Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049 |
_version_ | 1784584907806212096 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jung Ho Sohn, Chong-Il Yoon, Kyung Jae Park, Jung Hwan |
author_facet | Park, Jung Ho Sohn, Chong-Il Yoon, Kyung Jae Park, Jung Hwan |
author_sort | Park, Jung Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed in 180 patients with dysphagia. For comparison, 26 asymptomatic subjects were also recruited. IRP of the UES was defined as means of 0.2, 0.25, or 0.3 seconds (sIRPs) of maximal deglutitive relaxation in a 0.4-second window (a new equation for IRP calculation was developed using MATLAB). Also, the relaxation time interval of the UES, and mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility (as a contractile integral) were evaluated using HRM. RESULTS: In normal subjects, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). They were not associated with the relaxation time interval of the UES. In contrast, in patients with dysphagia, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs were strongly related to relaxation time intervals of the UES (P < 0.05), and mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs in patients with aspiration were significantly higher than those of patients without aspiration (P < 0.01). However, in multivariate regression analyses, the main risk factor for aspiration was only a shorter relaxation time interval. CONCLUSIONS: IRP values were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia and aspiration. However, its usefulness as a predictive factor for aspiration was less than the relaxation time interval of the UES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8521479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85214792021-10-30 Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Park, Jung Ho Sohn, Chong-Il Yoon, Kyung Jae Park, Jung Hwan J Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is an important metric for functional evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter. However, the effectiveness of IRP for evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function has not yet been clarified. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed in 180 patients with dysphagia. For comparison, 26 asymptomatic subjects were also recruited. IRP of the UES was defined as means of 0.2, 0.25, or 0.3 seconds (sIRPs) of maximal deglutitive relaxation in a 0.4-second window (a new equation for IRP calculation was developed using MATLAB). Also, the relaxation time interval of the UES, and mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility (as a contractile integral) were evaluated using HRM. RESULTS: In normal subjects, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). They were not associated with the relaxation time interval of the UES. In contrast, in patients with dysphagia, mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs were strongly related to relaxation time intervals of the UES (P < 0.05), and mean values of 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 sIRPs in patients with aspiration were significantly higher than those of patients without aspiration (P < 0.01). However, in multivariate regression analyses, the main risk factor for aspiration was only a shorter relaxation time interval. CONCLUSIONS: IRP values were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia and aspiration. However, its usefulness as a predictive factor for aspiration was less than the relaxation time interval of the UES. The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021-10-30 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8521479/ /pubmed/34642271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049 Text en © 2021 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Jung Ho Sohn, Chong-Il Yoon, Kyung Jae Park, Jung Hwan Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title | Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Relaxation Time Interval and Integrated Relaxation Pressure as Risk Factors for Aspiration in Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia |
title_sort | comparative analysis of relaxation time interval and integrated relaxation pressure as risk factors for aspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642271 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm20049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjungho comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia AT sohnchongil comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia AT yoonkyungjae comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia AT parkjunghwan comparativeanalysisofrelaxationtimeintervalandintegratedrelaxationpressureasriskfactorsforaspirationinpatientswithoropharyngealdysphagia |