Cargando…

The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors

BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazarides, Alexander L., Ferlauto, Harrison R., Burke, Zachary D. C., Griffin, Anthony M., Leckey, Bruce D., Bernthal, Nicholas M., Wunder, Jay S., Ferguson, Peter C., Visgauss, Julia D., Brigman, Brian E., Eward, William C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924
_version_ 1784585270148988928
author Lazarides, Alexander L.
Ferlauto, Harrison R.
Burke, Zachary D. C.
Griffin, Anthony M.
Leckey, Bruce D.
Bernthal, Nicholas M.
Wunder, Jay S.
Ferguson, Peter C.
Visgauss, Julia D.
Brigman, Brian E.
Eward, William C.
author_facet Lazarides, Alexander L.
Ferlauto, Harrison R.
Burke, Zachary D. C.
Griffin, Anthony M.
Leckey, Bruce D.
Bernthal, Nicholas M.
Wunder, Jay S.
Ferguson, Peter C.
Visgauss, Julia D.
Brigman, Brian E.
Eward, William C.
author_sort Lazarides, Alexander L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM surveillance following ALT excision. METHODS: This was a multi-institution, retrospective review of all patients with primary ALTs of the extremities or superficial torso who underwent excision between 2006 and 2018. Minimum follow-up was two years. Long-term survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: 190 patients with ALT were included. Average age was 61.7 years and average follow-up was 58.6 months (24 to 180 months). MDM2 testing was positive in 88 patients (46.3%), and 102 (53.7%) did not receive MDM2 testing. 188 patients (98.9%) had marginal excision, and 127 (66.8%) had marginal or positive margins. Patients received an average of 0.9 CT scans and 1.3 chest radiographs over the surveillance period. 10-year metastasis-free survival was 100%, with no documented deaths from disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that chest imaging does not have a significant role in PM surveillance following ALT excision, but advanced local imaging and chest surveillance may be considered in cases of local recurrence or concern for dedifferentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85232892021-10-19 The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors Lazarides, Alexander L. Ferlauto, Harrison R. Burke, Zachary D. C. Griffin, Anthony M. Leckey, Bruce D. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Wunder, Jay S. Ferguson, Peter C. Visgauss, Julia D. Brigman, Brian E. Eward, William C. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: Unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are thought to have a low propensity for metastasis. Despite this, a standard of care for pulmonary metastasis (PM) surveillance has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of chest imaging for PM surveillance following ALT excision. METHODS: This was a multi-institution, retrospective review of all patients with primary ALTs of the extremities or superficial torso who underwent excision between 2006 and 2018. Minimum follow-up was two years. Long-term survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: 190 patients with ALT were included. Average age was 61.7 years and average follow-up was 58.6 months (24 to 180 months). MDM2 testing was positive in 88 patients (46.3%), and 102 (53.7%) did not receive MDM2 testing. 188 patients (98.9%) had marginal excision, and 127 (66.8%) had marginal or positive margins. Patients received an average of 0.9 CT scans and 1.3 chest radiographs over the surveillance period. 10-year metastasis-free survival was 100%, with no documented deaths from disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that chest imaging does not have a significant role in PM surveillance following ALT excision, but advanced local imaging and chest surveillance may be considered in cases of local recurrence or concern for dedifferentiation. Hindawi 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8523289/ /pubmed/34671190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alexander L. Lazarides et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lazarides, Alexander L.
Ferlauto, Harrison R.
Burke, Zachary D. C.
Griffin, Anthony M.
Leckey, Bruce D.
Bernthal, Nicholas M.
Wunder, Jay S.
Ferguson, Peter C.
Visgauss, Julia D.
Brigman, Brian E.
Eward, William C.
The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title_full The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title_fullStr The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title_short The Utility of Chest Imaging for Surveillance of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors
title_sort utility of chest imaging for surveillance of atypical lipomatous tumors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34671190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4740924
work_keys_str_mv AT lazaridesalexanderl theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT ferlautoharrisonr theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT burkezacharydc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT griffinanthonym theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT leckeybruced theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT bernthalnicholasm theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT wunderjays theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT fergusonpeterc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT visgaussjuliad theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT brigmanbriane theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT ewardwilliamc theutilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT lazaridesalexanderl utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT ferlautoharrisonr utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT burkezacharydc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT griffinanthonym utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT leckeybruced utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT bernthalnicholasm utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT wunderjays utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT fergusonpeterc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT visgaussjuliad utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT brigmanbriane utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors
AT ewardwilliamc utilityofchestimagingforsurveillanceofatypicallipomatoustumors