Cargando…
Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies
A new method for automated sleep stage scoring of polysomnographies is proposed that uses a random forest approach to model feature interactions and temporal effects. The model mostly relies on features based on the rules from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, which allows medical experts to g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.707589 |
_version_ | 1784584983078240256 |
---|---|
author | Van der Plas, Dries Verbraecken, Johan Willemen, Marc Meert, Wannes Davis, Jesse |
author_facet | Van der Plas, Dries Verbraecken, Johan Willemen, Marc Meert, Wannes Davis, Jesse |
author_sort | Van der Plas, Dries |
collection | PubMed |
description | A new method for automated sleep stage scoring of polysomnographies is proposed that uses a random forest approach to model feature interactions and temporal effects. The model mostly relies on features based on the rules from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, which allows medical experts to gain insights into the model. A common way to evaluate automated approaches to constructing hypnograms is to compare the one produced by the algorithm to an expert's hypnogram. However, given the same data, two expert annotators will construct (slightly) different hypnograms due to differing interpretations of the data or individual mistakes. A thorough evaluation of our method is performed on a multi-labeled dataset in which both the inter-rater variability as well as the prediction uncertainties are taken into account, leading to a new standard for the evaluation of automated sleep stage scoring algorithms. On all epochs, our model achieves an accuracy of 82.7%, which is only slightly lower than the inter-rater disagreement. When only considering the 63.3% of the epochs where both the experts and algorithm are certain, the model achieves an accuracy of 97.8%. Transition periods between sleep stages are identified and studied for the first time. Scoring guidelines for medical experts are provided to complement the certain predictions by scoring only a few epochs manually. This makes the proposed method highly time-efficient while guaranteeing a highly accurate final hypnogram. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8521900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85219002021-10-27 Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies Van der Plas, Dries Verbraecken, Johan Willemen, Marc Meert, Wannes Davis, Jesse Front Digit Health Digital Health A new method for automated sleep stage scoring of polysomnographies is proposed that uses a random forest approach to model feature interactions and temporal effects. The model mostly relies on features based on the rules from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, which allows medical experts to gain insights into the model. A common way to evaluate automated approaches to constructing hypnograms is to compare the one produced by the algorithm to an expert's hypnogram. However, given the same data, two expert annotators will construct (slightly) different hypnograms due to differing interpretations of the data or individual mistakes. A thorough evaluation of our method is performed on a multi-labeled dataset in which both the inter-rater variability as well as the prediction uncertainties are taken into account, leading to a new standard for the evaluation of automated sleep stage scoring algorithms. On all epochs, our model achieves an accuracy of 82.7%, which is only slightly lower than the inter-rater disagreement. When only considering the 63.3% of the epochs where both the experts and algorithm are certain, the model achieves an accuracy of 97.8%. Transition periods between sleep stages are identified and studied for the first time. Scoring guidelines for medical experts are provided to complement the certain predictions by scoring only a few epochs manually. This makes the proposed method highly time-efficient while guaranteeing a highly accurate final hypnogram. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8521900/ /pubmed/34713177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.707589 Text en Copyright © 2021 Van der Plas, Verbraecken, Willemen, Meert and Davis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Digital Health Van der Plas, Dries Verbraecken, Johan Willemen, Marc Meert, Wannes Davis, Jesse Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title | Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title_full | Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title_short | Evaluation of Automated Hypnogram Analysis on Multi-Scored Polysomnographies |
title_sort | evaluation of automated hypnogram analysis on multi-scored polysomnographies |
topic | Digital Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.707589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderplasdries evaluationofautomatedhypnogramanalysisonmultiscoredpolysomnographies AT verbraeckenjohan evaluationofautomatedhypnogramanalysisonmultiscoredpolysomnographies AT willemenmarc evaluationofautomatedhypnogramanalysisonmultiscoredpolysomnographies AT meertwannes evaluationofautomatedhypnogramanalysisonmultiscoredpolysomnographies AT davisjesse evaluationofautomatedhypnogramanalysisonmultiscoredpolysomnographies |