Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Lignocaine with adrenaline is routinely used as a local anesthetic for dental procedures. Adrenaline was added to increase the duration of anesthesia. However, epinephrine containing a local anesthetic solution is not recommended in conditions such as advanced cardiovascular diseases and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakade, Aniket Narayan, Joshi, Sanjay S., Naik, Charudatta Shridhar, Mhatre, Bhupendra Vilas, Ansari, Arsalan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703894
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.5.451
_version_ 1784584763921661952
author Kakade, Aniket Narayan
Joshi, Sanjay S.
Naik, Charudatta Shridhar
Mhatre, Bhupendra Vilas
Ansari, Arsalan
author_facet Kakade, Aniket Narayan
Joshi, Sanjay S.
Naik, Charudatta Shridhar
Mhatre, Bhupendra Vilas
Ansari, Arsalan
author_sort Kakade, Aniket Narayan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lignocaine with adrenaline is routinely used as a local anesthetic for dental procedures. Adrenaline was added to increase the duration of anesthesia. However, epinephrine containing a local anesthetic solution is not recommended in conditions such as advanced cardiovascular diseases and hyperthyroidism. Recently, ropivacaine has gained popularity as a long-acting anesthetic with superior outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of 0.75% ropivacaine alone and 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000) in the removal of bilateral maxillary wisdom teeth using the posterior superior alveolar nerve block technique. METHODS: This was a single-blind, randomized, split-mouth, prospective study assessing 15 systemically sound outpatients who needed bilateral removal of maxillary third molars. We randomly allocated the sides and sequences of ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline administration. We evaluated the efficacy of both anesthetics with regard to the onset of anesthesia, intensity of pain, variation in heart rate, and blood pressure. RESULTS: The onset of anesthesia was faster with lignocaine (138 s) than with ropivacaine (168 s), with insignificant differences (p = 0.001). There was no need for additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group, while in the lignocaine with adrenaline group, 2 (13.3%) patients required additional anesthesia. Adequate intraoperative anesthesia was provided by ropivacaine and lignocaine solutions. No significant difference was observed in the perioperative variation in blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine (0.75%) is a safe and an adrenaline-free local anesthetic option for posterior superior alveolar nerve block, which provides adequate intraoperative anesthesia and a stable hemodynamic profile for the removal of the maxillary third molar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8520834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85208342021-10-25 Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial Kakade, Aniket Narayan Joshi, Sanjay S. Naik, Charudatta Shridhar Mhatre, Bhupendra Vilas Ansari, Arsalan J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Lignocaine with adrenaline is routinely used as a local anesthetic for dental procedures. Adrenaline was added to increase the duration of anesthesia. However, epinephrine containing a local anesthetic solution is not recommended in conditions such as advanced cardiovascular diseases and hyperthyroidism. Recently, ropivacaine has gained popularity as a long-acting anesthetic with superior outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of 0.75% ropivacaine alone and 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000) in the removal of bilateral maxillary wisdom teeth using the posterior superior alveolar nerve block technique. METHODS: This was a single-blind, randomized, split-mouth, prospective study assessing 15 systemically sound outpatients who needed bilateral removal of maxillary third molars. We randomly allocated the sides and sequences of ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline administration. We evaluated the efficacy of both anesthetics with regard to the onset of anesthesia, intensity of pain, variation in heart rate, and blood pressure. RESULTS: The onset of anesthesia was faster with lignocaine (138 s) than with ropivacaine (168 s), with insignificant differences (p = 0.001). There was no need for additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group, while in the lignocaine with adrenaline group, 2 (13.3%) patients required additional anesthesia. Adequate intraoperative anesthesia was provided by ropivacaine and lignocaine solutions. No significant difference was observed in the perioperative variation in blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine (0.75%) is a safe and an adrenaline-free local anesthetic option for posterior superior alveolar nerve block, which provides adequate intraoperative anesthesia and a stable hemodynamic profile for the removal of the maxillary third molar. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021-10 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8520834/ /pubmed/34703894 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.5.451 Text en Copyright © 2021 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kakade, Aniket Narayan
Joshi, Sanjay S.
Naik, Charudatta Shridhar
Mhatre, Bhupendra Vilas
Ansari, Arsalan
Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703894
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.5.451
work_keys_str_mv AT kakadeaniketnarayan clinicalefficacyof075ropivacainevs2lignocainehydrochloridewithadrenaline180000inpatientsundergoingremovalofbilateralmaxillarythirdmolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT joshisanjays clinicalefficacyof075ropivacainevs2lignocainehydrochloridewithadrenaline180000inpatientsundergoingremovalofbilateralmaxillarythirdmolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT naikcharudattashridhar clinicalefficacyof075ropivacainevs2lignocainehydrochloridewithadrenaline180000inpatientsundergoingremovalofbilateralmaxillarythirdmolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mhatrebhupendravilas clinicalefficacyof075ropivacainevs2lignocainehydrochloridewithadrenaline180000inpatientsundergoingremovalofbilateralmaxillarythirdmolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ansariarsalan clinicalefficacyof075ropivacainevs2lignocainehydrochloridewithadrenaline180000inpatientsundergoingremovalofbilateralmaxillarythirdmolarsarandomizedcontrolledtrial