Cargando…

Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is considered a relatively safe and minimally invasive treatment for papillary adenomas. In the literature a significant risk for local recurrence is described. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term recurrence rates and time-to-recurrence. Additiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fritzsche, Jeska A., Klein, Amir, Beekman, Maarten J., van Hooft, Jeanin E., Sidhu, Mayenaaz, Schoeman, Scott, Fockens, Paul, Bourke, Michael J., Voermans, Rogier P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x
_version_ 1784585294124679168
author Fritzsche, Jeska A.
Klein, Amir
Beekman, Maarten J.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Sidhu, Mayenaaz
Schoeman, Scott
Fockens, Paul
Bourke, Michael J.
Voermans, Rogier P.
author_facet Fritzsche, Jeska A.
Klein, Amir
Beekman, Maarten J.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Sidhu, Mayenaaz
Schoeman, Scott
Fockens, Paul
Bourke, Michael J.
Voermans, Rogier P.
author_sort Fritzsche, Jeska A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is considered a relatively safe and minimally invasive treatment for papillary adenomas. In the literature a significant risk for local recurrence is described. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term recurrence rates and time-to-recurrence. Additionally, risk factors for recurrence, malignancy and adverse events were studied. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in consecutive patients with papillary adenomas who underwent EP in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2001 and 2018. Primary outcome was recurrence in patients with at least 1-year endoscopic follow-up. Secondary outcomes were surgery free survival, adverse events, and mortality within 30 days after the index procedure. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were found eligible [median age 66 years, 130 male (50.2%)]. Forty-three patients were known with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (16.6%). At least 1-year endoscopic follow-up was available in 154 patients with a total follow-up of 586 person-years and median of 40 months [interquartile range (IQR) 25–75]. Recurrence occurred in 24 cases (15.6%) of which 8 were known with FAP, leading to a recurrence incidence rate of 4.1 per 100 person-years with a median time-to-recurrence of 29 months (IQR 14.75–59.5). Fifty-three patients underwent at least 5-year follow-up, in 6 (11.3%) of them recurrence was encountered after 5 years of which four were known with FAP. No risk factors for recurrence could be identified. Adverse events occurred in 50/259 patients (19.3%). One patient died within 30 days after the procedure. Papillary stenosis occurred in 19/259 (7.3%) of the patients. There were no cases of malignant degeneration during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence after EP occurs in a significant proportion of patients and occurs even 5 years after EP. This emphasizes the need for long-term follow-up. We advise to consider at least 5-year follow-up in case of a sporadic adenoma, unless comorbidity makes follow-up clinically irrelevant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85234072021-10-22 Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up Fritzsche, Jeska A. Klein, Amir Beekman, Maarten J. van Hooft, Jeanin E. Sidhu, Mayenaaz Schoeman, Scott Fockens, Paul Bourke, Michael J. Voermans, Rogier P. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is considered a relatively safe and minimally invasive treatment for papillary adenomas. In the literature a significant risk for local recurrence is described. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term recurrence rates and time-to-recurrence. Additionally, risk factors for recurrence, malignancy and adverse events were studied. METHODS: This is a retrospective study in consecutive patients with papillary adenomas who underwent EP in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2001 and 2018. Primary outcome was recurrence in patients with at least 1-year endoscopic follow-up. Secondary outcomes were surgery free survival, adverse events, and mortality within 30 days after the index procedure. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were found eligible [median age 66 years, 130 male (50.2%)]. Forty-three patients were known with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (16.6%). At least 1-year endoscopic follow-up was available in 154 patients with a total follow-up of 586 person-years and median of 40 months [interquartile range (IQR) 25–75]. Recurrence occurred in 24 cases (15.6%) of which 8 were known with FAP, leading to a recurrence incidence rate of 4.1 per 100 person-years with a median time-to-recurrence of 29 months (IQR 14.75–59.5). Fifty-three patients underwent at least 5-year follow-up, in 6 (11.3%) of them recurrence was encountered after 5 years of which four were known with FAP. No risk factors for recurrence could be identified. Adverse events occurred in 50/259 patients (19.3%). One patient died within 30 days after the procedure. Papillary stenosis occurred in 19/259 (7.3%) of the patients. There were no cases of malignant degeneration during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence after EP occurs in a significant proportion of patients and occurs even 5 years after EP. This emphasizes the need for long-term follow-up. We advise to consider at least 5-year follow-up in case of a sporadic adenoma, unless comorbidity makes follow-up clinically irrelevant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-11-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8523407/ /pubmed/33159297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Fritzsche, Jeska A.
Klein, Amir
Beekman, Maarten J.
van Hooft, Jeanin E.
Sidhu, Mayenaaz
Schoeman, Scott
Fockens, Paul
Bourke, Michael J.
Voermans, Rogier P.
Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title_full Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title_short Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
title_sort endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzschejeskaa endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT kleinamir endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT beekmanmaartenj endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT vanhooftjeanine endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT sidhumayenaaz endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT schoemanscott endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT fockenspaul endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT bourkemichaelj endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT voermansrogierp endoscopicpapillectomyaretrospectiveinternationalmulticentercohortstudywithlongtermfollowup