Cargando…

A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldawoodi, Nasrin N., Muncey, Aaron R., Serdiuk, Andrew A., Miller, Melissa D., Hanna, Mark M., Laborde, Jose M., Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347
_version_ 1784584947387858944
author Aldawoodi, Nasrin N.
Muncey, Aaron R.
Serdiuk, Andrew A.
Miller, Melissa D.
Hanna, Mark M.
Laborde, Jose M.
Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E.
author_facet Aldawoodi, Nasrin N.
Muncey, Aaron R.
Serdiuk, Andrew A.
Miller, Melissa D.
Hanna, Mark M.
Laborde, Jose M.
Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E.
author_sort Aldawoodi, Nasrin N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cancer Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients seen via telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation compared with an in-person cohort meeting telemedicine criteria had it been available. Telemedicine was conducted from our clinic to a patient’s remote location using video conferencing. Clinic criteria were revised to create a tier of eligible patients based on published guidelines and anesthesiologist consensus. RESULTS: Day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 1.67% in the telemedicine versus 0% in the in-person cohort. The two telemedicine group cancellations were unrelated to medical workup, and cancellation rate between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .49). Median round trip distance and time saved by the telemedicine group was 80 miles [range 4; 1180] and 121 minutes [range 16; 1034]. Using the federal mileage rate, the median cost savings was $46 [range $2.30; 678.50] per patient. Patients were similar in gender and race in both groups (P = .23 and .75, respectively), but the in-person cohort was older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation results in time, distance, and financial savings without increased day-of-surgery cancellations. This is useful in cancer patients who travel significant distances to specialty centers and have a high frequency of health care visits. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and age differences between cohorts indicate possible patient or provider selection bias. Randomized controlled trials will aid in further exploring this technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8521730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85217302021-10-19 A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Aldawoodi, Nasrin N. Muncey, Aaron R. Serdiuk, Andrew A. Miller, Melissa D. Hanna, Mark M. Laborde, Jose M. Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E. Cancer Control Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cancer Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients seen via telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation compared with an in-person cohort meeting telemedicine criteria had it been available. Telemedicine was conducted from our clinic to a patient’s remote location using video conferencing. Clinic criteria were revised to create a tier of eligible patients based on published guidelines and anesthesiologist consensus. RESULTS: Day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 1.67% in the telemedicine versus 0% in the in-person cohort. The two telemedicine group cancellations were unrelated to medical workup, and cancellation rate between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .49). Median round trip distance and time saved by the telemedicine group was 80 miles [range 4; 1180] and 121 minutes [range 16; 1034]. Using the federal mileage rate, the median cost savings was $46 [range $2.30; 678.50] per patient. Patients were similar in gender and race in both groups (P = .23 and .75, respectively), but the in-person cohort was older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation results in time, distance, and financial savings without increased day-of-surgery cancellations. This is useful in cancer patients who travel significant distances to specialty centers and have a high frequency of health care visits. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and age differences between cohorts indicate possible patient or provider selection bias. Randomized controlled trials will aid in further exploring this technology. SAGE Publications 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8521730/ /pubmed/34644199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Aldawoodi, Nasrin N.
Muncey, Aaron R.
Serdiuk, Andrew A.
Miller, Melissa D.
Hanna, Mark M.
Laborde, Jose M.
Garcia Getting, Rosemarie E.
A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title_full A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title_fullStr A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title_short A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
title_sort retrospective analysis of patients undergoing telemedicine evaluation in the preanesthesia testing clinic at h. lee moffitt cancer center
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748211044347
work_keys_str_mv AT aldawoodinasrinn aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT munceyaaronr aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT serdiukandrewa aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT millermelissad aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT hannamarkm aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT labordejosem aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT garciagettingrosemariee aretrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT aldawoodinasrinn retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT munceyaaronr retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT serdiukandrewa retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT millermelissad retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT hannamarkm retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT labordejosem retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter
AT garciagettingrosemariee retrospectiveanalysisofpatientsundergoingtelemedicineevaluationinthepreanesthesiatestingclinicathleemoffittcancercenter