Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jung Ho, Sohn, Chong-Il, Yoon, Kyung Jae, Park, Jung Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642271
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049
_version_ 1784584907806212096
author Park, Jung Ho
Sohn, Chong-Il
Yoon, Kyung Jae
Park, Jung Hwan
author_facet Park, Jung Ho
Sohn, Chong-Il
Yoon, Kyung Jae
Park, Jung Hwan
author_sort Park, Jung Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed in 180 patients with dysphagia. For comparison, 26 asymptomatic subjects were also recruited. IRP of the UES was defined as means of 0.2, 0.25, or 0.3 seconds (sIRPs) of maximal deglutitive relaxation in a 0.4-second window (a new equation for IRP calculation was developed using MATLAB). Also, the relaxation time interval of the UES, and mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility (as a contractile integral) were evaluated using HRM. RESULTS: In normal subjects, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). They were not associated with the relaxation time interval of the UES. In contrast, in patients with dysphagia, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs were strongly related to relaxation time intervals of the UES (P < 0.05), and mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs in patients with aspiration were significantly higher than those of patients without aspiration (P < 0.01). However, in multivariate regression analyses, the main risk factor for aspiration was only a shorter relaxation time interval. CONCLUSIONS: IRP values were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia and aspiration. However, its usefulness as a predictive factor for aspiration was less than the relaxation time interval of the UES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8521479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85214792021-10-30 Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Park, Jung Ho Sohn, Chong-Il Yoon, Kyung Jae Park, Jung Hwan J Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed in 180 patients with dysphagia. For comparison, 26 asymptomatic subjects were also recruited. IRP of the UES was defined as means of 0.2, 0.25, or 0.3 seconds (sIRPs) of maximal deglutitive relaxation in a 0.4-second window (a new equation for IRP calculation was developed using MATLAB). Also, the relaxation time interval of the UES, and mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility (as a contractile integral) were evaluated using HRM. RESULTS: In normal subjects, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). They were not associated with the relaxation time interval of the UES. In contrast, in patients with dysphagia, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs were strongly related to relaxation time intervals of the UES (P < 0.05), and mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs in patients with aspiration were significantly higher than those of patients without aspiration (P < 0.01). However, in multivariate regression analyses, the main risk factor for aspiration was only a shorter relaxation time interval. CONCLUSIONS: IRP values were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia and aspiration. However, its usefulness as a predictive factor for aspiration was less than the relaxation time interval of the UES. The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021-10-30 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8521479/ /pubmed/34642271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049 Text en © 2021 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jung Ho
Sohn, Chong-Il
Yoon, Kyung Jae
Park, Jung Hwan
Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title_full Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title_short Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
title_sort comparative analysis of relaxation time interval and integrated relaxation pressure as risk factors for aspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642271
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjungho comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia
AT sohnchongil comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia
AT yoonkyungjae comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia
AT parkjunghwan comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia