Cargando…

Global health education in U.K. universities

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a paradigm shift in global health, casting a previously niche academic discipline into a headline dominating field of research. However, accurate information on the delivery of global health education (GHE) at a university level...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Adrienne, Quinn, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd. Publishing service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.06.001
_version_ 1784585272393990144
author Lee, Adrienne
Quinn, Matthew
author_facet Lee, Adrienne
Quinn, Matthew
author_sort Lee, Adrienne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a paradigm shift in global health, casting a previously niche academic discipline into a headline dominating field of research. However, accurate information on the delivery of global health education (GHE) at a university level is lacking. This study aims to assess current GHE practices in U.K. universities, by identifying the availability of dedicated global health qualifications, as well as the breadth of inclusion of GHE topics across university course content. METHODS: Universities selected were the top 25 recipients of MRC funding in 2015–2016, as well as universities who were included in previous iterations of the “Global Health League Table”. We used the Consortium of Universities for Global Health “GHE Competencies Toolkit” to identify the presence of global health content across university global health and other course offerings. Universities were additionally judged on opportunities available in global health and on the presence of sustainable partnerships. RESULTS: Our results showed that 20 universities (74%) offer a post-graduate global health related course, with 9 (33%) offering an undergraduate global health related course. 13 (48%) were identified as centers of global health excellence. Just 12 (44%) universities had registered sustainable partnerships with Tropical Health and Education Trust. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine was identified as the top deliverer of GHE, with the Universities of Leicester and the Universities of Exeter joint bottom. We were unable to standardize quality assessments in this iteration of the project, but the release of student feedback to future assessors would help to improve the reliability of this study methodology. Additionally, much of our data was based on information available online, and thus some aspects of degree courses not published publicly may not have been accounted for in our scoring. CONCLUSION: Those institutions wishing to improve their delivery of GHE should consider the establishment of a postgraduate or undergraduate degree course. Breadth of global health content across curricular was a major discriminating factor between institutions, and we would advise universities to consider including more global health topics across their curricular - especially in light of the intersectional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd. Publishing service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85232992021-10-20 Global health education in U.K. universities Lee, Adrienne Quinn, Matthew Glob Health J Research Article BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a paradigm shift in global health, casting a previously niche academic discipline into a headline dominating field of research. However, accurate information on the delivery of global health education (GHE) at a university level is lacking. This study aims to assess current GHE practices in U.K. universities, by identifying the availability of dedicated global health qualifications, as well as the breadth of inclusion of GHE topics across university course content. METHODS: Universities selected were the top 25 recipients of MRC funding in 2015–2016, as well as universities who were included in previous iterations of the “Global Health League Table”. We used the Consortium of Universities for Global Health “GHE Competencies Toolkit” to identify the presence of global health content across university global health and other course offerings. Universities were additionally judged on opportunities available in global health and on the presence of sustainable partnerships. RESULTS: Our results showed that 20 universities (74%) offer a post-graduate global health related course, with 9 (33%) offering an undergraduate global health related course. 13 (48%) were identified as centers of global health excellence. Just 12 (44%) universities had registered sustainable partnerships with Tropical Health and Education Trust. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine was identified as the top deliverer of GHE, with the Universities of Leicester and the Universities of Exeter joint bottom. We were unable to standardize quality assessments in this iteration of the project, but the release of student feedback to future assessors would help to improve the reliability of this study methodology. Additionally, much of our data was based on information available online, and thus some aspects of degree courses not published publicly may not have been accounted for in our scoring. CONCLUSION: Those institutions wishing to improve their delivery of GHE should consider the establishment of a postgraduate or undergraduate degree course. Breadth of global health content across curricular was a major discriminating factor between institutions, and we would advise universities to consider including more global health topics across their curricular - especially in light of the intersectional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd. Publishing service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. 2021-09 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8523299/ /pubmed/34692173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.06.001 Text en Copyright © 2021 People's Medical Publishing House Co. Ltd. Publishing service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Adrienne
Quinn, Matthew
Global health education in U.K. universities
title Global health education in U.K. universities
title_full Global health education in U.K. universities
title_fullStr Global health education in U.K. universities
title_full_unstemmed Global health education in U.K. universities
title_short Global health education in U.K. universities
title_sort global health education in u.k. universities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.06.001
work_keys_str_mv AT leeadrienne globalhealtheducationinukuniversities
AT quinnmatthew globalhealtheducationinukuniversities