Cargando…
Trading off accuracy and explainability in AI decision-making: findings from 2 citizens’ juries
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the general public trades off explainability versus accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) systems and whether this differs between healthcare and non-healthcare scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Citizens’ juries are a form of deliberative democracy eliciting informed...
Autores principales: | van der Veer, Sabine N, Riste, Lisa, Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh, Phipps, Denham L, Tully, Mary P, Bozentko, Kyle, Atwood, Sarah, Hubbard, Alex, Wiper, Carl, Oswald, Malcolm, Peek, Niels |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab127 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens’ Juries
por: Tully, Mary P, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
por: Ford, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Commercial use of health data—A public “trial” by citizens' jury
por: Tully, Mary P., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Visual impairment and medication safety: a protocol for a scoping review
por: Giles, Sally J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Co-designing an Adaption of a Mobile App to Enhance Communication, Safety, and Well-being Among People Living at Home With Early-Stage Dementia: Protocol for an Exploratory Multiple Case Study
por: Davies, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)