Cargando…
Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001)
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomy are generally underrepresented in trials, despite how common the procedure is in clinical practice. The aim of this trial was to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra- and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z |
_version_ | 1784585307399651328 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Dinh Thien-An Klotz, Rosa Harnoss, Julian C. Heger, Patrick Ritter, Alina S. Doerr-Harim, Colette Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal |
author_facet | Tran, Dinh Thien-An Klotz, Rosa Harnoss, Julian C. Heger, Patrick Ritter, Alina S. Doerr-Harim, Colette Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal |
author_sort | Tran, Dinh Thien-An |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomy are generally underrepresented in trials, despite how common the procedure is in clinical practice. The aim of this trial was to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra- and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to primary laparotomy. METHODS: In this single-center controlled clinical trial, adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery via relaparotomy or primary laparotomy were consecutively screened for eligibility. The perioperative course was monitored prospectively in five study visits during hospital stay and one study visit 1 year after surgery. Intraoperative standards, short and long-term outcomes were statistically explored at a level of significance of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients with relaparotomy and 50 patients with primary laparotomy were analyzed. In the relaparotomy group, the access to the abdomen took longer (23.5 min vs. 8.8 min; p = < 0.001) and the peritoneal adhesion index was higher (10.8 vs. 0.4; p = < 0.001). Inadvertent enterotomies were more frequent in the relaparotomy group (relaparotomy 0.3 versus primary laparotomy: 0.0; p = 0.002). The overall comprehensive complication index and rates of surgical site infection and wound dehiscence with evisceration were not different between the two groups. At long-term follow-up, rates of incisional hernia did not differ (relaparotomy: n = 12/104 (11.5%); primary laparotomy: n = 7/35 (20.0%); p = 0.208). DISCUSSION: In this first prospective comparison of relaparotomy with primary laparotomy, inadvertent enterotomies were more frequent in the relaparotomy group. However, contrary to previous retrospective studies, the risk of complications and incisional hernias was not increased compared to primary laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (www.germanctr.de): DRKS00013001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85234692021-10-22 Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) Tran, Dinh Thien-An Klotz, Rosa Harnoss, Julian C. Heger, Patrick Ritter, Alina S. Doerr-Harim, Colette Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomy are generally underrepresented in trials, despite how common the procedure is in clinical practice. The aim of this trial was to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra- and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to primary laparotomy. METHODS: In this single-center controlled clinical trial, adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery via relaparotomy or primary laparotomy were consecutively screened for eligibility. The perioperative course was monitored prospectively in five study visits during hospital stay and one study visit 1 year after surgery. Intraoperative standards, short and long-term outcomes were statistically explored at a level of significance of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients with relaparotomy and 50 patients with primary laparotomy were analyzed. In the relaparotomy group, the access to the abdomen took longer (23.5 min vs. 8.8 min; p = < 0.001) and the peritoneal adhesion index was higher (10.8 vs. 0.4; p = < 0.001). Inadvertent enterotomies were more frequent in the relaparotomy group (relaparotomy 0.3 versus primary laparotomy: 0.0; p = 0.002). The overall comprehensive complication index and rates of surgical site infection and wound dehiscence with evisceration were not different between the two groups. At long-term follow-up, rates of incisional hernia did not differ (relaparotomy: n = 12/104 (11.5%); primary laparotomy: n = 7/35 (20.0%); p = 0.208). DISCUSSION: In this first prospective comparison of relaparotomy with primary laparotomy, inadvertent enterotomies were more frequent in the relaparotomy group. However, contrary to previous retrospective studies, the risk of complications and incisional hernias was not increased compared to primary laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (www.germanctr.de): DRKS00013001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z. Springer US 2021-01-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8523469/ /pubmed/33511544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tran, Dinh Thien-An Klotz, Rosa Harnoss, Julian C. Heger, Patrick Ritter, Alina S. Doerr-Harim, Colette Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title | Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title_full | Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title_fullStr | Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title_short | Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001) |
title_sort | standard of care and outcomes of primary laparotomy versus laparotomy in patients with prior open abdominal surgery (relap study; drks00013001) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04904-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trandinhthienan standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT klotzrosa standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT harnossjulianc standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT hegerpatrick standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT ritteralinas standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT doerrharimcolette standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT knebelphillip standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT schneidermartin standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT buchlermarkusw standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT dienermarkusk standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 AT probstpascal standardofcareandoutcomesofprimarylaparotomyversuslaparotomyinpatientswithprioropenabdominalsurgeryrelapstudydrks00013001 |