Cargando…
The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924 |
_version_ | 1784585270148988928 |
---|---|
author | Lazarides, Alexander L. Ferlauto, Harrison R. Burke, Zachary D. C. Griffin, Anthony M. Leckey, Bruce D. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Wunder, Jay S. Ferguson, Peter C. Visgauss, Julia D. Brigman, Brian E. Eward, William C. |
author_facet | Lazarides, Alexander L. Ferlauto, Harrison R. Burke, Zachary D. C. Griffin, Anthony M. Leckey, Bruce D. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Wunder, Jay S. Ferguson, Peter C. Visgauss, Julia D. Brigman, Brian E. Eward, William C. |
author_sort | Lazarides, Alexander L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM surveillance following ALT excision. METHODS: This was a multi-institution, retrospective review of all patients with primary ALTs of the extremities or superficial torso who underwent excision between 2006 and 2018. Minimum follow-up was two years. Long-term survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: 190 patients with ALT were included. Average age was 61.7 years and average follow-up was 58.6 months (24 to 180 months). MDM2 testing was positive in 88 patients (46.3%), and 102 (53.7%) did not receive MDM2 testing. 188 patients (98.9%) had marginal excision, and 127 (66.8%) had marginal or positive margins. Patients received an average of 0.9 CT scans and 1.3 chest radiographs over the surveillance period. 10-year metastasis-free survival was 100%, with no documented deaths from disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that chest imaging does not have a significant role in PM surveillance following ALT excision, but advanced local imaging and chest surveillance may be considered in cases of local recurrence or concern for dedifferentiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85232892021-10-19 The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors Lazarides, Alexander L. Ferlauto, Harrison R. Burke, Zachary D. C. Griffin, Anthony M. Leckey, Bruce D. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Wunder, Jay S. Ferguson, Peter C. Visgauss, Julia D. Brigman, Brian E. Eward, William C. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM surveillance following ALT excision. METHODS: This was a multi-institution, retrospective review of all patients with primary ALTs of the extremities or superficial torso who underwent excision between 2006 and 2018. Minimum follow-up was two years. Long-term survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: 190 patients with ALT were included. Average age was 61.7 years and average follow-up was 58.6 months (24 to 180 months). MDM2 testing was positive in 88 patients (46.3%), and 102 (53.7%) did not receive MDM2 testing. 188 patients (98.9%) had marginal excision, and 127 (66.8%) had marginal or positive margins. Patients received an average of 0.9 CT scans and 1.3 chest radiographs over the surveillance period. 10-year metastasis-free survival was 100%, with no documented deaths from disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that chest imaging does not have a significant role in PM surveillance following ALT excision, but advanced local imaging and chest surveillance may be considered in cases of local recurrence or concern for dedifferentiation. Hindawi 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8523289/ /pubmed/34671190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alexander L. Lazarides et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lazarides, Alexander L. Ferlauto, Harrison R. Burke, Zachary D. C. Griffin, Anthony M. Leckey, Bruce D. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Wunder, Jay S. Ferguson, Peter C. Visgauss, Julia D. Brigman, Brian E. Eward, William C. The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title | The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title_full | The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title_fullStr | The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title_short | The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors |
title_sort | utility of chest imaging for surveillance of atypical lipomatous tumors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lazaridesalexanderl theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT ferlautoharrisonr theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT burkezacharydc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT griffinanthonym theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT leckeybruced theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT bernthalnicholasm theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT wunderjays theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT fergusonpeterc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT visgaussjuliad theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT brigmanbriane theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT ewardwilliamc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT lazaridesalexanderl utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT ferlautoharrisonr utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT burkezacharydc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT griffinanthonym utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT leckeybruced utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT bernthalnicholasm utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT wunderjays utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT fergusonpeterc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT visgaussjuliad utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT brigmanbriane utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors AT ewardwilliamc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors |