Cargando…

Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey

Rationale: Restriction or prohibition of family visiting intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses substantial barriers to communication and family- and patient-centered care. Objectives: To understand how communication among families, patients, and the ICU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Louise, Yu, Lisa, Casey, Joseph, Cook, Amelia, Metaxa, Victoria, Pattison, Natalie, Rafferty, Anne Marie, Ramsay, Pam, Saha, Sian, Xyrichis, Andreas, Meyer, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202012-1500OC
_version_ 1784585061196103680
author Rose, Louise
Yu, Lisa
Casey, Joseph
Cook, Amelia
Metaxa, Victoria
Pattison, Natalie
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Ramsay, Pam
Saha, Sian
Xyrichis, Andreas
Meyer, Joel
author_facet Rose, Louise
Yu, Lisa
Casey, Joseph
Cook, Amelia
Metaxa, Victoria
Pattison, Natalie
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Ramsay, Pam
Saha, Sian
Xyrichis, Andreas
Meyer, Joel
author_sort Rose, Louise
collection PubMed
description Rationale: Restriction or prohibition of family visiting intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses substantial barriers to communication and family- and patient-centered care. Objectives: To understand how communication among families, patients, and the ICU team was enabled during the pandemic. The secondary objectives were to understand strategies used to facilitate virtual visiting and associated benefits and barriers. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional, and self-administered electronic survey was sent (June 2020) to all 217 UK hospitals with at least one ICU. Results: The survey response rate was 54%; 117 of 217 hospitals (182 ICUs) responded. All hospitals imposed visiting restrictions, with visits not permitted under any circumstance in 16% of hospitals (28 ICUs); 63% (112 ICUs) of hospitals permitted family presence at the end of life. The responsibility for communicating with families shifted with decreased bedside nurse involvement. A dedicated ICU family-liaison team was established in 50% (106 ICUs) of hospitals. All but three hospitals instituted virtual visiting, although there was substantial heterogeneity in the videoconferencing platform used. Unconscious or sedated ICU patients were deemed ineligible for virtual visits in 23% of ICUs. Patients at the end of life were deemed ineligible for virtual visits in 7% of ICUs. Commonly reported benefits of virtual visiting were reducing patient psychological distress (78%), improving staff morale (68%), and reorientation of patients with delirium (47%). Common barriers to virtual visiting were related to insufficient staff time, rapid implementation of videoconferencing technology, and challenges associated with family members’ ability to use videoconferencing technology or access a device. Conclusions: Virtual visiting and dedicated communication teams were common COVID-19 pandemic innovations addressing the restrictions to family ICU visiting, and they resulted in valuable benefits in terms of patient recovery and staff morale. Enhancing access and developing a more consistent approach to family virtual ICU visits could improve the quality of care, both during and outside of pandemic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85222892021-10-18 Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey Rose, Louise Yu, Lisa Casey, Joseph Cook, Amelia Metaxa, Victoria Pattison, Natalie Rafferty, Anne Marie Ramsay, Pam Saha, Sian Xyrichis, Andreas Meyer, Joel Ann Am Thorac Soc Original Research Rationale: Restriction or prohibition of family visiting intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic poses substantial barriers to communication and family- and patient-centered care. Objectives: To understand how communication among families, patients, and the ICU team was enabled during the pandemic. The secondary objectives were to understand strategies used to facilitate virtual visiting and associated benefits and barriers. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional, and self-administered electronic survey was sent (June 2020) to all 217 UK hospitals with at least one ICU. Results: The survey response rate was 54%; 117 of 217 hospitals (182 ICUs) responded. All hospitals imposed visiting restrictions, with visits not permitted under any circumstance in 16% of hospitals (28 ICUs); 63% (112 ICUs) of hospitals permitted family presence at the end of life. The responsibility for communicating with families shifted with decreased bedside nurse involvement. A dedicated ICU family-liaison team was established in 50% (106 ICUs) of hospitals. All but three hospitals instituted virtual visiting, although there was substantial heterogeneity in the videoconferencing platform used. Unconscious or sedated ICU patients were deemed ineligible for virtual visits in 23% of ICUs. Patients at the end of life were deemed ineligible for virtual visits in 7% of ICUs. Commonly reported benefits of virtual visiting were reducing patient psychological distress (78%), improving staff morale (68%), and reorientation of patients with delirium (47%). Common barriers to virtual visiting were related to insufficient staff time, rapid implementation of videoconferencing technology, and challenges associated with family members’ ability to use videoconferencing technology or access a device. Conclusions: Virtual visiting and dedicated communication teams were common COVID-19 pandemic innovations addressing the restrictions to family ICU visiting, and they resulted in valuable benefits in terms of patient recovery and staff morale. Enhancing access and developing a more consistent approach to family virtual ICU visits could improve the quality of care, both during and outside of pandemic conditions. American Thoracic Society 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8522289/ /pubmed/33617747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202012-1500OC Text en Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rose, Louise
Yu, Lisa
Casey, Joseph
Cook, Amelia
Metaxa, Victoria
Pattison, Natalie
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Ramsay, Pam
Saha, Sian
Xyrichis, Andreas
Meyer, Joel
Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title_full Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title_fullStr Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title_full_unstemmed Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title_short Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey
title_sort communication and virtual visiting for families of patients in intensive care during the covid-19 pandemic: a uk national survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33617747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202012-1500OC
work_keys_str_mv AT roselouise communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT yulisa communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT caseyjoseph communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT cookamelia communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT metaxavictoria communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT pattisonnatalie communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT raffertyannemarie communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT ramsaypam communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT sahasian communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT xyrichisandreas communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey
AT meyerjoel communicationandvirtualvisitingforfamiliesofpatientsinintensivecareduringthecovid19pandemicauknationalsurvey