Cargando…

Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Jie, Tu, Zhenxing, Chen, Hongquan, Liu, Zhiguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34662362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498
_version_ 1784585219912761344
author Ding, Jie
Tu, Zhenxing
Chen, Hongquan
Liu, Zhiguang
author_facet Ding, Jie
Tu, Zhenxing
Chen, Hongquan
Liu, Zhiguang
author_sort Ding, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors (namely smoking behavior, alcohol intake, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, lipidemic traits, glycemic traits, and fasting insulin) and lung cancer. Besides, a bi-directional MR analysis was carried out to disentangle the complex relationship between different risk factors. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized to combine the estimation for each SNP. Cochrane’s Q value was used to evaluate heterogeneity and two methods, including MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO, were adopted to detect horizontal pleiotropy. RESULTS: Three kinds of smoking behavior were all causally associated with lung cancer. Overall, smokers were more likely to suffer from lung cancer compared with non-smokers (OR = 2.58 [1.95, 3.40], p-value = 2.07 x 10(−11)), and quitting smoking could reduce the risk (OR = 4.29[2.60, 7.07], p-value = 1.23 x 10(−8)). Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes and lung cancer (OR = 6.10 [5.35, 6.96], p-value = 4.43x10(-161)). Lower HDL cholesterol could marginally increase the risk of lung cancer, but become insignificant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.82 [0.68, 1.00], p-value = 0.045). In addition, we noted no direct causal relationship between other risk factors and lung cancer. Neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was observed in this study. However, when treating the smoking behavior as the outcome, we found the increased BMI could elevate the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.139[0.104, 0.175], p-value = 1.99x10(-14)) and a similar effect was observed for the waist circumference and hip circumference. Additionally, the elevation of SBP could also marginally increase the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.001 [0.0002, 0.002], p-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Smoking behavior might be the most direct and effective modifiable way to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Meanwhile, smoking behavior can be affected by other risk factors, especially obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85230782021-10-19 Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization Ding, Jie Tu, Zhenxing Chen, Hongquan Liu, Zhiguang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors (namely smoking behavior, alcohol intake, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, lipidemic traits, glycemic traits, and fasting insulin) and lung cancer. Besides, a bi-directional MR analysis was carried out to disentangle the complex relationship between different risk factors. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized to combine the estimation for each SNP. Cochrane’s Q value was used to evaluate heterogeneity and two methods, including MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO, were adopted to detect horizontal pleiotropy. RESULTS: Three kinds of smoking behavior were all causally associated with lung cancer. Overall, smokers were more likely to suffer from lung cancer compared with non-smokers (OR = 2.58 [1.95, 3.40], p-value = 2.07 x 10(−11)), and quitting smoking could reduce the risk (OR = 4.29[2.60, 7.07], p-value = 1.23 x 10(−8)). Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes and lung cancer (OR = 6.10 [5.35, 6.96], p-value = 4.43x10(-161)). Lower HDL cholesterol could marginally increase the risk of lung cancer, but become insignificant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.82 [0.68, 1.00], p-value = 0.045). In addition, we noted no direct causal relationship between other risk factors and lung cancer. Neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was observed in this study. However, when treating the smoking behavior as the outcome, we found the increased BMI could elevate the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.139[0.104, 0.175], p-value = 1.99x10(-14)) and a similar effect was observed for the waist circumference and hip circumference. Additionally, the elevation of SBP could also marginally increase the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.001 [0.0002, 0.002], p-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Smoking behavior might be the most direct and effective modifiable way to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Meanwhile, smoking behavior can be affected by other risk factors, especially obesity. Public Library of Science 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523078/ /pubmed/34662362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498 Text en © 2021 Ding et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Jie
Tu, Zhenxing
Chen, Hongquan
Liu, Zhiguang
Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title_full Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title_fullStr Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title_full_unstemmed Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title_short Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
title_sort identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: indications from mendelian randomization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34662362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498
work_keys_str_mv AT dingjie identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization
AT tuzhenxing identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization
AT chenhongquan identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization
AT liuzhiguang identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization