Cargando…
Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent spl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2 |
_version_ | 1784585343923650560 |
---|---|
author | Rowlands, Charlie Thomas, Huw B. Lord, Jenny Wai, Htoo A. Arno, Gavin Beaman, Glenda Sergouniotis, Panagiotis Gomes-Silva, Beatriz Campbell, Christopher Gossan, Nicole Hardcastle, Claire Webb, Kevin O’Callaghan, Christopher Hirst, Robert A. Ramsden, Simon Jones, Elizabeth Clayton-Smith, Jill Webster, Andrew R. Douglas, Andrew G. L. O’Keefe, Raymond T. Newman, William G. Baralle, Diana Black, Graeme C. M. Ellingford, Jamie M. |
author_facet | Rowlands, Charlie Thomas, Huw B. Lord, Jenny Wai, Htoo A. Arno, Gavin Beaman, Glenda Sergouniotis, Panagiotis Gomes-Silva, Beatriz Campbell, Christopher Gossan, Nicole Hardcastle, Claire Webb, Kevin O’Callaghan, Christopher Hirst, Robert A. Ramsden, Simon Jones, Elizabeth Clayton-Smith, Jill Webster, Andrew R. Douglas, Andrew G. L. O’Keefe, Raymond T. Newman, William G. Baralle, Diana Black, Graeme C. M. Ellingford, Jamie M. |
author_sort | Rowlands, Charlie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent splicing functional analyses. The capability of algorithms to differentiate VUSs away from the immediate splice site as being ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ is likely to have substantial impact on diagnostic testing. We show that SpliceAI is the best single strategy in this regard, but that combined usage of tools using a weighted approach can increase accuracy further. We incorporated prioritization strategies alongside diagnostic testing for rare disorders. We show that 15% of 2783 referred individuals carry rare variants expected to impact splicing that were not initially identified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’; one in five of these cases could lead to new or refined diagnoses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85236912021-10-20 Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders Rowlands, Charlie Thomas, Huw B. Lord, Jenny Wai, Htoo A. Arno, Gavin Beaman, Glenda Sergouniotis, Panagiotis Gomes-Silva, Beatriz Campbell, Christopher Gossan, Nicole Hardcastle, Claire Webb, Kevin O’Callaghan, Christopher Hirst, Robert A. Ramsden, Simon Jones, Elizabeth Clayton-Smith, Jill Webster, Andrew R. Douglas, Andrew G. L. O’Keefe, Raymond T. Newman, William G. Baralle, Diana Black, Graeme C. M. Ellingford, Jamie M. Sci Rep Article The development of computational methods to assess pathogenicity of pre-messenger RNA splicing variants is critical for diagnosis of human disease. We assessed the capability of eight algorithms, and a consensus approach, to prioritize 249 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) that underwent splicing functional analyses. The capability of algorithms to differentiate VUSs away from the immediate splice site as being ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ is likely to have substantial impact on diagnostic testing. We show that SpliceAI is the best single strategy in this regard, but that combined usage of tools using a weighted approach can increase accuracy further. We incorporated prioritization strategies alongside diagnostic testing for rare disorders. We show that 15% of 2783 referred individuals carry rare variants expected to impact splicing that were not initially identified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’; one in five of these cases could lead to new or refined diagnoses. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523691/ /pubmed/34663891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rowlands, Charlie Thomas, Huw B. Lord, Jenny Wai, Htoo A. Arno, Gavin Beaman, Glenda Sergouniotis, Panagiotis Gomes-Silva, Beatriz Campbell, Christopher Gossan, Nicole Hardcastle, Claire Webb, Kevin O’Callaghan, Christopher Hirst, Robert A. Ramsden, Simon Jones, Elizabeth Clayton-Smith, Jill Webster, Andrew R. Douglas, Andrew G. L. O’Keefe, Raymond T. Newman, William G. Baralle, Diana Black, Graeme C. M. Ellingford, Jamie M. Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title | Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title_full | Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title_fullStr | Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title_short | Comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
title_sort | comparison of in silico strategies to prioritize rare genomic variants impacting rna splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99747-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowlandscharlie comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT thomashuwb comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT lordjenny comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT waihtooa comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT arnogavin comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT beamanglenda comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT sergouniotispanagiotis comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT gomessilvabeatriz comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT campbellchristopher comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT gossannicole comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT hardcastleclaire comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT webbkevin comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT ocallaghanchristopher comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT hirstroberta comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT ramsdensimon comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT joneselizabeth comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT claytonsmithjill comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT websterandrewr comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT douglasandrewgl comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT okeeferaymondt comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT newmanwilliamg comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT barallediana comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT blackgraemecm comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders AT ellingfordjamiem comparisonofinsilicostrategiestoprioritizeraregenomicvariantsimpactingrnasplicingforthediagnosisofgenomicdisorders |