Cargando…

Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruckmann, Nils Martin, Kirchner, Julian, Umutlu, Lale, Fendler, Wolfgang Peter, Seifert, Robert, Herrmann, Ken, Bittner, Ann-Kathrin, Hoffmann, Oliver, Mohrmann, Svjetlana, Antke, Christina, Schimmöller, Lars, Ingenwerth, Marc, Breuckmann, Katharina, Stang, Andreas, Buchbender, Christian, Antoch, Gerald, Sawicki, Lino M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07956-0
_version_ 1784585307657601024
author Bruckmann, Nils Martin
Kirchner, Julian
Umutlu, Lale
Fendler, Wolfgang Peter
Seifert, Robert
Herrmann, Ken
Bittner, Ann-Kathrin
Hoffmann, Oliver
Mohrmann, Svjetlana
Antke, Christina
Schimmöller, Lars
Ingenwerth, Marc
Breuckmann, Katharina
Stang, Andreas
Buchbender, Christian
Antoch, Gerald
Sawicki, Lino M.
author_facet Bruckmann, Nils Martin
Kirchner, Julian
Umutlu, Lale
Fendler, Wolfgang Peter
Seifert, Robert
Herrmann, Ken
Bittner, Ann-Kathrin
Hoffmann, Oliver
Mohrmann, Svjetlana
Antke, Christina
Schimmöller, Lars
Ingenwerth, Marc
Breuckmann, Katharina
Stang, Andreas
Buchbender, Christian
Antoch, Gerald
Sawicki, Lino M.
author_sort Bruckmann, Nils Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ(2) test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. RESULTS: Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. KEY POINTS: • [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85234712021-10-22 Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients Bruckmann, Nils Martin Kirchner, Julian Umutlu, Lale Fendler, Wolfgang Peter Seifert, Robert Herrmann, Ken Bittner, Ann-Kathrin Hoffmann, Oliver Mohrmann, Svjetlana Antke, Christina Schimmöller, Lars Ingenwerth, Marc Breuckmann, Katharina Stang, Andreas Buchbender, Christian Antoch, Gerald Sawicki, Lino M. Eur Radiol Oncology OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ(2) test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. RESULTS: Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. KEY POINTS: • [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8523471/ /pubmed/33912991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07956-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Bruckmann, Nils Martin
Kirchner, Julian
Umutlu, Lale
Fendler, Wolfgang Peter
Seifert, Robert
Herrmann, Ken
Bittner, Ann-Kathrin
Hoffmann, Oliver
Mohrmann, Svjetlana
Antke, Christina
Schimmöller, Lars
Ingenwerth, Marc
Breuckmann, Katharina
Stang, Andreas
Buchbender, Christian
Antoch, Gerald
Sawicki, Lino M.
Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title_full Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title_short Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
title_sort prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18f-fdg pet/mri, mri, ct, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07956-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bruckmannnilsmartin prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT kirchnerjulian prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT umutlulale prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT fendlerwolfgangpeter prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT seifertrobert prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT herrmannken prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT bittnerannkathrin prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT hoffmannoliver prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT mohrmannsvjetlana prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT antkechristina prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT schimmollerlars prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT ingenwerthmarc prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT breuckmannkatharina prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT stangandreas prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT buchbenderchristian prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT antochgerald prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients
AT sawickilinom prospectivecomparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyof18ffdgpetmrimrictandbonescintigraphyforthedetectionofbonemetastasesintheinitialstagingofprimarybreastcancerpatients