Cargando…

Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lofgren, Sarah M, Okafor, Elizabeth C, Colette, Alanna A, Pastick, Katelyn A, Skipper, Caleb P, Pullen, Matthew F, Nicol, Melanie R, Bold, Tyler D, Bangdiwala, Ananta S, Engen, Nicole W, Collins, Lindsey B, Williams, Darlisha A, Axelrod, Margaret L, Thielen, Beth K, Hullsiek, Kathy H, Boulware, David R, Rajasingham, Radha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506
_version_ 1784585086378704896
author Lofgren, Sarah M
Okafor, Elizabeth C
Colette, Alanna A
Pastick, Katelyn A
Skipper, Caleb P
Pullen, Matthew F
Nicol, Melanie R
Bold, Tyler D
Bangdiwala, Ananta S
Engen, Nicole W
Collins, Lindsey B
Williams, Darlisha A
Axelrod, Margaret L
Thielen, Beth K
Hullsiek, Kathy H
Boulware, David R
Rajasingham, Radha
author_facet Lofgren, Sarah M
Okafor, Elizabeth C
Colette, Alanna A
Pastick, Katelyn A
Skipper, Caleb P
Pullen, Matthew F
Nicol, Melanie R
Bold, Tyler D
Bangdiwala, Ananta S
Engen, Nicole W
Collins, Lindsey B
Williams, Darlisha A
Axelrod, Margaret L
Thielen, Beth K
Hullsiek, Kathy H
Boulware, David R
Rajasingham, Radha
author_sort Lofgren, Sarah M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing in outpatients to assess seropositivity. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted 3 internet-based randomized clinical trials and offered serologic testing via self-collected DBS as a voluntary substudy. COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition with epidemiological link to cases. A minority reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at an outside facility. We tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin via antibody detection by agglutination–PCR (ADAP) and compared the results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Of 2727 participants in the primary studies, 60% (1648/2727) consented for serology testing; 56% (931/1648) returned a usable DBS sample. Of those who were asymptomatic, 5% (33/707) had positive ADAP serology. Of participants with a positive PCR, 67% (36/54) had positive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. None of those who were PCR-positive and asymptomatic were seropositive (0/7). Of 77 specimens tested for concordance via ELISA, 83% (64/77) were concordant. The challenges of completing a remote testing program during a pandemic included sourcing and assembling collection kits, delivery and return of the kits, and troubleshooting testing. Self-collection was successful for >95% of participants. Delays in US mail with possible sample degradation and timing of DBS collection complicated the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found remote antibody testing during a global pandemic feasible although challenging. We identified an association between symptomatic COVID-19 and positive antibody results at a similar prevalence as other outpatient cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85224392021-10-20 Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials Lofgren, Sarah M Okafor, Elizabeth C Colette, Alanna A Pastick, Katelyn A Skipper, Caleb P Pullen, Matthew F Nicol, Melanie R Bold, Tyler D Bangdiwala, Ananta S Engen, Nicole W Collins, Lindsey B Williams, Darlisha A Axelrod, Margaret L Thielen, Beth K Hullsiek, Kathy H Boulware, David R Rajasingham, Radha Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical trials necessitated rapid testing to be performed remotely. Dried blood spot (DBS) techniques have enabled remote HIV virologic testing globally, and more recently, antibody testing as well. We evaluated DBS testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing in outpatients to assess seropositivity. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted 3 internet-based randomized clinical trials and offered serologic testing via self-collected DBS as a voluntary substudy. COVID-19 diagnosis was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition with epidemiological link to cases. A minority reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at an outside facility. We tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin via antibody detection by agglutination–PCR (ADAP) and compared the results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Of 2727 participants in the primary studies, 60% (1648/2727) consented for serology testing; 56% (931/1648) returned a usable DBS sample. Of those who were asymptomatic, 5% (33/707) had positive ADAP serology. Of participants with a positive PCR, 67% (36/54) had positive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. None of those who were PCR-positive and asymptomatic were seropositive (0/7). Of 77 specimens tested for concordance via ELISA, 83% (64/77) were concordant. The challenges of completing a remote testing program during a pandemic included sourcing and assembling collection kits, delivery and return of the kits, and troubleshooting testing. Self-collection was successful for >95% of participants. Delays in US mail with possible sample degradation and timing of DBS collection complicated the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found remote antibody testing during a global pandemic feasible although challenging. We identified an association between symptomatic COVID-19 and positive antibody results at a similar prevalence as other outpatient cohorts. Oxford University Press 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8522439/ /pubmed/35548171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Lofgren, Sarah M
Okafor, Elizabeth C
Colette, Alanna A
Pastick, Katelyn A
Skipper, Caleb P
Pullen, Matthew F
Nicol, Melanie R
Bold, Tyler D
Bangdiwala, Ananta S
Engen, Nicole W
Collins, Lindsey B
Williams, Darlisha A
Axelrod, Margaret L
Thielen, Beth K
Hullsiek, Kathy H
Boulware, David R
Rajasingham, Radha
Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title_full Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title_fullStr Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title_short Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Remote Outpatient Trials
title_sort feasibility of sars-cov-2 antibody testing in remote outpatient trials
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab506
work_keys_str_mv AT lofgrensarahm feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT okaforelizabethc feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT colettealannaa feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT pastickkatelyna feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT skippercalebp feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT pullenmatthewf feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT nicolmelanier feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT boldtylerd feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT bangdiwalaanantas feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT engennicolew feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT collinslindseyb feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT williamsdarlishaa feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT axelrodmargaretl feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT thielenbethk feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT hullsiekkathyh feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT boulwaredavidr feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials
AT rajasinghamradha feasibilityofsarscov2antibodytestinginremoteoutpatienttrials