Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have studied the relationship between blood culture and mortality in sepsis patients. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of positive and negative blood culture sepsis. METHODS: We performed a study on 640 patients suffering from sepsis in Be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Long, Lin, Yue, Wang, Junyu, Song, Jianmei, Wei, Bing, Zhang, Xiangqun, Yang, Jun, Liu, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34675564
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S334161
_version_ 1784584673287995392
author Yang, Long
Lin, Yue
Wang, Junyu
Song, Jianmei
Wei, Bing
Zhang, Xiangqun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Bo
author_facet Yang, Long
Lin, Yue
Wang, Junyu
Song, Jianmei
Wei, Bing
Zhang, Xiangqun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Bo
author_sort Yang, Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have studied the relationship between blood culture and mortality in sepsis patients. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of positive and negative blood culture sepsis. METHODS: We performed a study on 640 patients suffering from sepsis in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. The primary findings revolved around length and expenditure of hospital stay, the possibility of suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and any requirements for mechanical ventilation. The secondary findings revolved around whether the patient died early (28-day) or late (28-to-90-day). RESULTS: A total of 592 of the 640 patients met the inclusion criteria for sepsis, with 274 of them having culture-positive results. The culture-positive patients were mostly elderly suffering from diabetes and at risk of cancer, with a higher white blood cell count, and higher procalcitonin. Additionally, they scored higher in their acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (15 vs.11, P=0.010), as well as in their predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction (17 vs 11, P<0.001) than the individuals in the culture-negative group. Culture-positive patients had a longer duration of hospital stay (14 vs 6, P<0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs 8.5%, P=0.019) than culture-negative ones. No significant difference in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (45.7% vs.36.4%, P=0.254) or early mortality (9.5% vs 7.2%, P=0.321) was noted between the two groups. However, the culture-positive patients had increased late mortality (15.7% vs.6.9%, P=0.001), when compared with those with culture-negative results in the cohort. Furthermore, the culture-positive patients who received the appropriate antibiotics early had a lower mortality rate than the culture-negative patients (7.3% vs.14.2%, P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Culture-positive patients had higher in-hospital mortality, comparable early mortality, and worse late mortality than the culture-negative patients. Early appropriate use of antibiotics might reduce mortality and improve clinical prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8520438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85204382021-10-20 Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Yang, Long Lin, Yue Wang, Junyu Song, Jianmei Wei, Bing Zhang, Xiangqun Yang, Jun Liu, Bo Infect Drug Resist Original Research BACKGROUND: Few studies have studied the relationship between blood culture and mortality in sepsis patients. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of positive and negative blood culture sepsis. METHODS: We performed a study on 640 patients suffering from sepsis in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from October 2017 to December 2019. The primary findings revolved around length and expenditure of hospital stay, the possibility of suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and any requirements for mechanical ventilation. The secondary findings revolved around whether the patient died early (28-day) or late (28-to-90-day). RESULTS: A total of 592 of the 640 patients met the inclusion criteria for sepsis, with 274 of them having culture-positive results. The culture-positive patients were mostly elderly suffering from diabetes and at risk of cancer, with a higher white blood cell count, and higher procalcitonin. Additionally, they scored higher in their acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score (15 vs.11, P=0.010), as well as in their predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction (17 vs 11, P<0.001) than the individuals in the culture-negative group. Culture-positive patients had a longer duration of hospital stay (14 vs 6, P<0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs 8.5%, P=0.019) than culture-negative ones. No significant difference in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (45.7% vs.36.4%, P=0.254) or early mortality (9.5% vs 7.2%, P=0.321) was noted between the two groups. However, the culture-positive patients had increased late mortality (15.7% vs.6.9%, P=0.001), when compared with those with culture-negative results in the cohort. Furthermore, the culture-positive patients who received the appropriate antibiotics early had a lower mortality rate than the culture-negative patients (7.3% vs.14.2%, P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Culture-positive patients had higher in-hospital mortality, comparable early mortality, and worse late mortality than the culture-negative patients. Early appropriate use of antibiotics might reduce mortality and improve clinical prognosis. Dove 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8520438/ /pubmed/34675564 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S334161 Text en © 2021 Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Long
Lin, Yue
Wang, Junyu
Song, Jianmei
Wei, Bing
Zhang, Xiangqun
Yang, Jun
Liu, Bo
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between positive and negative blood culture septic patients: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34675564
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S334161
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglong comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linyue comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangjunyu comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT songjianmei comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT weibing comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangxiangqun comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangjun comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liubo comparisonofclinicalcharacteristicsandoutcomesbetweenpositiveandnegativebloodculturesepticpatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy