Cargando…

Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair

INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after a superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repair is an important aspect of patient outcomes; however, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been defined. The purpose of this paper is to assess the variability of rehabilitation after a SLAP repair to underst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermanns, Christina A., Coda, Reed G., Cheema, Sana, Vopat, Matthew L., Tarakemeh, Armin, Veazey, Kyle, Schroeppel, John P., Mullen, Scott, Vopat, Bryan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Kansas Medical Center 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671439
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol14.15286
_version_ 1784585226663493632
author Hermanns, Christina A.
Coda, Reed G.
Cheema, Sana
Vopat, Matthew L.
Tarakemeh, Armin
Veazey, Kyle
Schroeppel, John P.
Mullen, Scott
Vopat, Bryan G.
author_facet Hermanns, Christina A.
Coda, Reed G.
Cheema, Sana
Vopat, Matthew L.
Tarakemeh, Armin
Veazey, Kyle
Schroeppel, John P.
Mullen, Scott
Vopat, Bryan G.
author_sort Hermanns, Christina A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after a superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repair is an important aspect of patient outcomes; however, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been defined. The purpose of this paper is to assess the variability of rehabilitation after a SLAP repair to understand the need for standardization to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Protocols for SLAP repairs were collected through a search for Academic Orthopedic Programs and a general Google search using the terms “[Program Name (if applicable)] SLAP Repair Rehab Protocol”. Protocols were compared by sling, range of motion (ROM), physical therapy, return to sport (RTS), return to throwing, and biceps engagement and tenodesis recommendations. Protocols for non-operative or generalized shoulders were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty protocols were included. A total of 61.7% (37/60) recommended a sling for four to six weeks and 90% (54/60) included a full ROM recommendation, but time was variable. There were different exercises recommended, but pendulum swings were recommended by 53% (32/60), submaximal isometrics by 55% (33/60), and scapular strengthening by 65% (39/60). Of the sixty protocols, 33% (20/60) recommended return to sports in 24 weeks and 38.3% (23/60) recommended allowing throwing in 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There was variability in protocols for SLAP repair, especially time until full ROM, RTS, and biceps strengthening. Time in sling and scapular strengthening were the least variable. A lack of specificity within protocols in what return to throwing meant for functional ability made it difficult to compare protocols. Considering the large number of orthopedic programs, a relatively small number had published protocols. Further studies are needed to evaluate a standardized post-operative rehabilitation for SLAP repairs to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Kansas Medical Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85231062021-10-19 Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair Hermanns, Christina A. Coda, Reed G. Cheema, Sana Vopat, Matthew L. Tarakemeh, Armin Veazey, Kyle Schroeppel, John P. Mullen, Scott Vopat, Bryan G. Kans J Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after a superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repair is an important aspect of patient outcomes; however, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been defined. The purpose of this paper is to assess the variability of rehabilitation after a SLAP repair to understand the need for standardization to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Protocols for SLAP repairs were collected through a search for Academic Orthopedic Programs and a general Google search using the terms “[Program Name (if applicable)] SLAP Repair Rehab Protocol”. Protocols were compared by sling, range of motion (ROM), physical therapy, return to sport (RTS), return to throwing, and biceps engagement and tenodesis recommendations. Protocols for non-operative or generalized shoulders were excluded. RESULTS: Sixty protocols were included. A total of 61.7% (37/60) recommended a sling for four to six weeks and 90% (54/60) included a full ROM recommendation, but time was variable. There were different exercises recommended, but pendulum swings were recommended by 53% (32/60), submaximal isometrics by 55% (33/60), and scapular strengthening by 65% (39/60). Of the sixty protocols, 33% (20/60) recommended return to sports in 24 weeks and 38.3% (23/60) recommended allowing throwing in 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There was variability in protocols for SLAP repair, especially time until full ROM, RTS, and biceps strengthening. Time in sling and scapular strengthening were the least variable. A lack of specificity within protocols in what return to throwing meant for functional ability made it difficult to compare protocols. Considering the large number of orthopedic programs, a relatively small number had published protocols. Further studies are needed to evaluate a standardized post-operative rehabilitation for SLAP repairs to improve outcomes. University of Kansas Medical Center 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8523106/ /pubmed/34671439 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol14.15286 Text en © 2021 The University of Kansas Medical Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Hermanns, Christina A.
Coda, Reed G.
Cheema, Sana
Vopat, Matthew L.
Tarakemeh, Armin
Veazey, Kyle
Schroeppel, John P.
Mullen, Scott
Vopat, Bryan G.
Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title_full Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title_fullStr Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title_short Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair
title_sort variability in rehabilitation protocols after superior labrum anterior posterior surgical repair
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671439
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol14.15286
work_keys_str_mv AT hermannschristinaa variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT codareedg variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT cheemasana variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT vopatmatthewl variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT tarakemeharmin variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT veazeykyle variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT schroeppeljohnp variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT mullenscott variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair
AT vopatbryang variabilityinrehabilitationprotocolsaftersuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorsurgicalrepair