Cargando…

A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol

BACKGROUND: Emotional disorders in young people are increasing but studies have found that this age group do not always recognise the signs and symptoms of mental health problems in themselves or others. The Mental Health Foundation’s school-based Peer Education Project (PEP) has the potential to im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widnall, Emily, Dodd, Steve, Simmonds, Ruth, Bohan, Helen, Russell, Abigail, Limmer, Mark, Kidger, Judi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11921-3
_version_ 1784585170258493440
author Widnall, Emily
Dodd, Steve
Simmonds, Ruth
Bohan, Helen
Russell, Abigail
Limmer, Mark
Kidger, Judi
author_facet Widnall, Emily
Dodd, Steve
Simmonds, Ruth
Bohan, Helen
Russell, Abigail
Limmer, Mark
Kidger, Judi
author_sort Widnall, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emotional disorders in young people are increasing but studies have found that this age group do not always recognise the signs and symptoms of mental health problems in themselves or others. The Mental Health Foundation’s school-based Peer Education Project (PEP) has the potential to improve young people’s understanding of their own mental health at a critical developmental stage (early adolescence) using a peer teaching method. This study is a process evaluation to understand: the mechanisms through which PEP might improve young people’s mental health literacy, any challenges with delivery, how the project can be embedded within wider school life and how it can be improved to be of most benefit to the widest number of young people. We will also validate a bespoke mental health literacy questionnaire, and test the feasibility of using it to measure outcomes in preparation for a future study evaluating effectiveness. METHODS: All schools recruited to the study will receive the PEP intervention. The process evaluation will be informed by realist evaluation approaches to build understanding regarding key mechanisms of change and the impact of different school contexts. The evaluation will test and revise an existing intervention logic model which has been developed in partnership with the Mental Health Foundation. Process evaluation data will be collected from newly recruited schools (n = 4) as well as current PEP user schools (n = 2) including training and lesson delivery observations, staff interviews and student focus groups. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected in all newly recruited intervention schools (n = 4) from all students in Year 7/8 (who receive the PEP) and recruited peer educators in Year 12 via a self-report survey. DISCUSSION: This study will enable us to refine the logic model underpinning the peer education project and identify areas of the intervention that can be improved. Findings will also inform the design of a future effectiveness study which will test out the extent to which PEP improves mental health literacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8522854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85228542021-10-20 A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol Widnall, Emily Dodd, Steve Simmonds, Ruth Bohan, Helen Russell, Abigail Limmer, Mark Kidger, Judi BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Emotional disorders in young people are increasing but studies have found that this age group do not always recognise the signs and symptoms of mental health problems in themselves or others. The Mental Health Foundation’s school-based Peer Education Project (PEP) has the potential to improve young people’s understanding of their own mental health at a critical developmental stage (early adolescence) using a peer teaching method. This study is a process evaluation to understand: the mechanisms through which PEP might improve young people’s mental health literacy, any challenges with delivery, how the project can be embedded within wider school life and how it can be improved to be of most benefit to the widest number of young people. We will also validate a bespoke mental health literacy questionnaire, and test the feasibility of using it to measure outcomes in preparation for a future study evaluating effectiveness. METHODS: All schools recruited to the study will receive the PEP intervention. The process evaluation will be informed by realist evaluation approaches to build understanding regarding key mechanisms of change and the impact of different school contexts. The evaluation will test and revise an existing intervention logic model which has been developed in partnership with the Mental Health Foundation. Process evaluation data will be collected from newly recruited schools (n = 4) as well as current PEP user schools (n = 2) including training and lesson delivery observations, staff interviews and student focus groups. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected in all newly recruited intervention schools (n = 4) from all students in Year 7/8 (who receive the PEP) and recruited peer educators in Year 12 via a self-report survey. DISCUSSION: This study will enable us to refine the logic model underpinning the peer education project and identify areas of the intervention that can be improved. Findings will also inform the design of a future effectiveness study which will test out the extent to which PEP improves mental health literacy. BioMed Central 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8522854/ /pubmed/34663288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11921-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Widnall, Emily
Dodd, Steve
Simmonds, Ruth
Bohan, Helen
Russell, Abigail
Limmer, Mark
Kidger, Judi
A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title_full A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title_fullStr A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title_short A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
title_sort process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11921-3
work_keys_str_mv AT widnallemily aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT doddsteve aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT simmondsruth aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT bohanhelen aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT russellabigail aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT limmermark aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT kidgerjudi aprocessevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT widnallemily processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT doddsteve processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT simmondsruth processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT bohanhelen processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT russellabigail processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT limmermark processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol
AT kidgerjudi processevaluationofapeereducationprojecttoimprovementalhealthliteracyinsecondaryschoolstudentsstudyprotocol