Cargando…

Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods

BACKGROUND: Anterior nasal swabs (ANS) are established specimen collection methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detection. While saliva (SA) specimens provide an alternative, few studies have comprehensively characterized the performance of SA specimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grijalva, Carlos G, Rolfes, Melissa, Zhu, Yuwei, Chappell, James, Halasa, Natasha, Kim, Ahra, Reed, Carrie, Fry, Alicia, Talbot, H Keipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab484
_version_ 1784585080424890368
author Grijalva, Carlos G
Rolfes, Melissa
Zhu, Yuwei
Chappell, James
Halasa, Natasha
Kim, Ahra
Reed, Carrie
Fry, Alicia
Talbot, H Keipp
author_facet Grijalva, Carlos G
Rolfes, Melissa
Zhu, Yuwei
Chappell, James
Halasa, Natasha
Kim, Ahra
Reed, Carrie
Fry, Alicia
Talbot, H Keipp
author_sort Grijalva, Carlos G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior nasal swabs (ANS) are established specimen collection methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detection. While saliva (SA) specimens provide an alternative, few studies have comprehensively characterized the performance of SA specimens in longitudinal studies. METHODS: We compared SARS-CoV-2 detections between paired self-collected ANS and SA specimens from a household transmission study. Participants recorded symptoms and paired ANS and SA specimens daily for 14 days. Specimens were tested using RT-PCR. We calculated the proportion of detections identified by each specimen type among the detections from both types combined. We computed percent agreement and Kappa statistics to assess concordance in detections. We also computed estimates stratified by presence of symptoms and examined the influence of traditional and inactivating transport media on the performance of ANS. RESULTS: We examined 2535 self-collected paired specimens from 216 participants. Among 1238 (49%) paired specimens with detections by either specimen type, ANS identified 77.1% (954; 95% CI, 74.6% to 79.3%) and SA 81.9% (1014; 95% CI, 79.7% to 84.0%), with a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 8.5%). Overall agreement was 80.0%, and Kappa was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.6). Nevertheless, the difference in the proportion of detections identified by ANS and SA using traditional and inactivating transport media was 32.5% (95% CI, 26.8% to 38.0%) and –9.5% (95% CI, −13.7% to –5.2%), respectively. Among participants who remained asymptomatic, the difference in detections between SA and ANS was 51.2% (95% CI, 31.8% to 66.0%) and 26.1% (95% CI, 0% to 48.5%) using traditional and inactivating media, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected saliva specimens provide a noninvasive alternative to nasal swabs, especially to those collected in traditional transport media, for longitudinal field studies that aim to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85223952021-10-20 Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods Grijalva, Carlos G Rolfes, Melissa Zhu, Yuwei Chappell, James Halasa, Natasha Kim, Ahra Reed, Carrie Fry, Alicia Talbot, H Keipp Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Anterior nasal swabs (ANS) are established specimen collection methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detection. While saliva (SA) specimens provide an alternative, few studies have comprehensively characterized the performance of SA specimens in longitudinal studies. METHODS: We compared SARS-CoV-2 detections between paired self-collected ANS and SA specimens from a household transmission study. Participants recorded symptoms and paired ANS and SA specimens daily for 14 days. Specimens were tested using RT-PCR. We calculated the proportion of detections identified by each specimen type among the detections from both types combined. We computed percent agreement and Kappa statistics to assess concordance in detections. We also computed estimates stratified by presence of symptoms and examined the influence of traditional and inactivating transport media on the performance of ANS. RESULTS: We examined 2535 self-collected paired specimens from 216 participants. Among 1238 (49%) paired specimens with detections by either specimen type, ANS identified 77.1% (954; 95% CI, 74.6% to 79.3%) and SA 81.9% (1014; 95% CI, 79.7% to 84.0%), with a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 8.5%). Overall agreement was 80.0%, and Kappa was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.6). Nevertheless, the difference in the proportion of detections identified by ANS and SA using traditional and inactivating transport media was 32.5% (95% CI, 26.8% to 38.0%) and –9.5% (95% CI, −13.7% to –5.2%), respectively. Among participants who remained asymptomatic, the difference in detections between SA and ANS was 51.2% (95% CI, 31.8% to 66.0%) and 26.1% (95% CI, 0% to 48.5%) using traditional and inactivating media, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Self-collected saliva specimens provide a noninvasive alternative to nasal swabs, especially to those collected in traditional transport media, for longitudinal field studies that aim to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Oxford University Press 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8522395/ /pubmed/34796245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab484 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Grijalva, Carlos G
Rolfes, Melissa
Zhu, Yuwei
Chappell, James
Halasa, Natasha
Kim, Ahra
Reed, Carrie
Fry, Alicia
Talbot, H Keipp
Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title_full Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title_fullStr Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title_short Performance of Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs and Saliva Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 During Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Periods
title_sort performance of self-collected anterior nasal swabs and saliva specimens for detection of sars-cov-2 during symptomatic and asymptomatic periods
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab484
work_keys_str_mv AT grijalvacarlosg performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT rolfesmelissa performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT zhuyuwei performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT chappelljames performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT halasanatasha performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT kimahra performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT reedcarrie performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT fryalicia performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods
AT talbothkeipp performanceofselfcollectedanteriornasalswabsandsalivaspecimensfordetectionofsarscov2duringsymptomaticandasymptomaticperiods