CRC interpret and respond to an SLS diagnosis. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 patients with CRC who received an SLS diagnosis, recruited from cancer genetics services across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Participant responses were compared with appointment summary letters from cancer genetics services. RESULTS: Participants’ interpretations of genetic test results were found to vary widely. While this variation often aligned with variation in interpretations by cancer genetics services, participants also had difficulties with the complexity and recall of genetic test results. Participants had a range of psychological responses to the uncertainty that their results presented, from relief to disappointment and doubt. Cancer risk perceptions also varied widely, with participants’ interpretations of their genetic test results just one of several influencing factors. Despite this variability, almost all participants adhered to cancer risk management advice, although different participants received different advice. All participants also communicated any cancer risk management advice to first-degree relatives, motivated by protecting them, but information communicated was not always consistent with advice received. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings highlight the variability in patients’ interpretations of their diagnosis, cancer risk management and family communication when a diagnosis of SLS is received, and provide novel insights into how healthcare professionals can better support patients with SLS. BioMed Central 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8520179/ /pubmed/34656160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research den Elzen, Nicole Joseland, Sharelle L. Saya, Sibel Jonnagadla, Sowmya Isbister, Joanne Winship, Ingrid Buchanan, Daniel D. “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title | “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title_full | “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title_fullStr | “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title_short | “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis |
title_sort | “left in limbo”: exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected lynch syndrome diagnosis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denelzennicole leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT joselandsharellel leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT sayasibel leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT jonnagadlasowmya leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT isbisterjoanne leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT winshipingrid leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis AT buchanandanield leftinlimboexploringhowpatientswithcolorectalcancerinterpretandrespondtoasuspectedlynchsyndromediagnosis |