Cargando…

Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer death overall. Besides genetic, reproductive, and hormonal factors involved in disease onset and progression, greater attention has focused recently on the etiologic role of environmental factors, including e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urbano, Teresa, Vinceti, Marco, Wise, Lauren A., Filippini, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7
_version_ 1784584641153335296
author Urbano, Teresa
Vinceti, Marco
Wise, Lauren A.
Filippini, Tommaso
author_facet Urbano, Teresa
Vinceti, Marco
Wise, Lauren A.
Filippini, Tommaso
author_sort Urbano, Teresa
collection PubMed
description Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer death overall. Besides genetic, reproductive, and hormonal factors involved in disease onset and progression, greater attention has focused recently on the etiologic role of environmental factors, including exposure to artificial lighting such as light-at-night (LAN). We investigated the extent to which LAN, including outdoor and indoor exposure, affects breast cancer risk. We performed a systematic review of epidemiological evidence on the association between LAN exposure and breast cancer risk, using a dose–response meta-analysis to examine the shape of the relation. We retrieved 17 eligible studies through September 13, 2021, including ten cohort and seven case–control studies. In the analysis comparing highest versus lowest LAN exposure, we found a positive association between exposure and disease risk (risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.07–1.15), with comparable associations in case–control studies (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98–1.34) and cohort studies (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15). In stratified analyses, risk was similar for outdoor and indoor LAN exposure, while slightly stronger risks were observed for premenopausal women (premenopausal: RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04–1.28; postmenopausal: 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13) and for women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (ER + : RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.17; ER–: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92–1.23). The dose–response meta-analysis, performed only in studies investigating outdoor LAN using comparable exposure assessment, showed a linear relation up to 40 nW/cm(2)/sr after which the curve flattened, especially among premenopausal women. This first assessment of the dose–response relation between LAN and breast cancer supports a positive association in selected subgroups, particularly in premenopausal women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8520294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85202942021-10-20 Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis Urbano, Teresa Vinceti, Marco Wise, Lauren A. Filippini, Tommaso Int J Health Geogr Review Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer death overall. Besides genetic, reproductive, and hormonal factors involved in disease onset and progression, greater attention has focused recently on the etiologic role of environmental factors, including exposure to artificial lighting such as light-at-night (LAN). We investigated the extent to which LAN, including outdoor and indoor exposure, affects breast cancer risk. We performed a systematic review of epidemiological evidence on the association between LAN exposure and breast cancer risk, using a dose–response meta-analysis to examine the shape of the relation. We retrieved 17 eligible studies through September 13, 2021, including ten cohort and seven case–control studies. In the analysis comparing highest versus lowest LAN exposure, we found a positive association between exposure and disease risk (risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.07–1.15), with comparable associations in case–control studies (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98–1.34) and cohort studies (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15). In stratified analyses, risk was similar for outdoor and indoor LAN exposure, while slightly stronger risks were observed for premenopausal women (premenopausal: RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04–1.28; postmenopausal: 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13) and for women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (ER + : RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.17; ER–: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92–1.23). The dose–response meta-analysis, performed only in studies investigating outdoor LAN using comparable exposure assessment, showed a linear relation up to 40 nW/cm(2)/sr after which the curve flattened, especially among premenopausal women. This first assessment of the dose–response relation between LAN and breast cancer supports a positive association in selected subgroups, particularly in premenopausal women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7. BioMed Central 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8520294/ /pubmed/34656111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Urbano, Teresa
Vinceti, Marco
Wise, Lauren A.
Filippini, Tommaso
Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title_full Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title_fullStr Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title_short Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
title_sort light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7
work_keys_str_mv AT urbanoteresa lightatnightandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT vincetimarco lightatnightandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT wiselaurena lightatnightandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT filippinitommaso lightatnightandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis