Cargando…

Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective

Background: Access to digital health technologies is contributing to a paradigm shift where sickcare may become authentic healthcare. Individuals can now access personal health data through wearable sensors, affordable lab screenings, genetic and genomic sequencing, and real-time health tracking app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nebeker, Camille, Weisberg, Bethany, Hekler, Eric, Kurisu, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00002
_version_ 1784585006165786624
author Nebeker, Camille
Weisberg, Bethany
Hekler, Eric
Kurisu, Michael
author_facet Nebeker, Camille
Weisberg, Bethany
Hekler, Eric
Kurisu, Michael
author_sort Nebeker, Camille
collection PubMed
description Background: Access to digital health technologies is contributing to a paradigm shift where sickcare may become authentic healthcare. Individuals can now access personal health data through wearable sensors, affordable lab screenings, genetic and genomic sequencing, and real-time health tracking apps. Personal health data access creates opportunities to study health indicators 24/7 and in real time. This is especially useful for patients with hard-to-diagnose or treat diseases, which led to a self-formed patient group called Project Apollo. Project Apollo is composed of highly motivated patients with common experiences of undiagnosed conditions, a lack of clear treatment options, and shared frustrations with navigating the U.S. healthcare system. These experiences have led the Apollo cohort to supplement their health knowledge through self-study research. Objective: To qualify the experience and expectations of patients affiliated with Project Apollo. Methods: A qualitative approach involved record review and semi-structured interviews. One-hour semi-structured interviews were conducted to solicit motivations, expectations, and potential barriers and facilitators to self-study followed by a brief survey on digital tool use. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes and patterns. Results: Participants included six females and three males ranging in age from 30 to 70+ years. Responses were organized under five key themes including: frustration with healthcare system; community support; self-study/N-of-1 research; access to experts; moving from sick to healthcare. Facilitators include motivation, albeit stemming from frustration, a safe community where patients derive support, and access to experts for guidance. Increasing awareness of clinicians about the potential value of partnering with patients who are advancing health knowledge through self-study is critical. Conclusions: N-of-1 self-study research, coupled with community support and digital health tools, appears to be one plausible pathway to shifting the paradigm from sickcare toward patient-partnered healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85220032021-10-27 Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective Nebeker, Camille Weisberg, Bethany Hekler, Eric Kurisu, Michael Front Digit Health Digital Health Background: Access to digital health technologies is contributing to a paradigm shift where sickcare may become authentic healthcare. Individuals can now access personal health data through wearable sensors, affordable lab screenings, genetic and genomic sequencing, and real-time health tracking apps. Personal health data access creates opportunities to study health indicators 24/7 and in real time. This is especially useful for patients with hard-to-diagnose or treat diseases, which led to a self-formed patient group called Project Apollo. Project Apollo is composed of highly motivated patients with common experiences of undiagnosed conditions, a lack of clear treatment options, and shared frustrations with navigating the U.S. healthcare system. These experiences have led the Apollo cohort to supplement their health knowledge through self-study research. Objective: To qualify the experience and expectations of patients affiliated with Project Apollo. Methods: A qualitative approach involved record review and semi-structured interviews. One-hour semi-structured interviews were conducted to solicit motivations, expectations, and potential barriers and facilitators to self-study followed by a brief survey on digital tool use. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes and patterns. Results: Participants included six females and three males ranging in age from 30 to 70+ years. Responses were organized under five key themes including: frustration with healthcare system; community support; self-study/N-of-1 research; access to experts; moving from sick to healthcare. Facilitators include motivation, albeit stemming from frustration, a safe community where patients derive support, and access to experts for guidance. Increasing awareness of clinicians about the potential value of partnering with patients who are advancing health knowledge through self-study is critical. Conclusions: N-of-1 self-study research, coupled with community support and digital health tools, appears to be one plausible pathway to shifting the paradigm from sickcare toward patient-partnered healthcare. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8522003/ /pubmed/34713016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00002 Text en Copyright © 2020 Nebeker, Weisberg, Hekler and Kurisu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Nebeker, Camille
Weisberg, Bethany
Hekler, Eric
Kurisu, Michael
Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title_full Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title_fullStr Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title_short Using Self-Study and Peer-to-Peer Support to Change “Sick” Care to “Health” Care: The Patient Perspective
title_sort using self-study and peer-to-peer support to change “sick” care to “health” care: the patient perspective
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00002
work_keys_str_mv AT nebekercamille usingselfstudyandpeertopeersupporttochangesickcaretohealthcarethepatientperspective
AT weisbergbethany usingselfstudyandpeertopeersupporttochangesickcaretohealthcarethepatientperspective
AT heklereric usingselfstudyandpeertopeersupporttochangesickcaretohealthcarethepatientperspective
AT kurisumichael usingselfstudyandpeertopeersupporttochangesickcaretohealthcarethepatientperspective