Cargando…

Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Alcohol is the most common cause of liver-related mortality and morbidity. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the prognostic performance of elastography and blood-based markers to predict time to the first liver-related event, severe infection, and all-cause mortality in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft, Thiele, Maja, Johansen, Stine, Kjærgaard, Maria, Lindvig, Katrine Prier, Israelsen, Mads, Antonsen, Steen, Detlefsen, Sönke, Krag, Aleksander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.037
_version_ 1784585159683604480
author Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft
Thiele, Maja
Johansen, Stine
Kjærgaard, Maria
Lindvig, Katrine Prier
Israelsen, Mads
Antonsen, Steen
Detlefsen, Sönke
Krag, Aleksander
author_facet Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft
Thiele, Maja
Johansen, Stine
Kjærgaard, Maria
Lindvig, Katrine Prier
Israelsen, Mads
Antonsen, Steen
Detlefsen, Sönke
Krag, Aleksander
author_sort Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: Alcohol is the most common cause of liver-related mortality and morbidity. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the prognostic performance of elastography and blood-based markers to predict time to the first liver-related event, severe infection, and all-cause mortality in patients with a history of excess drinking. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in patients with early, compensated alcohol-related liver disease. At baseline, we obtained a liver biopsy, transient elastography (TE), 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF), FibroTest, fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS) and Forns index. We compared C-statistics and time-dependent AUC for prognostication. We used validated cut-off points to create 3 risk groups for each test: low, intermediate and high risk. RESULTS: We followed 462 patients for a median of 49 months (IQR 31–70). Median age was 57 years, 76% were males, 20% had advanced fibrosis. Eighty-four patients (18%) developed a liver-related event after a median of 18 months (7-34). TE had the highest prognostic accuracy, with a C-statistic of 0.876, and time-dependent AUC at 5 years of 0.889, comparable to 2D-SWE and ELF. TE, ELF and 2D-SWE outperformed FibroTest, FIB4, NFS, Forns index and biopsy-verified fibrosis stage. Compared to patients with TE <10 kPa, the hazard ratios for liver-related events for TE 10–15 kPa were 8.1 (3.2–20.4), and 27.9 (13.8–56.8) for TE >15 kPa. Periods of excessive drinking during follow-up increased the risk of progressing to liver-related events, except for patients in the low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: TE, ELF and 2D-SWE are highly accurate prognostic markers in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Easy-to-use cut-offs can distinguish between substantially different risk profiles. LAY SUMMARY: Alcohol is the leading cause of death and illness due to liver disease. In this study, we assessed the ability of biomarkers to predict the risk of developing symptomatic liver disease in patients with early stages of alcohol-related liver disease. We found that several tests accurately predicted the risk of liver-related events such as ascites, esophageal varices and hepatic encephalopathy during an average follow-up of 4.1 years. Liver stiffness measurements by ultrasound elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test performed best. By using them, we were able to stratify patients into 3 groups with significantly different risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85228042021-11-01 Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft Thiele, Maja Johansen, Stine Kjærgaard, Maria Lindvig, Katrine Prier Israelsen, Mads Antonsen, Steen Detlefsen, Sönke Krag, Aleksander J Hepatol Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: Alcohol is the most common cause of liver-related mortality and morbidity. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the prognostic performance of elastography and blood-based markers to predict time to the first liver-related event, severe infection, and all-cause mortality in patients with a history of excess drinking. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in patients with early, compensated alcohol-related liver disease. At baseline, we obtained a liver biopsy, transient elastography (TE), 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF), FibroTest, fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS) and Forns index. We compared C-statistics and time-dependent AUC for prognostication. We used validated cut-off points to create 3 risk groups for each test: low, intermediate and high risk. RESULTS: We followed 462 patients for a median of 49 months (IQR 31–70). Median age was 57 years, 76% were males, 20% had advanced fibrosis. Eighty-four patients (18%) developed a liver-related event after a median of 18 months (7-34). TE had the highest prognostic accuracy, with a C-statistic of 0.876, and time-dependent AUC at 5 years of 0.889, comparable to 2D-SWE and ELF. TE, ELF and 2D-SWE outperformed FibroTest, FIB4, NFS, Forns index and biopsy-verified fibrosis stage. Compared to patients with TE <10 kPa, the hazard ratios for liver-related events for TE 10–15 kPa were 8.1 (3.2–20.4), and 27.9 (13.8–56.8) for TE >15 kPa. Periods of excessive drinking during follow-up increased the risk of progressing to liver-related events, except for patients in the low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: TE, ELF and 2D-SWE are highly accurate prognostic markers in patients with alcohol-related liver disease. Easy-to-use cut-offs can distinguish between substantially different risk profiles. LAY SUMMARY: Alcohol is the leading cause of death and illness due to liver disease. In this study, we assessed the ability of biomarkers to predict the risk of developing symptomatic liver disease in patients with early stages of alcohol-related liver disease. We found that several tests accurately predicted the risk of liver-related events such as ascites, esophageal varices and hepatic encephalopathy during an average follow-up of 4.1 years. Liver stiffness measurements by ultrasound elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test performed best. By using them, we were able to stratify patients into 3 groups with significantly different risks. Elsevier 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8522804/ /pubmed/34118335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.037 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Rasmussen, Ditlev Nytoft
Thiele, Maja
Johansen, Stine
Kjærgaard, Maria
Lindvig, Katrine Prier
Israelsen, Mads
Antonsen, Steen
Detlefsen, Sönke
Krag, Aleksander
Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title_full Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title_fullStr Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title_short Prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
title_sort prognostic performance of 7 biomarkers compared to liver biopsy in early alcohol-related liver disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.037
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenditlevnytoft prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT thielemaja prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT johansenstine prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT kjærgaardmaria prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT lindvigkatrineprier prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT israelsenmads prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT antonsensteen prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT detlefsensonke prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT kragaleksander prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease
AT prognosticperformanceof7biomarkerscomparedtoliverbiopsyinearlyalcoholrelatedliverdisease