Cargando…
A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347 |
_version_ | 1784584947387858944 |
---|---|
author | Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. Muncey, Aaron R. Serdiuk, Andrew A. Miller, Melissa D. Hanna, Mark M. Laborde, Jose M. Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. |
author_facet | Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. Muncey, Aaron R. Serdiuk, Andrew A. Miller, Melissa D. Hanna, Mark M. Laborde, Jose M. Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. |
author_sort | Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cancer Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients seen via telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation compared with an in-person cohort meeting telemedicine criteria had it been available. Telemedicine was conducted from our clinic to a patient’s remote location using video conferencing. Clinic criteria were revised to create a tier of eligible patients based on published guidelines and anesthesiologist consensus. RESULTS: Day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 1.67% in the telemedicine versus 0% in the in-person cohort. The two telemedicine group cancellations were unrelated to medical workup, and cancellation rate between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .49). Median round trip distance and time saved by the telemedicine group was 80 miles [range 4; 1180] and 121 minutes [range 16; 1034]. Using the federal mileage rate, the median cost savings was $46 [range $2.30; 678.50] per patient. Patients were similar in gender and race in both groups (P = .23 and .75, respectively), but the in-person cohort was older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation results in time, distance, and financial savings without increased day-of-surgery cancellations. This is useful in cancer patients who travel significant distances to specialty centers and have a high frequency of health care visits. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and age differences between cohorts indicate possible patient or provider selection bias. Randomized controlled trials will aid in further exploring this technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8521730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85217302021-10-19 A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. Muncey, Aaron R. Serdiuk, Andrew A. Miller, Melissa D. Hanna, Mark M. Laborde, Jose M. Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. Cancer Control Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cancer Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients seen via telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation compared with an in-person cohort meeting telemedicine criteria had it been available. Telemedicine was conducted from our clinic to a patient’s remote location using video conferencing. Clinic criteria were revised to create a tier of eligible patients based on published guidelines and anesthesiologist consensus. RESULTS: Day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 1.67% in the telemedicine versus 0% in the in-person cohort. The two telemedicine group cancellations were unrelated to medical workup, and cancellation rate between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .49). Median round trip distance and time saved by the telemedicine group was 80 miles [range 4; 1180] and 121 minutes [range 16; 1034]. Using the federal mileage rate, the median cost savings was $46 [range $2.30; 678.50] per patient. Patients were similar in gender and race in both groups (P = .23 and .75, respectively), but the in-person cohort was older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation results in time, distance, and financial savings without increased day-of-surgery cancellations. This is useful in cancer patients who travel significant distances to specialty centers and have a high frequency of health care visits. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and age differences between cohorts indicate possible patient or provider selection bias. Randomized controlled trials will aid in further exploring this technology. SAGE Publications 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8521730/ /pubmed/34644199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. Muncey, Aaron R. Serdiuk, Andrew A. Miller, Melissa D. Hanna, Mark M. Laborde, Jose M. Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title | A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title_full | A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title_short | A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of patients undergoing telemedicine evaluation in the preanesthesia testing clinic at h. lee moffitt cancer center |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aldawoodinasrinn aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT munceyaaronr aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT serdiukandrewa aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT millermelissad aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT hannamarkm aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT labordejosem aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT garciagettingrosemariee aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT aldawoodinasrinn retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT munceyaaronr retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT serdiukandrewa retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT millermelissad retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT hannamarkm retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT labordejosem retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter AT garciagettingrosemariee retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter |