Cargando…

In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex

Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, James, Weaver, John A., Desai, Maya, Cox, Jonathan A.G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064
_version_ 1784584845690667008
author Harrison, James
Weaver, John A.
Desai, Maya
Cox, Jonathan A.G.
author_facet Harrison, James
Weaver, John A.
Desai, Maya
Cox, Jonathan A.G.
author_sort Harrison, James
collection PubMed
description Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8521170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85211702021-10-25 In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex Harrison, James Weaver, John A. Desai, Maya Cox, Jonathan A.G. Cell Surf Article Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections. Elsevier 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8521170/ /pubmed/34703957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Harrison, James
Weaver, John A.
Desai, Maya
Cox, Jonathan A.G.
In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title_full In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title_fullStr In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title_full_unstemmed In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title_short In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex
title_sort in vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against mycobacterium abscessus complex
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonjames invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex
AT weaverjohna invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex
AT desaimaya invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex
AT coxjonathanag invitroefficacyofrelebactamversusavibactamagainstmycobacteriumabscessuscomplex