Cargando…
Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study
BACKGROUND: There are more than 10,000 admissions each year in Australia for foot disease, with an average length of hospital stay of 26 days. Early supported discharge (ESD) has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce length of stay without increasing the risk of 30-day readmissions....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06925-z |
_version_ | 1784584627494584320 |
---|---|
author | Jessup, Rebecca Hanna, Samantha Kaur, Jaspreet Bayat, Iman Bramston, Cassandra |
author_facet | Jessup, Rebecca Hanna, Samantha Kaur, Jaspreet Bayat, Iman Bramston, Cassandra |
author_sort | Jessup, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are more than 10,000 admissions each year in Australia for foot disease, with an average length of hospital stay of 26 days. Early supported discharge (ESD) has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce length of stay without increasing the risk of 30-day readmissions. This research aims to gain consensus on an optimal model of early supported discharge for foot disease. METHODS: Three focus groups were held where preliminary components for an early discharge model, as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria, were identified with a purposefully sampled group of medical, nursing, allied health staff and consumers. Two researchers independently systematically coded focus group transcripts to identify components of an ESD model using an iterative constant comparative method. These components then formed the basis of a three phase Delphi study, with all individuals from the focus groups were invited to act as panellists. Panellists rated components for their importance with consensus established as a rating of either essential or very important by ≥80% of the panel. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts (including 5 consumers) participated across the two study phases. Twenty-three (3 consumers) participated in the focus groups in phase one. Twenty-eight of the twenty-nine experts participated in the phase 2 Delphi. 21/28 completed round 1 of the Delphi (75% response rate), 22/28 completed round 2 (79% response rate), and 16/22 completed round 3 (72% response rate). Consensus was achieved for 17 (29%) of 58 components. These included changes to the way patients are managed on wards (both location and timeliness of care by the multidisciplinary team) and the addition of new workforce roles to improve co-ordination and management of the patients once they are at home. CONCLUSIONS: A model of early supported discharge that would allow individuals to return home earlier in a way that is safe, acceptable, and feasible may result in improving patient satisfaction while reducing health system burden. Future trial and implementation of the ESD model identified in this study has the potential to make a significant contribution to the experience of care for patients and to the sustainability of the health system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8520239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85202392021-10-20 Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study Jessup, Rebecca Hanna, Samantha Kaur, Jaspreet Bayat, Iman Bramston, Cassandra BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: There are more than 10,000 admissions each year in Australia for foot disease, with an average length of hospital stay of 26 days. Early supported discharge (ESD) has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce length of stay without increasing the risk of 30-day readmissions. This research aims to gain consensus on an optimal model of early supported discharge for foot disease. METHODS: Three focus groups were held where preliminary components for an early discharge model, as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria, were identified with a purposefully sampled group of medical, nursing, allied health staff and consumers. Two researchers independently systematically coded focus group transcripts to identify components of an ESD model using an iterative constant comparative method. These components then formed the basis of a three phase Delphi study, with all individuals from the focus groups were invited to act as panellists. Panellists rated components for their importance with consensus established as a rating of either essential or very important by ≥80% of the panel. RESULTS: Twenty-nine experts (including 5 consumers) participated across the two study phases. Twenty-three (3 consumers) participated in the focus groups in phase one. Twenty-eight of the twenty-nine experts participated in the phase 2 Delphi. 21/28 completed round 1 of the Delphi (75% response rate), 22/28 completed round 2 (79% response rate), and 16/22 completed round 3 (72% response rate). Consensus was achieved for 17 (29%) of 58 components. These included changes to the way patients are managed on wards (both location and timeliness of care by the multidisciplinary team) and the addition of new workforce roles to improve co-ordination and management of the patients once they are at home. CONCLUSIONS: A model of early supported discharge that would allow individuals to return home earlier in a way that is safe, acceptable, and feasible may result in improving patient satisfaction while reducing health system burden. Future trial and implementation of the ESD model identified in this study has the potential to make a significant contribution to the experience of care for patients and to the sustainability of the health system. BioMed Central 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8520239/ /pubmed/34654417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06925-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jessup, Rebecca Hanna, Samantha Kaur, Jaspreet Bayat, Iman Bramston, Cassandra Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title | Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title_full | Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title_fullStr | Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title_full_unstemmed | Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title_short | Early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
title_sort | early supported hospital discharge for foot disease: a co-design study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06925-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jessuprebecca earlysupportedhospitaldischargeforfootdiseaseacodesignstudy AT hannasamantha earlysupportedhospitaldischargeforfootdiseaseacodesignstudy AT kaurjaspreet earlysupportedhospitaldischargeforfootdiseaseacodesignstudy AT bayatiman earlysupportedhospitaldischargeforfootdiseaseacodesignstudy AT bramstoncassandra earlysupportedhospitaldischargeforfootdiseaseacodesignstudy |