Cargando…
In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existenc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064 |
_version_ | 1784584845690667008 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, James Weaver, John A. Desai, Maya Cox, Jonathan A.G. |
author_facet | Harrison, James Weaver, John A. Desai, Maya Cox, Jonathan A.G. |
author_sort | Harrison, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8521170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85211702021-10-25 In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex Harrison, James Weaver, John A. Desai, Maya Cox, Jonathan A.G. Cell Surf Article Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections. Elsevier 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8521170/ /pubmed/34703957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Harrison, James Weaver, John A. Desai, Maya Cox, Jonathan A.G. In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title | In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title_full | In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title_fullStr | In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title_short | In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex |
title_sort | in vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against mycobacterium abscessus complex |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonjames invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex AT weaverjohna invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex AT desaimaya invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex AT coxjonathanag invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex |