Cargando…
Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506 |
_version_ | 1784585086378704896 |
---|---|
author | Lofgren, Sarah M Okafor, Elizabeth C Colette, Alanna A Pastick, Katelyn A Skipper, Caleb P Pullen, Matthew F Nicol, Melanie R Bold, Tyler D Bangdiwala, Ananta S Engen, Nicole W Collins, Lindsey B Williams, Darlisha A Axelrod, Margaret L Thielen, Beth K Hullsiek, Kathy H Boulware, David R Rajasingham, Radha |
author_facet | Lofgren, Sarah M Okafor, Elizabeth C Colette, Alanna A Pastick, Katelyn A Skipper, Caleb P Pullen, Matthew F Nicol, Melanie R Bold, Tyler D Bangdiwala, Ananta S Engen, Nicole W Collins, Lindsey B Williams, Darlisha A Axelrod, Margaret L Thielen, Beth K Hullsiek, Kathy H Boulware, David R Rajasingham, Radha |
author_sort | Lofgren, Sarah M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing in outpatients to assess seropositivity. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted 3 internet-based randomized clinical trials and offered serologic testing via self-collected DBS as a voluntary substudy. COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition with epidemiological link to cases. A minority reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at an outside facility. We tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin via antibody detection by agglutination–PCR (ADAP) and compared the results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Of 2727 participants in the primary studies, 60% (1648/2727) consented for serology testing; 56% (931/1648) returned a usable DBS sample. Of those who were asymptomatic, 5% (33/707) had positive ADAP serology. Of participants with a positive PCR, 67% (36/54) had positive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. None of those who were PCR-positive and asymptomatic were seropositive (0/7). Of 77 specimens tested for concordance via ELISA, 83% (64/77) were concordant. The challenges of completing a remote testing program during a pandemic included sourcing and assembling collection kits, delivery and return of the kits, and troubleshooting testing. Self-collection was successful for >95% of participants. Delays in US mail with possible sample degradation and timing of DBS collection complicated the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found remote antibody testing during a global pandemic feasible although challenging. We identified an association between symptomatic COVID-19 and positive antibody results at a similar prevalence as other outpatient cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8522439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85224392021-10-20 Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials Lofgren, Sarah M Okafor, Elizabeth C Colette, Alanna A Pastick, Katelyn A Skipper, Caleb P Pullen, Matthew F Nicol, Melanie R Bold, Tyler D Bangdiwala, Ananta S Engen, Nicole W Collins, Lindsey B Williams, Darlisha A Axelrod, Margaret L Thielen, Beth K Hullsiek, Kathy H Boulware, David R Rajasingham, Radha Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing in outpatients to assess seropositivity. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted 3 internet-based randomized clinical trials and offered serologic testing via self-collected DBS as a voluntary substudy. COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition with epidemiological link to cases. A minority reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at an outside facility. We tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin via antibody detection by agglutination–PCR (ADAP) and compared the results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Of 2727 participants in the primary studies, 60% (1648/2727) consented for serology testing; 56% (931/1648) returned a usable DBS sample. Of those who were asymptomatic, 5% (33/707) had positive ADAP serology. Of participants with a positive PCR, 67% (36/54) had positive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. None of those who were PCR-positive and asymptomatic were seropositive (0/7). Of 77 specimens tested for concordance via ELISA, 83% (64/77) were concordant. The challenges of completing a remote testing program during a pandemic included sourcing and assembling collection kits, delivery and return of the kits, and troubleshooting testing. Self-collection was successful for >95% of participants. Delays in US mail with possible sample degradation and timing of DBS collection complicated the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found remote antibody testing during a global pandemic feasible although challenging. We identified an association between symptomatic COVID-19 and positive antibody results at a similar prevalence as other outpatient cohorts. Oxford University Press 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8522439/ /pubmed/35548171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Articles Lofgren, Sarah M Okafor, Elizabeth C Colette, Alanna A Pastick, Katelyn A Skipper, Caleb P Pullen, Matthew F Nicol, Melanie R Bold, Tyler D Bangdiwala, Ananta S Engen, Nicole W Collins, Lindsey B Williams, Darlisha A Axelrod, Margaret L Thielen, Beth K Hullsiek, Kathy H Boulware, David R Rajasingham, Radha Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title | Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title_full | Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title_short | Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials |
title_sort | feasibility of sars-cov-2 antibody testing in remote outpatient trials |
topic | Major Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lofgrensarahm feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT okaforelizabethc feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT colettealannaa feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT pastickkatelyna feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT skippercalebp feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT pullenmatthewf feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT nicolmelanier feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT boldtylerd feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT bangdiwalaanantas feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT engennicolew feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT collinslindseyb feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT williamsdarlishaa feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT axelrodmargaretl feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT thielenbethk feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT hullsiekkathyh feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT boulwaredavidr feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials AT rajasinghamradha feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials |