Cargando…

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Antigen-based point-of-care tests for identification of SARS-CoV-2 may markedly enhance effectiveness of population-based controlling strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated >70% sensitivity and high specificity compared with reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in symp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkel, Beatrice, Schram, Emma, Gremmels, Hendrik, Debast, Sylvia, Schuurman, Rob, Wensing, Annemarie, Bonten, Marc, Goedhart, Edwin, Hofstra, Marije
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048206
_version_ 1784584700304556032
author Winkel, Beatrice
Schram, Emma
Gremmels, Hendrik
Debast, Sylvia
Schuurman, Rob
Wensing, Annemarie
Bonten, Marc
Goedhart, Edwin
Hofstra, Marije
author_facet Winkel, Beatrice
Schram, Emma
Gremmels, Hendrik
Debast, Sylvia
Schuurman, Rob
Wensing, Annemarie
Bonten, Marc
Goedhart, Edwin
Hofstra, Marije
author_sort Winkel, Beatrice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antigen-based point-of-care tests for identification of SARS-CoV-2 may markedly enhance effectiveness of population-based controlling strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated >70% sensitivity and high specificity compared with reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in symptomatic individuals, but test performance for asymptomatic individuals is unknown. METHODS: Test performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) was compared with RT-PCR in a longitudinal cohort study of asymptomatic football players and staff members of professional football clubs. Based on timing of symptoms and prior and subsequent test results, positive RT-PCR tests were categorised as presymptomatic, early or late infection, or persistent RNA shedding. FINDINGS: 2425 tests were performed in 824 individuals, of which 52 (6.3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive based on RT-PCR. There were 2406 paired sets from asymptomatic subjects for analysis. Sixteen Panbio tests were inconclusive, for which sensitivity analyses were performed (considering results as either positive or negative or being excluded). Sensitivity of Panbio for screening of asymptomatic individuals ranged from 80.0% (61.4–92.3) to 86.67% (69.2–96.2) and specificity from 99.53% (95% CI 99.2 to 99.8) to 100% (95% CI 99.8 to 100). Sensitivity of Panbio to detect subjects with presymptomatic/early infection (n=42) ranged from 81.82% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.8) to 90.91% (95% CI 78.3 to 97.5) with specificity always above 99%. INTERPRETATION: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test identifies 81%–90% of presymptomatic and early asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with high specificity. This test may therefore be adopted in testing strategies such as targeted screening of specific populations where prevalence is low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8520587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85205872021-10-19 Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study Winkel, Beatrice Schram, Emma Gremmels, Hendrik Debast, Sylvia Schuurman, Rob Wensing, Annemarie Bonten, Marc Goedhart, Edwin Hofstra, Marije BMJ Open Public Health BACKGROUND: Antigen-based point-of-care tests for identification of SARS-CoV-2 may markedly enhance effectiveness of population-based controlling strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated >70% sensitivity and high specificity compared with reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in symptomatic individuals, but test performance for asymptomatic individuals is unknown. METHODS: Test performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) was compared with RT-PCR in a longitudinal cohort study of asymptomatic football players and staff members of professional football clubs. Based on timing of symptoms and prior and subsequent test results, positive RT-PCR tests were categorised as presymptomatic, early or late infection, or persistent RNA shedding. FINDINGS: 2425 tests were performed in 824 individuals, of which 52 (6.3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive based on RT-PCR. There were 2406 paired sets from asymptomatic subjects for analysis. Sixteen Panbio tests were inconclusive, for which sensitivity analyses were performed (considering results as either positive or negative or being excluded). Sensitivity of Panbio for screening of asymptomatic individuals ranged from 80.0% (61.4–92.3) to 86.67% (69.2–96.2) and specificity from 99.53% (95% CI 99.2 to 99.8) to 100% (95% CI 99.8 to 100). Sensitivity of Panbio to detect subjects with presymptomatic/early infection (n=42) ranged from 81.82% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.8) to 90.91% (95% CI 78.3 to 97.5) with specificity always above 99%. INTERPRETATION: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test identifies 81%–90% of presymptomatic and early asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with high specificity. This test may therefore be adopted in testing strategies such as targeted screening of specific populations where prevalence is low. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8520587/ /pubmed/34645658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048206 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Winkel, Beatrice
Schram, Emma
Gremmels, Hendrik
Debast, Sylvia
Schuurman, Rob
Wensing, Annemarie
Bonten, Marc
Goedhart, Edwin
Hofstra, Marije
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title_full Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title_short Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study
title_sort screening for sars-cov-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the panbio covid-19 antigen rapid test (abbott) compared with rt-pcr: a prospective cohort study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048206
work_keys_str_mv AT winkelbeatrice screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT schramemma screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT gremmelshendrik screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT debastsylvia screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT schuurmanrob screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT wensingannemarie screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT bontenmarc screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT goedhartedwin screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT hofstramarije screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy
AT screeningforsarscov2infectioninasymptomaticindividualsusingthepanbiocovid19antigenrapidtestabbottcomparedwithrtpcraprospectivecohortstudy