Cargando…

Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction A significant percentage of patients require re-revision surgery regardless of the demonstrated durable short- and mid-term clinical results using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the association between sleeve alignmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouras, Theodoros, Fennema, Peter, Morgan-Jones, Rhidian, Agarwal, Sanjeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692283
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18054
_version_ 1784585282213904384
author Bouras, Theodoros
Fennema, Peter
Morgan-Jones, Rhidian
Agarwal, Sanjeev
author_facet Bouras, Theodoros
Fennema, Peter
Morgan-Jones, Rhidian
Agarwal, Sanjeev
author_sort Bouras, Theodoros
collection PubMed
description Introduction A significant percentage of patients require re-revision surgery regardless of the demonstrated durable short- and mid-term clinical results using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the association between sleeve alignment and contact zones, with loosening in patients with revision TKA. Materials & Methods Of a series of 103 patients who underwent revision TKA, at a mean follow-up of eight years, six patients were re-revised for tibial loosening. These patients were compared with 19 unrevised control subjects in a 1:3 ratio. We calculated and compared the cumulative number of contact zones between the porous-coated part of the sleeve and bone on immediate postoperative X-rays between re-revised and unrevised patients. The main hypothesis was that neutral positioning and absolute circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve would lead to a better outcome. Results The use of a conservative (nonparametric) approach indeed revealed better circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve among the survivors, i.e., survivors: median (interquartile range [IQR]): 3 (2-4); failures: 3 (1-3), p = 0.003 (Mann-Whitney [MW] test). The difference was borderline significant for coronal alignment, i.e., survivors: median (IQR): −1 (−4 to 2); failures: 0 (−1 to 3), p = 0.0569 (MW test). Conclusion A circumferential bony contact of the metaphyseal sleeve would lead to better survival of the revision implant, whereas the degree of varus fixation did not seem to influence the longevity of the implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85233432021-10-22 Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Bouras, Theodoros Fennema, Peter Morgan-Jones, Rhidian Agarwal, Sanjeev Cureus Orthopedics Introduction A significant percentage of patients require re-revision surgery regardless of the demonstrated durable short- and mid-term clinical results using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the association between sleeve alignment and contact zones, with loosening in patients with revision TKA. Materials & Methods Of a series of 103 patients who underwent revision TKA, at a mean follow-up of eight years, six patients were re-revised for tibial loosening. These patients were compared with 19 unrevised control subjects in a 1:3 ratio. We calculated and compared the cumulative number of contact zones between the porous-coated part of the sleeve and bone on immediate postoperative X-rays between re-revised and unrevised patients. The main hypothesis was that neutral positioning and absolute circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve would lead to a better outcome. Results The use of a conservative (nonparametric) approach indeed revealed better circumferential contact between trabecular metaphyseal bone and porous-coated part of the sleeve among the survivors, i.e., survivors: median (interquartile range [IQR]): 3 (2-4); failures: 3 (1-3), p = 0.003 (Mann-Whitney [MW] test). The difference was borderline significant for coronal alignment, i.e., survivors: median (IQR): −1 (−4 to 2); failures: 0 (−1 to 3), p = 0.0569 (MW test). Conclusion A circumferential bony contact of the metaphyseal sleeve would lead to better survival of the revision implant, whereas the degree of varus fixation did not seem to influence the longevity of the implant. Cureus 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8523343/ /pubmed/34692283 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18054 Text en Copyright © 2021, Bouras et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Bouras, Theodoros
Fennema, Peter
Morgan-Jones, Rhidian
Agarwal, Sanjeev
Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort metaphyseal sleeve failure in revision total knee arthroplasty
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692283
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18054
work_keys_str_mv AT bourastheodoros metaphysealsleevefailureinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT fennemapeter metaphysealsleevefailureinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT morganjonesrhidian metaphysealsleevefailureinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT agarwalsanjeev metaphysealsleevefailureinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty