Cargando…

A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence following cervical esophagogastrostomy may become difficult. Estimation of an individual probability could help to establish preventive and diagnostic measures. The predictive impact of epidemiological, surgery-related data and laboratory paramet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindenmann, Joerg, Fink-Neuboeck, Nicole, Porubsky, Christian, Fediuk, Melanie, Anegg, Udo, Kornprat, Peter, Smolle, Maria, Maier, Alfred, Smolle, Josef, Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08107-0
_version_ 1784585313566326784
author Lindenmann, Joerg
Fink-Neuboeck, Nicole
Porubsky, Christian
Fediuk, Melanie
Anegg, Udo
Kornprat, Peter
Smolle, Maria
Maier, Alfred
Smolle, Josef
Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria
author_facet Lindenmann, Joerg
Fink-Neuboeck, Nicole
Porubsky, Christian
Fediuk, Melanie
Anegg, Udo
Kornprat, Peter
Smolle, Maria
Maier, Alfred
Smolle, Josef
Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria
author_sort Lindenmann, Joerg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence following cervical esophagogastrostomy may become difficult. Estimation of an individual probability could help to establish preventive and diagnostic measures. The predictive impact of epidemiological, surgery-related data and laboratory parameters on the development of anastomotic dehiscence was investigated in the immediate perioperative period. METHODS: Retrospective study in 412 patients with cervical esophagogastrostomy following esophagectomy. Epidemiological data, risk factors, underlying disease, pre-treatment- and surgery-related data, C-reactive protein and albumin levels pre-and post-operatively were evaluated. We applied univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and developed a nomogram for individual risk assessment. RESULTS: There were 345 male, 67 female patients, mean aged 61.5 years; 284 had orthotopic, 128 retrosternal gastric pull-up; 331 patients had carcinoma, 81 non-malignant disease. Mean duration of operation was 184 min; 235 patients had manual, 113 mechanical and 64 semi-mechanical suturing; 76 patients (18.5%) developed anastomotic dehiscence clinically evident at mean 11.4 days after surgery. In univariable testing young age, retrosternal conduit transposition, manual suturing, high body mass index, high ASA and high postoperative levels of C-reactive protein were predictors for anastomotic leakage. These six parameters which had yielded a p < 0.1 in the univariable analysis, were entered into a multivariable analysis and a nomogram allowing the determination of the patient’s individual risk was created. CONCLUSION: By using the nomogram as a supportive measure in the perioperative management, the patient’s individual probability of developing an anastomotic leak could be quantified which may help to take preventive measures improving the outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85234962021-11-04 A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy Lindenmann, Joerg Fink-Neuboeck, Nicole Porubsky, Christian Fediuk, Melanie Anegg, Udo Kornprat, Peter Smolle, Maria Maier, Alfred Smolle, Josef Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of anastomotic dehiscence following cervical esophagogastrostomy may become difficult. Estimation of an individual probability could help to establish preventive and diagnostic measures. The predictive impact of epidemiological, surgery-related data and laboratory parameters on the development of anastomotic dehiscence was investigated in the immediate perioperative period. METHODS: Retrospective study in 412 patients with cervical esophagogastrostomy following esophagectomy. Epidemiological data, risk factors, underlying disease, pre-treatment- and surgery-related data, C-reactive protein and albumin levels pre-and post-operatively were evaluated. We applied univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and developed a nomogram for individual risk assessment. RESULTS: There were 345 male, 67 female patients, mean aged 61.5 years; 284 had orthotopic, 128 retrosternal gastric pull-up; 331 patients had carcinoma, 81 non-malignant disease. Mean duration of operation was 184 min; 235 patients had manual, 113 mechanical and 64 semi-mechanical suturing; 76 patients (18.5%) developed anastomotic dehiscence clinically evident at mean 11.4 days after surgery. In univariable testing young age, retrosternal conduit transposition, manual suturing, high body mass index, high ASA and high postoperative levels of C-reactive protein were predictors for anastomotic leakage. These six parameters which had yielded a p < 0.1 in the univariable analysis, were entered into a multivariable analysis and a nomogram allowing the determination of the patient’s individual risk was created. CONCLUSION: By using the nomogram as a supportive measure in the perioperative management, the patient’s individual probability of developing an anastomotic leak could be quantified which may help to take preventive measures improving the outcome. Springer US 2020-10-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8523496/ /pubmed/33106886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08107-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lindenmann, Joerg
Fink-Neuboeck, Nicole
Porubsky, Christian
Fediuk, Melanie
Anegg, Udo
Kornprat, Peter
Smolle, Maria
Maier, Alfred
Smolle, Josef
Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria
A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title_full A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title_fullStr A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title_short A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
title_sort nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33106886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08107-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lindenmannjoerg anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT finkneuboecknicole anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT porubskychristian anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT fediukmelanie anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT aneggudo anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT kornpratpeter anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollemaria anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT maieralfred anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollejosef anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollejuettnerfreyjamaria anomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT lindenmannjoerg nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT finkneuboecknicole nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT porubskychristian nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT fediukmelanie nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT aneggudo nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT kornpratpeter nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollemaria nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT maieralfred nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollejosef nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy
AT smollejuettnerfreyjamaria nomogramillustratingtheprobabilityofanastomoticleakagefollowingcervicalesophagogastrostomy