Cargando…

Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: The HeartLogic algorithm combines multiple implantable cardioverter-defibrillator sensors to identify patients at risk of heart failure (HF) events. We sought to evaluate the risk stratification ability of this algorithm in clinical practice. We also analyzed the alert management strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calò, Leonardo, Bianchi, Valter, Ferraioli, Donatella, Santini, Luca, Dello Russo, Antonio, Carriere, Cosimo, Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio, Andreoli, Chiara, La Greca, Carmelo, Arena, Giuseppe, Talarico, Antonello, Pisanò, Ennio, Santoro, Amato, Giammaria, Massimo, Ziacchi, Matteo, Viscusi, Miguel, De Ruvo, Ermenegildo, Campari, Monica, Valsecchi, Sergio, D’Onofrio, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008134
_version_ 1784585123139682304
author Calò, Leonardo
Bianchi, Valter
Ferraioli, Donatella
Santini, Luca
Dello Russo, Antonio
Carriere, Cosimo
Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio
Andreoli, Chiara
La Greca, Carmelo
Arena, Giuseppe
Talarico, Antonello
Pisanò, Ennio
Santoro, Amato
Giammaria, Massimo
Ziacchi, Matteo
Viscusi, Miguel
De Ruvo, Ermenegildo
Campari, Monica
Valsecchi, Sergio
D’Onofrio, Antonio
author_facet Calò, Leonardo
Bianchi, Valter
Ferraioli, Donatella
Santini, Luca
Dello Russo, Antonio
Carriere, Cosimo
Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio
Andreoli, Chiara
La Greca, Carmelo
Arena, Giuseppe
Talarico, Antonello
Pisanò, Ennio
Santoro, Amato
Giammaria, Massimo
Ziacchi, Matteo
Viscusi, Miguel
De Ruvo, Ermenegildo
Campari, Monica
Valsecchi, Sergio
D’Onofrio, Antonio
author_sort Calò, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The HeartLogic algorithm combines multiple implantable cardioverter-defibrillator sensors to identify patients at risk of heart failure (HF) events. We sought to evaluate the risk stratification ability of this algorithm in clinical practice. We also analyzed the alert management strategies adopted in the study group and their association with the occurrence of HF events. METHODS: The HeartLogic feature was activated in 366 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients at 22 centers. The median follow-up was 11 months [25th–75th percentile: 6–16]. The HeartLogic algorithm calculates a daily HF index and identifies periods IN alert state on the basis of a configurable threshold. RESULTS: The HeartLogic index crossed the threshold value 273 times (0.76 alerts/patient-year) in 150 patients. The time IN alert state was 11% of the total observation period. Patients experienced 36 HF hospitalizations, and 8 patients died of HF during the observation period. Thirty-five events were associated with the IN alert state (0.92 events/patient-year versus 0.03 events/patient-year in the OUT of alert state). The hazard ratio in the IN/OUT of alert state comparison was (hazard ratio, 24.53 [95% CI, 8.55–70.38], P<0.001), after adjustment for baseline clinical confounders. Alerts followed by clinical actions were associated with less HF events (hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14–0.99], P=0.047). No differences in event rates were observed between in-office and remote alert management. CONCLUSIONS: This multiparametric algorithm identifies patients during periods of significantly increased risk of HF events. The rate of HF events seemed lower when clinical actions were undertaken in response to alerts. Extra in-office visits did not seem to be required to effectively manage HeartLogic alerts. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02275637.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85226252021-10-20 Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice Calò, Leonardo Bianchi, Valter Ferraioli, Donatella Santini, Luca Dello Russo, Antonio Carriere, Cosimo Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio Andreoli, Chiara La Greca, Carmelo Arena, Giuseppe Talarico, Antonello Pisanò, Ennio Santoro, Amato Giammaria, Massimo Ziacchi, Matteo Viscusi, Miguel De Ruvo, Ermenegildo Campari, Monica Valsecchi, Sergio D’Onofrio, Antonio Circ Heart Fail Original Articles BACKGROUND: The HeartLogic algorithm combines multiple implantable cardioverter-defibrillator sensors to identify patients at risk of heart failure (HF) events. We sought to evaluate the risk stratification ability of this algorithm in clinical practice. We also analyzed the alert management strategies adopted in the study group and their association with the occurrence of HF events. METHODS: The HeartLogic feature was activated in 366 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients at 22 centers. The median follow-up was 11 months [25th–75th percentile: 6–16]. The HeartLogic algorithm calculates a daily HF index and identifies periods IN alert state on the basis of a configurable threshold. RESULTS: The HeartLogic index crossed the threshold value 273 times (0.76 alerts/patient-year) in 150 patients. The time IN alert state was 11% of the total observation period. Patients experienced 36 HF hospitalizations, and 8 patients died of HF during the observation period. Thirty-five events were associated with the IN alert state (0.92 events/patient-year versus 0.03 events/patient-year in the OUT of alert state). The hazard ratio in the IN/OUT of alert state comparison was (hazard ratio, 24.53 [95% CI, 8.55–70.38], P<0.001), after adjustment for baseline clinical confounders. Alerts followed by clinical actions were associated with less HF events (hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14–0.99], P=0.047). No differences in event rates were observed between in-office and remote alert management. CONCLUSIONS: This multiparametric algorithm identifies patients during periods of significantly increased risk of HF events. The rate of HF events seemed lower when clinical actions were undertaken in response to alerts. Extra in-office visits did not seem to be required to effectively manage HeartLogic alerts. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02275637. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8522625/ /pubmed/34190592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008134 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Circulation: Heart Failure is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Calò, Leonardo
Bianchi, Valter
Ferraioli, Donatella
Santini, Luca
Dello Russo, Antonio
Carriere, Cosimo
Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio
Andreoli, Chiara
La Greca, Carmelo
Arena, Giuseppe
Talarico, Antonello
Pisanò, Ennio
Santoro, Amato
Giammaria, Massimo
Ziacchi, Matteo
Viscusi, Miguel
De Ruvo, Ermenegildo
Campari, Monica
Valsecchi, Sergio
D’Onofrio, Antonio
Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title_full Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title_short Multiparametric Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Algorithm for Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Management: An Analysis in Clinical Practice
title_sort multiparametric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithm for heart failure risk stratification and management: an analysis in clinical practice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008134
work_keys_str_mv AT caloleonardo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT bianchivalter multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT ferraiolidonatella multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT santiniluca multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT dellorussoantonio multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT carrierecosimo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT santobuonovincenzoezio multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT andreolichiara multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT lagrecacarmelo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT arenagiuseppe multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT talaricoantonello multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT pisanoennio multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT santoroamato multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT giammariamassimo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT ziacchimatteo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT viscusimiguel multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT deruvoermenegildo multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT camparimonica multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT valsecchisergio multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice
AT donofrioantonio multiparametricimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatoralgorithmforheartfailureriskstratificationandmanagementananalysisinclinicalpractice