Cargando…
How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007 |
_version_ | 1784585148559261696 |
---|---|
author | Devi, Reena Chadborn, Neil H Meyer, Julienne Banerjee, Jay Goodman, Claire Dening, Tom Gladman, John R F Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Usman, Adeela Housley, Gemma Lewis, Sarah Glover, Matthew Gage, Heather Logan, Philippa A Martin, Finbarr C Gordon, Adam L |
author_facet | Devi, Reena Chadborn, Neil H Meyer, Julienne Banerjee, Jay Goodman, Claire Dening, Tom Gladman, John R F Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Usman, Adeela Housley, Gemma Lewis, Sarah Glover, Matthew Gage, Heather Logan, Philippa A Martin, Finbarr C Gordon, Adam L |
author_sort | Devi, Reena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. RESULTS: QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. CONCLUSIONS: These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8522714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85227142021-10-19 How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation Devi, Reena Chadborn, Neil H Meyer, Julienne Banerjee, Jay Goodman, Claire Dening, Tom Gladman, John R F Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Usman, Adeela Housley, Gemma Lewis, Sarah Glover, Matthew Gage, Heather Logan, Philippa A Martin, Finbarr C Gordon, Adam L Age Ageing Qualitative Paper BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. RESULTS: QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. CONCLUSIONS: These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI. Oxford University Press 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8522714/ /pubmed/33596305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Paper Devi, Reena Chadborn, Neil H Meyer, Julienne Banerjee, Jay Goodman, Claire Dening, Tom Gladman, John R F Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Usman, Adeela Housley, Gemma Lewis, Sarah Glover, Matthew Gage, Heather Logan, Philippa A Martin, Finbarr C Gordon, Adam L How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation |
title | How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
title_full | How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
title_fullStr | How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
title_short | How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
title_sort | how quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in
care homes: a realist evaluation |
topic | Qualitative Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devireena howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT chadbornneilh howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT meyerjulienne howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT banerjeejay howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT goodmanclaire howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT deningtom howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT gladmanjohnrf howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT hinsliffsmithkathryn howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT longannabelle howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT usmanadeela howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT housleygemma howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT lewissarah howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT glovermatthew howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT gageheather howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT loganphilippaa howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT martinfinbarrc howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation AT gordonadaml howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation |