Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0 |
_version_ | 1784584928434847744 |
---|---|
author | Gubler-Gut, Barbara E. Pöhlmann, Johannes Flatz, Aline Schwenkglenks, Matthias Rohrmann, Sabine |
author_facet | Gubler-Gut, Barbara E. Pöhlmann, Johannes Flatz, Aline Schwenkglenks, Matthias Rohrmann, Sabine |
author_sort | Gubler-Gut, Barbara E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare. Available evidence from breast cancer survivor research has shown inconsistent results, and transfer of results to other types of cancer is not straightforward. This paper systematically reviewed current evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors independent of cancer type compared to usual care or another experimental intervention. METHODS: The literature search was conducted in seven databases and enhanced by a search for gray literature. Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Seven studies, five cost-utility, and two combined cost-utility/cost-effectiveness analyses fully met the inclusion criteria. They covered eight different types of cancer and various interventions. The cost-effectiveness analyses were of moderate to high methodological quality. A high probability of cost-effectiveness was reported in two analyses. One intervention appeared to be not cost-effective, and one to be cost-effective only from an organizational perspective. Three other analyses reported a cost-effectiveness better than US$ 101,195 (€ 80,000) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries were cost-effective in some but not all clinical trials reviewed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions appear to depend upon the intensity of the activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8521580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85215802021-10-22 Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review Gubler-Gut, Barbara E. Pöhlmann, Johannes Flatz, Aline Schwenkglenks, Matthias Rohrmann, Sabine J Cancer Surviv Review PURPOSE: Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare. Available evidence from breast cancer survivor research has shown inconsistent results, and transfer of results to other types of cancer is not straightforward. This paper systematically reviewed current evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors independent of cancer type compared to usual care or another experimental intervention. METHODS: The literature search was conducted in seven databases and enhanced by a search for gray literature. Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Seven studies, five cost-utility, and two combined cost-utility/cost-effectiveness analyses fully met the inclusion criteria. They covered eight different types of cancer and various interventions. The cost-effectiveness analyses were of moderate to high methodological quality. A high probability of cost-effectiveness was reported in two analyses. One intervention appeared to be not cost-effective, and one to be cost-effective only from an organizational perspective. Three other analyses reported a cost-effectiveness better than US$ 101,195 (€ 80,000) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries were cost-effective in some but not all clinical trials reviewed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions appear to depend upon the intensity of the activity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0. Springer US 2021-02-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8521580/ /pubmed/33624172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Gubler-Gut, Barbara E. Pöhlmann, Johannes Flatz, Aline Schwenkglenks, Matthias Rohrmann, Sabine Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title | Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gublergutbarbarae costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsincancersurvivorsofdevelopedcountriesasystematicreview AT pohlmannjohannes costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsincancersurvivorsofdevelopedcountriesasystematicreview AT flatzaline costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsincancersurvivorsofdevelopedcountriesasystematicreview AT schwenkglenksmatthias costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsincancersurvivorsofdevelopedcountriesasystematicreview AT rohrmannsabine costeffectivenessofphysicalactivityinterventionsincancersurvivorsofdevelopedcountriesasystematicreview |