Cargando…
Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020
PURPOSE: Early COVID-19 mitigation relied on people staying home except for essential trips. The ability to stay home may differ by sociodemographic factors. We analyzed how factors related to social vulnerability impact a community's ability to stay home during a stay-at-home order. METHODS: U...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34500085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.08.020 |
_version_ | 1784585243673493504 |
---|---|
author | Fletcher, Kelly M. Espey, Julie Grossman, Marissa K. Sharpe, J. Danielle Curriero, Frank C. Wilt, Grete E. Sunshine, Gregory Moreland, Amanda Howard-Williams, Mara Ramos, J. Gabriel Giuffrida, Danilo García, Macarena C. Hartnett, William M. Foster, Stephanie |
author_facet | Fletcher, Kelly M. Espey, Julie Grossman, Marissa K. Sharpe, J. Danielle Curriero, Frank C. Wilt, Grete E. Sunshine, Gregory Moreland, Amanda Howard-Williams, Mara Ramos, J. Gabriel Giuffrida, Danilo García, Macarena C. Hartnett, William M. Foster, Stephanie |
author_sort | Fletcher, Kelly M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Early COVID-19 mitigation relied on people staying home except for essential trips. The ability to stay home may differ by sociodemographic factors. We analyzed how factors related to social vulnerability impact a community's ability to stay home during a stay-at-home order. METHODS: Using generalized, linear mixed models stratified by stay-at-home order (mandatory or not mandatory), we analyzed county-level stay-at-home behavior (inferred from mobile devices) during a period when a majority of United States counties had stay-at-home orders (April 7–April 20, 2020) with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (CDC SVI). RESULTS: Counties with higher percentages of single-parent households, mobile homes, and persons with lower educational attainment were associated with lower stay-at-home behavior compared with counties with lower respective percentages. Counties with higher unemployment, higher percentages of limited-English-language speakers, and more multi-unit housing were associated with increases in stay-at-home behavior compared with counties with lower respective percentages. Stronger effects were found in counties with mandatory orders. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors impact a community's ability to stay home during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. Communities with higher social vulnerability may have more essential workers without work-from-home options or fewer resources to stay home for extended periods, which may increase risk for COVID-19. Results are useful for tailoring messaging, COVID-19 vaccine delivery, and public health responses to future outbreaks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85231742021-10-20 Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 Fletcher, Kelly M. Espey, Julie Grossman, Marissa K. Sharpe, J. Danielle Curriero, Frank C. Wilt, Grete E. Sunshine, Gregory Moreland, Amanda Howard-Williams, Mara Ramos, J. Gabriel Giuffrida, Danilo García, Macarena C. Hartnett, William M. Foster, Stephanie Ann Epidemiol Original Article PURPOSE: Early COVID-19 mitigation relied on people staying home except for essential trips. The ability to stay home may differ by sociodemographic factors. We analyzed how factors related to social vulnerability impact a community's ability to stay home during a stay-at-home order. METHODS: Using generalized, linear mixed models stratified by stay-at-home order (mandatory or not mandatory), we analyzed county-level stay-at-home behavior (inferred from mobile devices) during a period when a majority of United States counties had stay-at-home orders (April 7–April 20, 2020) with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (CDC SVI). RESULTS: Counties with higher percentages of single-parent households, mobile homes, and persons with lower educational attainment were associated with lower stay-at-home behavior compared with counties with lower respective percentages. Counties with higher unemployment, higher percentages of limited-English-language speakers, and more multi-unit housing were associated with increases in stay-at-home behavior compared with counties with lower respective percentages. Stronger effects were found in counties with mandatory orders. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors impact a community's ability to stay home during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. Communities with higher social vulnerability may have more essential workers without work-from-home options or fewer resources to stay home for extended periods, which may increase risk for COVID-19. Results are useful for tailoring messaging, COVID-19 vaccine delivery, and public health responses to future outbreaks. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8523174/ /pubmed/34500085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.08.020 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fletcher, Kelly M. Espey, Julie Grossman, Marissa K. Sharpe, J. Danielle Curriero, Frank C. Wilt, Grete E. Sunshine, Gregory Moreland, Amanda Howard-Williams, Mara Ramos, J. Gabriel Giuffrida, Danilo García, Macarena C. Hartnett, William M. Foster, Stephanie Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title | Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title_full | Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title_fullStr | Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title_short | Social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders, United States, April 7–April 20, 2020 |
title_sort | social vulnerability and county stay-at-home behavior during covid-19 stay-at-home orders, united states, april 7–april 20, 2020 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34500085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.08.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fletcherkellym socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT espeyjulie socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT grossmanmarissak socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT sharpejdanielle socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT currierofrankc socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT wiltgretee socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT sunshinegregory socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT morelandamanda socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT howardwilliamsmara socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT ramosjgabriel socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT giuffridadanilo socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT garciamacarenac socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT hartnettwilliamm socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 AT fosterstephanie socialvulnerabilityandcountystayathomebehaviorduringcovid19stayathomeordersunitedstatesapril7april202020 |