Cargando…

Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders

The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent spl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowlands, Charlie, Thomas, Huw B., Lord, Jenny, Wai, Htoo A., Arno, Gavin, Beaman, Glenda, Sergouniotis, Panagiotis, Gomes-Silva, Beatriz, Campbell, Christopher, Gossan, Nicole, Hardcastle, Claire, Webb, Kevin, O’Callaghan, Christopher, Hirst, Robert A., Ramsden, Simon, Jones, Elizabeth, Clayton-Smith, Jill, Webster, Andrew R., Douglas, Andrew G. L., O’Keefe, Raymond T., Newman, William G., Baralle, Diana, Black, Graeme C. M., Ellingford, Jamie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2
_version_ 1784585343923650560
author Rowlands, Charlie
Thomas, Huw B.
Lord, Jenny
Wai, Htoo A.
Arno, Gavin
Beaman, Glenda
Sergouniotis, Panagiotis
Gomes-Silva, Beatriz
Campbell, Christopher
Gossan, Nicole
Hardcastle, Claire
Webb, Kevin
O’Callaghan, Christopher
Hirst, Robert A.
Ramsden, Simon
Jones, Elizabeth
Clayton-Smith, Jill
Webster, Andrew R.
Douglas, Andrew G. L.
O’Keefe, Raymond T.
Newman, William G.
Baralle, Diana
Black, Graeme C. M.
Ellingford, Jamie M.
author_facet Rowlands, Charlie
Thomas, Huw B.
Lord, Jenny
Wai, Htoo A.
Arno, Gavin
Beaman, Glenda
Sergouniotis, Panagiotis
Gomes-Silva, Beatriz
Campbell, Christopher
Gossan, Nicole
Hardcastle, Claire
Webb, Kevin
O’Callaghan, Christopher
Hirst, Robert A.
Ramsden, Simon
Jones, Elizabeth
Clayton-Smith, Jill
Webster, Andrew R.
Douglas, Andrew G. L.
O’Keefe, Raymond T.
Newman, William G.
Baralle, Diana
Black, Graeme C. M.
Ellingford, Jamie M.
author_sort Rowlands, Charlie
collection PubMed
description The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent splicing functional analyses. The capability of algorithms to differentiate VUSs away from the immediate splice site as being ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ is likely to have substantial impact on diagnostic testing. We show that SpliceAI is the best single strategy in this regard, but that combined usage of tools using a weighted approach can increase accuracy further. We incorporated prioritization strategies alongside diagnostic testing for rare disorders. We show that 15% of 2783 referred individuals carry rare variants expected to impact splicing that were not initially identified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’; one in five of these cases could lead to new or refined diagnoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85236912021-10-20 Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders Rowlands, Charlie Thomas, Huw B. Lord, Jenny Wai, Htoo A. Arno, Gavin Beaman, Glenda Sergouniotis, Panagiotis Gomes-Silva, Beatriz Campbell, Christopher Gossan, Nicole Hardcastle, Claire Webb, Kevin O’Callaghan, Christopher Hirst, Robert A. Ramsden, Simon Jones, Elizabeth Clayton-Smith, Jill Webster, Andrew R. Douglas, Andrew G. L. O’Keefe, Raymond T. Newman, William G. Baralle, Diana Black, Graeme C. M. Ellingford, Jamie M. Sci Rep Article The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent splicing functional analyses. The capability of algorithms to differentiate VUSs away from the immediate splice site as being ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ is likely to have substantial impact on diagnostic testing. We show that SpliceAI is the best single strategy in this regard, but that combined usage of tools using a weighted approach can increase accuracy further. We incorporated prioritization strategies alongside diagnostic testing for rare disorders. We show that 15% of 2783 referred individuals carry rare variants expected to impact splicing that were not initially identified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’; one in five of these cases could lead to new or refined diagnoses. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523691/ /pubmed/34663891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rowlands, Charlie
Thomas, Huw B.
Lord, Jenny
Wai, Htoo A.
Arno, Gavin
Beaman, Glenda
Sergouniotis, Panagiotis
Gomes-Silva, Beatriz
Campbell, Christopher
Gossan, Nicole
Hardcastle, Claire
Webb, Kevin
O’Callaghan, Christopher
Hirst, Robert A.
Ramsden, Simon
Jones, Elizabeth
Clayton-Smith, Jill
Webster, Andrew R.
Douglas, Andrew G. L.
O’Keefe, Raymond T.
Newman, William G.
Baralle, Diana
Black, Graeme C. M.
Ellingford, Jamie M.
Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title_full Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title_fullStr Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title_short Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
title_sort comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting rna splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rowlandscharlie comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT thomashuwb comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT lordjenny comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT waihtooa comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT arnogavin comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT beamanglenda comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT sergouniotispanagiotis comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT gomessilvabeatriz comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT campbellchristopher comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT gossannicole comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT hardcastleclaire comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT webbkevin comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT ocallaghanchristopher comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT hirstroberta comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT ramsdensimon comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT joneselizabeth comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT claytonsmithjill comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT websterandrewr comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT douglasandrewgl comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT okeeferaymondt comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT newmanwilliamg comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT barallediana comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT blackgraemecm comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders
AT ellingfordjamiem comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders