Cargando…

Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review

We performed a systematic review to determine whether the physical examination can reliably assist in the diagnostic approach for patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension (PH). Using dual extraction, two investigators independently searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Emba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shellenberger, Richard A, Imtiaz, Komal, Chellappa, Niranjana, Gundapanneni, Lakshmi, Scheidel, Caleb, Handa, Rishin, Bhat, Aparna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692270
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18020
_version_ 1784585245602873344
author Shellenberger, Richard A
Imtiaz, Komal
Chellappa, Niranjana
Gundapanneni, Lakshmi
Scheidel, Caleb
Handa, Rishin
Bhat, Aparna
author_facet Shellenberger, Richard A
Imtiaz, Komal
Chellappa, Niranjana
Gundapanneni, Lakshmi
Scheidel, Caleb
Handa, Rishin
Bhat, Aparna
author_sort Shellenberger, Richard A
collection PubMed
description We performed a systematic review to determine whether the physical examination can reliably assist in the diagnostic approach for patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension (PH). Using dual extraction, two investigators independently searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies that compared physical examination findings with a right heart catheterization, from inception until July 10, 2021. We obtained data from four studies that evaluated physical examination findings in patients receiving a right heart catheterization to diagnose PH. Pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated for right ventricular heave, a loud pulmonic component of the second heart sound (P2), jugular venous pressure (JVP) 3 cm above sternal angle, and a palpable P2. Three physical examination findings had DOR that supports the diagnosis of PH: the JVP > 3 cm above the sternal angle (5.90, 95% CI 2.57, 13.57), a loud P2 (2.91, 95% CI 1.38, 6.10), and a right ventricular heave (2.78, 95% CI 1.12, 6.89). The palpable P2 had a DOR less than one and was not able to be conclusive in diagnosing PH. Our systematic review found a small body of evidence supporting the use of physical examination tests in the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension. The JVP > 3 cm above the sternal angle was the most accurate physical examination sign for the diagnosis of PH. Larger cohort studies using a combination of tests may shed more light on the role of the physical examination in the diagnosis and early detection of pulmonary hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85231832021-10-22 Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review Shellenberger, Richard A Imtiaz, Komal Chellappa, Niranjana Gundapanneni, Lakshmi Scheidel, Caleb Handa, Rishin Bhat, Aparna Cureus Cardiology We performed a systematic review to determine whether the physical examination can reliably assist in the diagnostic approach for patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension (PH). Using dual extraction, two investigators independently searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies that compared physical examination findings with a right heart catheterization, from inception until July 10, 2021. We obtained data from four studies that evaluated physical examination findings in patients receiving a right heart catheterization to diagnose PH. Pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated for right ventricular heave, a loud pulmonic component of the second heart sound (P2), jugular venous pressure (JVP) 3 cm above sternal angle, and a palpable P2. Three physical examination findings had DOR that supports the diagnosis of PH: the JVP > 3 cm above the sternal angle (5.90, 95% CI 2.57, 13.57), a loud P2 (2.91, 95% CI 1.38, 6.10), and a right ventricular heave (2.78, 95% CI 1.12, 6.89). The palpable P2 had a DOR less than one and was not able to be conclusive in diagnosing PH. Our systematic review found a small body of evidence supporting the use of physical examination tests in the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension. The JVP > 3 cm above the sternal angle was the most accurate physical examination sign for the diagnosis of PH. Larger cohort studies using a combination of tests may shed more light on the role of the physical examination in the diagnosis and early detection of pulmonary hypertension. Cureus 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8523183/ /pubmed/34692270 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18020 Text en Copyright © 2021, Shellenberger et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Shellenberger, Richard A
Imtiaz, Komal
Chellappa, Niranjana
Gundapanneni, Lakshmi
Scheidel, Caleb
Handa, Rishin
Bhat, Aparna
Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_full Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_short Physical Examination for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_sort physical examination for the detection of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692270
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18020
work_keys_str_mv AT shellenbergerricharda physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT imtiazkomal physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT chellappaniranjana physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT gundapannenilakshmi physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT scheidelcaleb physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT handarishin physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview
AT bhataparna physicalexaminationforthedetectionofpulmonaryhypertensionasystematicreview