Cargando…

Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction Gallbladder (GB) retrieval is an important cause of postoperative pain (POP) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Retrieval is through the epigastric or umbilical port based on the surgeon’s preference. There is limited evidence to support the superiority of one port over the other...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Arihant, Tajudeen, Muhamed, Sreekanth, Amith, Raj Kumar, Nagarajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692302
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18087
_version_ 1784585290749313024
author Jain, Arihant
Tajudeen, Muhamed
Sreekanth, Amith
Raj Kumar, Nagarajan
author_facet Jain, Arihant
Tajudeen, Muhamed
Sreekanth, Amith
Raj Kumar, Nagarajan
author_sort Jain, Arihant
collection PubMed
description Introduction Gallbladder (GB) retrieval is an important cause of postoperative pain (POP) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Retrieval is through the epigastric or umbilical port based on the surgeon’s preference. There is limited evidence to support the superiority of one port over the other in terms of POP. This study was done to compare POP between epigastric and umbilical ports after GB retrieval in LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis.  Material and methods All patients who underwent elective LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized for GB retrieval either through the umbilical (n = 15) or epigastric (n = 15) port. Postoperatively, the retrieval difficulty score by the operating surgeon, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and surgical site infection (SSI) by postoperative day (POD) 10 and 30 were assessed. Results The mean visual analog scores at the umbilical port at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively were 5.20 ± 0.86, 4.60 ± 0.74, 4.00 ± 0.53, 3.40 ± 0.08, and 2.73 ± 0.82, which were significantly less than the visual analog scores at the epigastric port at the same time intervals, measuring 6.06 ± 1.34, 5.87 ± 1.30, 5.27 ± 1.16, 4.73 ± 1.10, and 3.93 ± 1.03, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between the two arms (p-value < 0.05). The mean retrieval difficulty score was significantly less for the umbilical port (4.40 ± 0.74) when compared with the epigastric port (5.13 ± 0.55). The overall SSI rate in the present study was 10%, and three (20%) patients in the epigastric port group developed SSI by POD 10, while none in the umbilical port group developed SSI. Conclusion GB retrieval from the umbilical port is associated with less POP, SSI, and retrieval difficulty when compared with GB retrieval from the epigastric port after elective LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Titration of analgesic use can also be done appropriately, reducing the dose of analgesics after 12-24 hours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85233912021-10-22 Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Jain, Arihant Tajudeen, Muhamed Sreekanth, Amith Raj Kumar, Nagarajan Cureus Medical Education Introduction Gallbladder (GB) retrieval is an important cause of postoperative pain (POP) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Retrieval is through the epigastric or umbilical port based on the surgeon’s preference. There is limited evidence to support the superiority of one port over the other in terms of POP. This study was done to compare POP between epigastric and umbilical ports after GB retrieval in LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis.  Material and methods All patients who underwent elective LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized for GB retrieval either through the umbilical (n = 15) or epigastric (n = 15) port. Postoperatively, the retrieval difficulty score by the operating surgeon, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and surgical site infection (SSI) by postoperative day (POD) 10 and 30 were assessed. Results The mean visual analog scores at the umbilical port at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively were 5.20 ± 0.86, 4.60 ± 0.74, 4.00 ± 0.53, 3.40 ± 0.08, and 2.73 ± 0.82, which were significantly less than the visual analog scores at the epigastric port at the same time intervals, measuring 6.06 ± 1.34, 5.87 ± 1.30, 5.27 ± 1.16, 4.73 ± 1.10, and 3.93 ± 1.03, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between the two arms (p-value < 0.05). The mean retrieval difficulty score was significantly less for the umbilical port (4.40 ± 0.74) when compared with the epigastric port (5.13 ± 0.55). The overall SSI rate in the present study was 10%, and three (20%) patients in the epigastric port group developed SSI by POD 10, while none in the umbilical port group developed SSI. Conclusion GB retrieval from the umbilical port is associated with less POP, SSI, and retrieval difficulty when compared with GB retrieval from the epigastric port after elective LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Titration of analgesic use can also be done appropriately, reducing the dose of analgesics after 12-24 hours. Cureus 2021-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523391/ /pubmed/34692302 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18087 Text en Copyright © 2021, Jain et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Jain, Arihant
Tajudeen, Muhamed
Sreekanth, Amith
Raj Kumar, Nagarajan
Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of postoperative port-site pain after gallbladder retrieval from epigastric versus umbilical port in patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis: a randomized controlled trial
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692302
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18087
work_keys_str_mv AT jainarihant comparisonofpostoperativeportsitepainaftergallbladderretrievalfromepigastricversusumbilicalportinpatientsoflaparoscopiccholecystectomyforsymptomaticcholelithiasisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tajudeenmuhamed comparisonofpostoperativeportsitepainaftergallbladderretrievalfromepigastricversusumbilicalportinpatientsoflaparoscopiccholecystectomyforsymptomaticcholelithiasisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sreekanthamith comparisonofpostoperativeportsitepainaftergallbladderretrievalfromepigastricversusumbilicalportinpatientsoflaparoscopiccholecystectomyforsymptomaticcholelithiasisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rajkumarnagarajan comparisonofpostoperativeportsitepainaftergallbladderretrievalfromepigastricversusumbilicalportinpatientsoflaparoscopiccholecystectomyforsymptomaticcholelithiasisarandomizedcontrolledtrial