Cargando…
Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investig...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34662362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498 |
_version_ | 1784585219912761344 |
---|---|
author | Ding, Jie Tu, Zhenxing Chen, Hongquan Liu, Zhiguang |
author_facet | Ding, Jie Tu, Zhenxing Chen, Hongquan Liu, Zhiguang |
author_sort | Ding, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors (namely smoking behavior, alcohol intake, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, lipidemic traits, glycemic traits, and fasting insulin) and lung cancer. Besides, a bi-directional MR analysis was carried out to disentangle the complex relationship between different risk factors. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized to combine the estimation for each SNP. Cochrane’s Q value was used to evaluate heterogeneity and two methods, including MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO, were adopted to detect horizontal pleiotropy. RESULTS: Three kinds of smoking behavior were all causally associated with lung cancer. Overall, smokers were more likely to suffer from lung cancer compared with non-smokers (OR = 2.58 [1.95, 3.40], p-value = 2.07 x 10(−11)), and quitting smoking could reduce the risk (OR = 4.29[2.60, 7.07], p-value = 1.23 x 10(−8)). Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes and lung cancer (OR = 6.10 [5.35, 6.96], p-value = 4.43x10(-161)). Lower HDL cholesterol could marginally increase the risk of lung cancer, but become insignificant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.82 [0.68, 1.00], p-value = 0.045). In addition, we noted no direct causal relationship between other risk factors and lung cancer. Neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was observed in this study. However, when treating the smoking behavior as the outcome, we found the increased BMI could elevate the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.139[0.104, 0.175], p-value = 1.99x10(-14)) and a similar effect was observed for the waist circumference and hip circumference. Additionally, the elevation of SBP could also marginally increase the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.001 [0.0002, 0.002], p-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Smoking behavior might be the most direct and effective modifiable way to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Meanwhile, smoking behavior can be affected by other risk factors, especially obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85230782021-10-19 Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization Ding, Jie Tu, Zhenxing Chen, Hongquan Liu, Zhiguang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored. METHODS: We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors (namely smoking behavior, alcohol intake, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, lipidemic traits, glycemic traits, and fasting insulin) and lung cancer. Besides, a bi-directional MR analysis was carried out to disentangle the complex relationship between different risk factors. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized to combine the estimation for each SNP. Cochrane’s Q value was used to evaluate heterogeneity and two methods, including MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO, were adopted to detect horizontal pleiotropy. RESULTS: Three kinds of smoking behavior were all causally associated with lung cancer. Overall, smokers were more likely to suffer from lung cancer compared with non-smokers (OR = 2.58 [1.95, 3.40], p-value = 2.07 x 10(−11)), and quitting smoking could reduce the risk (OR = 4.29[2.60, 7.07], p-value = 1.23 x 10(−8)). Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes and lung cancer (OR = 6.10 [5.35, 6.96], p-value = 4.43x10(-161)). Lower HDL cholesterol could marginally increase the risk of lung cancer, but become insignificant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.82 [0.68, 1.00], p-value = 0.045). In addition, we noted no direct causal relationship between other risk factors and lung cancer. Neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was observed in this study. However, when treating the smoking behavior as the outcome, we found the increased BMI could elevate the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.139[0.104, 0.175], p-value = 1.99x10(-14)) and a similar effect was observed for the waist circumference and hip circumference. Additionally, the elevation of SBP could also marginally increase the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.001 [0.0002, 0.002], p-value = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Smoking behavior might be the most direct and effective modifiable way to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Meanwhile, smoking behavior can be affected by other risk factors, especially obesity. Public Library of Science 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523078/ /pubmed/34662362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498 Text en © 2021 Ding et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ding, Jie Tu, Zhenxing Chen, Hongquan Liu, Zhiguang Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title | Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title_full | Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title_fullStr | Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title_short | Identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: Indications from Mendelian randomization |
title_sort | identifying modifiable risk factors of lung cancer: indications from mendelian randomization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34662362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dingjie identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization AT tuzhenxing identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization AT chenhongquan identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization AT liuzhiguang identifyingmodifiableriskfactorsoflungcancerindicationsfrommendelianrandomization |