Cargando…

How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devi, Reena, Chadborn, Neil H, Meyer, Julienne, Banerjee, Jay, Goodman, Claire, Dening, Tom, Gladman, John R F, Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn, Long, Annabelle, Usman, Adeela, Housley, Gemma, Lewis, Sarah, Glover, Matthew, Gage, Heather, Logan, Philippa A, Martin, Finbarr C, Gordon, Adam L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007
_version_ 1784585148559261696
author Devi, Reena
Chadborn, Neil H
Meyer, Julienne
Banerjee, Jay
Goodman, Claire
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R F
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Usman, Adeela
Housley, Gemma
Lewis, Sarah
Glover, Matthew
Gage, Heather
Logan, Philippa A
Martin, Finbarr C
Gordon, Adam L
author_facet Devi, Reena
Chadborn, Neil H
Meyer, Julienne
Banerjee, Jay
Goodman, Claire
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R F
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Usman, Adeela
Housley, Gemma
Lewis, Sarah
Glover, Matthew
Gage, Heather
Logan, Philippa A
Martin, Finbarr C
Gordon, Adam L
author_sort Devi, Reena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. RESULTS: QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. CONCLUSIONS: These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85227142021-10-19 How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation Devi, Reena Chadborn, Neil H Meyer, Julienne Banerjee, Jay Goodman, Claire Dening, Tom Gladman, John R F Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Usman, Adeela Housley, Gemma Lewis, Sarah Glover, Matthew Gage, Heather Logan, Philippa A Martin, Finbarr C Gordon, Adam L Age Ageing Qualitative Paper BACKGROUND: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS: A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. RESULTS: QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. CONCLUSIONS: These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI. Oxford University Press 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8522714/ /pubmed/33596305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Qualitative Paper
Devi, Reena
Chadborn, Neil H
Meyer, Julienne
Banerjee, Jay
Goodman, Claire
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R F
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Usman, Adeela
Housley, Gemma
Lewis, Sarah
Glover, Matthew
Gage, Heather
Logan, Philippa A
Martin, Finbarr C
Gordon, Adam L
How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title_full How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title_fullStr How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title_short How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
title_sort how quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
topic Qualitative Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab007
work_keys_str_mv AT devireena howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT chadbornneilh howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT meyerjulienne howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT banerjeejay howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT goodmanclaire howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT deningtom howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT gladmanjohnrf howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT hinsliffsmithkathryn howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT longannabelle howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT usmanadeela howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT housleygemma howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT lewissarah howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT glovermatthew howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT gageheather howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT loganphilippaa howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT martinfinbarrc howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation
AT gordonadaml howqualityimprovementcollaborativesworktoimprovehealthcareincarehomesarealistevaluation