Cargando…

Data Quality Improvement and Internal Data Audit of the Chinese Neonatal Network Data Collection System

Background: The Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN) is a nationwide neonatal network that aims to improve clinical neonatal care quality and short- and long-term health outcomes of infants. This study aims to assess the quality of the Chinese Neonatal Network database by conducting an internal audit of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Jianhua, Cao, Yun, Hei, Mingyan, Sun, Huiqing, Wang, Laishuan, Zhou, Wei, Chen, Xiafang, Jiang, Siyuan, Zhang, Huayan, Ma, Xiaolu, Wu, Hui, Li, Xiaoying, Shi, Yuan, Gu, Xinyue, Wang, Yanchen, Yang, Tongling, Lu, Yulan, Zhou, Wenhao, Chen, Chao, Lee, Shoo K., Du, Lizhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.711200
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN) is a nationwide neonatal network that aims to improve clinical neonatal care quality and short- and long-term health outcomes of infants. This study aims to assess the quality of the Chinese Neonatal Network database by conducting an internal audit of data extraction. Methods: A data audit was performed by independently replicating the data collection and entry process in all 58 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICU) participating in the CHNN. Eighty-eight data elements selected for re-abstraction were classified into three categories (critical, important, less important), and agreement rates for original and re-abstracted data were predefined. Three to five records were randomly selected at each site for re-abstraction, including one short- (0–7 days), two medium- (8–28 days), and two long-stay (more than 28 days) cases. Agreement rates for each data item were calculated for individual NICUs and across the network, respectively. Results: A total of 283 cases and 24,904 data fields were re-abstracted. The agreement rates for original and re-abstracted data elements were 96.1% overall, and 97.2, 94.3, and 96.6% for critical, important, and less important data elements, respectively. Individual site variation for discrepancies ranged between 0.0 and 18.4% for all collected data elements. Conclusion: The completeness, precision, and quality of data in the CHNN database are high, providing assurance for multipurpose use, including health service evaluation, quality improvement, clinical trials, and other research.