Cargando…

Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study

PURPOSE: The success rate of dental implants after graftless sinus augmentation versus conventional sinus augmentation surgery in atrophic maxillae in edentulous patients was investigated. METHODS: This randomized study was performed in ten edentulous patients with marked maxillary atrophy. On the g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lie, Suen A. N., Leung, Carine A. W., Claessen, Rick M. M. A., Merten, Hans-Albert, Kessler, Peter A. W. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00387-y
_version_ 1784585353698476032
author Lie, Suen A. N.
Leung, Carine A. W.
Claessen, Rick M. M. A.
Merten, Hans-Albert
Kessler, Peter A. W. H.
author_facet Lie, Suen A. N.
Leung, Carine A. W.
Claessen, Rick M. M. A.
Merten, Hans-Albert
Kessler, Peter A. W. H.
author_sort Lie, Suen A. N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The success rate of dental implants after graftless sinus augmentation versus conventional sinus augmentation surgery in atrophic maxillae in edentulous patients was investigated. METHODS: This randomized study was performed in ten edentulous patients with marked maxillary atrophy. On the graftless side, the sinus membrane was lifted by a resorbable membrane. The control side was augmented with a mixture of autografts and xenografts. Implant placement followed 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes were implant survival, success of prosthetic rehabilitation and stability of vertical bone gain. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Postoperative radiology showed sufficient bone gain on both maxillary sides. Follow-up varied from 57 to 88 months. The conventional side showed significant (p = 0.041) more bone gain than the experimental side (respectively, 9.69 mm and 6.20 mm). A total of 59 implants were placed: 30 after conventional, 29 after graftless augmentation. One implant was lost on the conventional side and four on the experimental side. The implant survival was significantly higher on the conventional side (96.7% vs. 86.2%, p < 0.001, RR = 4.14). Prosthetic restoration was functionally successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Bone gain and implant survival were significantly lower in the non-grafted side versus the grafted side. Prosthetic rehabilitation was possible in all ten patients. The non-grafted technique may have some potential for clinical use, although it showed poorer results. Trial registration The Netherlands Trialregister. NTR NL3541 (NTR3696). Registered 20 January 2013, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3541.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85237342021-11-04 Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study Lie, Suen A. N. Leung, Carine A. W. Claessen, Rick M. M. A. Merten, Hans-Albert Kessler, Peter A. W. H. Int J Implant Dent Research PURPOSE: The success rate of dental implants after graftless sinus augmentation versus conventional sinus augmentation surgery in atrophic maxillae in edentulous patients was investigated. METHODS: This randomized study was performed in ten edentulous patients with marked maxillary atrophy. On the graftless side, the sinus membrane was lifted by a resorbable membrane. The control side was augmented with a mixture of autografts and xenografts. Implant placement followed 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes were implant survival, success of prosthetic rehabilitation and stability of vertical bone gain. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Postoperative radiology showed sufficient bone gain on both maxillary sides. Follow-up varied from 57 to 88 months. The conventional side showed significant (p = 0.041) more bone gain than the experimental side (respectively, 9.69 mm and 6.20 mm). A total of 59 implants were placed: 30 after conventional, 29 after graftless augmentation. One implant was lost on the conventional side and four on the experimental side. The implant survival was significantly higher on the conventional side (96.7% vs. 86.2%, p < 0.001, RR = 4.14). Prosthetic restoration was functionally successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Bone gain and implant survival were significantly lower in the non-grafted side versus the grafted side. Prosthetic rehabilitation was possible in all ten patients. The non-grafted technique may have some potential for clinical use, although it showed poorer results. Trial registration The Netherlands Trialregister. NTR NL3541 (NTR3696). Registered 20 January 2013, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3541. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8523734/ /pubmed/34661774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00387-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lie, Suen A. N.
Leung, Carine A. W.
Claessen, Rick M. M. A.
Merten, Hans-Albert
Kessler, Peter A. W. H.
Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title_full Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title_fullStr Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title_full_unstemmed Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title_short Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
title_sort implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00387-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liesuenan implantsurvivalaftergraftlesssinusflooraugmentationinhighlyatrophicmaxillaearandomizedcontrolledtrialinasplitmouthstudy
AT leungcarineaw implantsurvivalaftergraftlesssinusflooraugmentationinhighlyatrophicmaxillaearandomizedcontrolledtrialinasplitmouthstudy
AT claessenrickmma implantsurvivalaftergraftlesssinusflooraugmentationinhighlyatrophicmaxillaearandomizedcontrolledtrialinasplitmouthstudy
AT mertenhansalbert implantsurvivalaftergraftlesssinusflooraugmentationinhighlyatrophicmaxillaearandomizedcontrolledtrialinasplitmouthstudy
AT kesslerpeterawh implantsurvivalaftergraftlesssinusflooraugmentationinhighlyatrophicmaxillaearandomizedcontrolledtrialinasplitmouthstudy