Cargando…

Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems

Delivery of limit-fed, complete rations requires significant capital investment, and creates logistical challenges for producers. Deconstruction and separate delivery of roughage and concentrate portions of diets may decrease feeding cost. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baber, J R, Sawyer, J E, Trubenbach, L A, Wickersham, T A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab027
_version_ 1784584950485352448
author Baber, J R
Sawyer, J E
Trubenbach, L A
Wickersham, T A
author_facet Baber, J R
Sawyer, J E
Trubenbach, L A
Wickersham, T A
author_sort Baber, J R
collection PubMed
description Delivery of limit-fed, complete rations requires significant capital investment, and creates logistical challenges for producers. Deconstruction and separate delivery of roughage and concentrate portions of diets may decrease feeding cost. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential of separately limit-feeding roughage and concentrate. In Experiment 1, 4 ruminally cannulated steers (371 ± 12 kg bodyweight) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square to evaluate the effects of time of concentrate delivery in deconstructed diets. Intake was restricted to 80% of predicted NE(m) requirements of a diet consisting of wheat straw (35%), cracked corn (29%), and distillers’ grains (27%) formulated to contain 1.58 Mcal NE(m)/kg. Treatments were: concentrate fed 2 h prior to wheat straw (–2S), concentrate and wheat straw fed as total mixed ration (TMR), concentrate fed 2 h after wheat straw (+2S), and concentrate fed 12 h after wheat straw (+12S). In Experiment 2, 95 mid- to late-gestation cows (503 ± 151 kg) were used in a 112-d trial to evaluate feeding system on cow performance. Cows were assigned to 1 of 12 pens. Treatments were limit-fed the complete diet from Experiment 1 (TMR), fed roughage and concentrate portions of the deconstructed TMR 12 h apart (SEP), and ad libitum bermudagrass hay (HAY). Bodyweight (BW), BCS, and back fat measures were collected every 28 d. In Experiment 1, treatment did not affect DM or OM digestion (P ≥ 0.88), rate of particulate passage (P ≥ 0.55), or ruminal DM fill (P ≥ 0.19). Fill averaged 3.8 kg DM. Nadir of ruminal pH occurred 4–8 h after concentrate was delivered, but mean ruminal pH was not different among treatments (P = 0.22) ranging from 6.4 to 6.6 for +2S and 12S, respectively. In Experiment 2, treatment did not affect final BW (518 kg; P = 0.72) or final BCS (5.6; P = 0.67), but limit-fed strategies tended (P = 0.06) to have greater final RE (137.1, 98.9, and –14.6 Mcal for TMR, SEP, and HAY, respectively). Delivering forage and concentrate separately did not change digestion, and timing of concentrate delivery had only minor effects on ruminal fermentation. Limit-feeding a TMR or separate delivery of roughage and concentrate sustained cow performance compared to ad libitum hay consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8521746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85217462021-10-19 Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems Baber, J R Sawyer, J E Trubenbach, L A Wickersham, T A Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition Delivery of limit-fed, complete rations requires significant capital investment, and creates logistical challenges for producers. Deconstruction and separate delivery of roughage and concentrate portions of diets may decrease feeding cost. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential of separately limit-feeding roughage and concentrate. In Experiment 1, 4 ruminally cannulated steers (371 ± 12 kg bodyweight) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square to evaluate the effects of time of concentrate delivery in deconstructed diets. Intake was restricted to 80% of predicted NE(m) requirements of a diet consisting of wheat straw (35%), cracked corn (29%), and distillers’ grains (27%) formulated to contain 1.58 Mcal NE(m)/kg. Treatments were: concentrate fed 2 h prior to wheat straw (–2S), concentrate and wheat straw fed as total mixed ration (TMR), concentrate fed 2 h after wheat straw (+2S), and concentrate fed 12 h after wheat straw (+12S). In Experiment 2, 95 mid- to late-gestation cows (503 ± 151 kg) were used in a 112-d trial to evaluate feeding system on cow performance. Cows were assigned to 1 of 12 pens. Treatments were limit-fed the complete diet from Experiment 1 (TMR), fed roughage and concentrate portions of the deconstructed TMR 12 h apart (SEP), and ad libitum bermudagrass hay (HAY). Bodyweight (BW), BCS, and back fat measures were collected every 28 d. In Experiment 1, treatment did not affect DM or OM digestion (P ≥ 0.88), rate of particulate passage (P ≥ 0.55), or ruminal DM fill (P ≥ 0.19). Fill averaged 3.8 kg DM. Nadir of ruminal pH occurred 4–8 h after concentrate was delivered, but mean ruminal pH was not different among treatments (P = 0.22) ranging from 6.4 to 6.6 for +2S and 12S, respectively. In Experiment 2, treatment did not affect final BW (518 kg; P = 0.72) or final BCS (5.6; P = 0.67), but limit-fed strategies tended (P = 0.06) to have greater final RE (137.1, 98.9, and –14.6 Mcal for TMR, SEP, and HAY, respectively). Delivering forage and concentrate separately did not change digestion, and timing of concentrate delivery had only minor effects on ruminal fermentation. Limit-feeding a TMR or separate delivery of roughage and concentrate sustained cow performance compared to ad libitum hay consumption. Oxford University Press 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8521746/ /pubmed/34671719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab027 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Baber, J R
Sawyer, J E
Trubenbach, L A
Wickersham, T A
Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title_full Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title_fullStr Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title_full_unstemmed Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title_short Effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
title_sort effect of feeding method on nutrient utilization and cow performance in limit-fed cow-calf systems
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab027
work_keys_str_mv AT baberjr effectoffeedingmethodonnutrientutilizationandcowperformanceinlimitfedcowcalfsystems
AT sawyerje effectoffeedingmethodonnutrientutilizationandcowperformanceinlimitfedcowcalfsystems
AT trubenbachla effectoffeedingmethodonnutrientutilizationandcowperformanceinlimitfedcowcalfsystems
AT wickershamta effectoffeedingmethodonnutrientutilizationandcowperformanceinlimitfedcowcalfsystems