Cargando…

Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors, surgical treatment methods and clinical effect of internal fixation failure of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. METHODS: From June 2015 to May 2019, arthroplasty and internal fixation revision were used to treat 18 cases of internal fixation fai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Gang, Teng, Lin, Li, Hai‐bo, Huang, Fu‐guo, Xiang, Zhou, Cen, Shi‐qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13110
_version_ 1784585361698062336
author Zhong, Gang
Teng, Lin
Li, Hai‐bo
Huang, Fu‐guo
Xiang, Zhou
Cen, Shi‐qiang
author_facet Zhong, Gang
Teng, Lin
Li, Hai‐bo
Huang, Fu‐guo
Xiang, Zhou
Cen, Shi‐qiang
author_sort Zhong, Gang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors, surgical treatment methods and clinical effect of internal fixation failure of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. METHODS: From June 2015 to May 2019, arthroplasty and internal fixation revision were used to treat 18 cases of internal fixation failure of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. There were 10 males and eight females, with an average age of 67.3 years (38–92 years). The 16 cases of initial intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to AO/OTA:13 cases of A2 and 3 cases of A3, the other 2 cases were subtrochanteric fractures (Seinsheimer type IV). The internal fixation failure was treated with total hip arthroplasty (6 cases), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 cases), revision with proximal femoral lockingplate (4 cases) and extend intramedullary nail (4 cases). RESULTS: All patients were followed up for an average of 24.7 months (range, 12 to 36 months). The average operative time was 111.4 min (range, 72 to 146 min) and the average intraoperative blood loss was 403.6 mL (range, 200 to 650 mL). The average time of fracture union was 6.9 months (range, 5 to 9 months) for cases of internal fixation revision. The operative time of the arthroplasty group was shorter than the revision group (P < 0.001), and the intraoperative blood loss of the arthroplasty group was less than the revision group (P = 0.001). The affected limb shortening of postoperative (0.21 ± 0.19 cm) was better than preoperative (2.01 ± 0.60 cm) (P < 0.001), while the limb shortening of the arthroplasty group (0.11 ± 0.21 cm) was less than the revision group (0.33 ± 0.09 cm) (P = 0.015). At the last follow‐up, all injured limbs regained walking function, and the Harris hip score was 81.3 ± 9.4 points. The Harris score of postoperative was better than preoperative (33.4 ± 5.9 points) (P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences between the arthroplasty group and the revision group at 3 months (76.5 ± 8.5 vs 71.1 ± 10.6, P = 0.249), 6 months (80.9 ± 7.9 vs 78.9 ± 12.9,P = 0.687) postoperative and the last follow‐up (80.5 ± 8.3 vs 82.3 ± 11.7, P = 0.716) respectively. CONCLUSION: For internal fixation failure of peritrochanteric fractures, young patients could accept internal fixation revision to restore normal anatomical structure, correct varus deformity and autograft; while elderly patients and patients with damaged femoral head could be treated with arthroplasty to restore walking function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85237692021-10-25 Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture Zhong, Gang Teng, Lin Li, Hai‐bo Huang, Fu‐guo Xiang, Zhou Cen, Shi‐qiang Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors, surgical treatment methods and clinical effect of internal fixation failure of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. METHODS: From June 2015 to May 2019, arthroplasty and internal fixation revision were used to treat 18 cases of internal fixation failure of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. There were 10 males and eight females, with an average age of 67.3 years (38–92 years). The 16 cases of initial intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to AO/OTA:13 cases of A2 and 3 cases of A3, the other 2 cases were subtrochanteric fractures (Seinsheimer type IV). The internal fixation failure was treated with total hip arthroplasty (6 cases), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 cases), revision with proximal femoral lockingplate (4 cases) and extend intramedullary nail (4 cases). RESULTS: All patients were followed up for an average of 24.7 months (range, 12 to 36 months). The average operative time was 111.4 min (range, 72 to 146 min) and the average intraoperative blood loss was 403.6 mL (range, 200 to 650 mL). The average time of fracture union was 6.9 months (range, 5 to 9 months) for cases of internal fixation revision. The operative time of the arthroplasty group was shorter than the revision group (P < 0.001), and the intraoperative blood loss of the arthroplasty group was less than the revision group (P = 0.001). The affected limb shortening of postoperative (0.21 ± 0.19 cm) was better than preoperative (2.01 ± 0.60 cm) (P < 0.001), while the limb shortening of the arthroplasty group (0.11 ± 0.21 cm) was less than the revision group (0.33 ± 0.09 cm) (P = 0.015). At the last follow‐up, all injured limbs regained walking function, and the Harris hip score was 81.3 ± 9.4 points. The Harris score of postoperative was better than preoperative (33.4 ± 5.9 points) (P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences between the arthroplasty group and the revision group at 3 months (76.5 ± 8.5 vs 71.1 ± 10.6, P = 0.249), 6 months (80.9 ± 7.9 vs 78.9 ± 12.9,P = 0.687) postoperative and the last follow‐up (80.5 ± 8.3 vs 82.3 ± 11.7, P = 0.716) respectively. CONCLUSION: For internal fixation failure of peritrochanteric fractures, young patients could accept internal fixation revision to restore normal anatomical structure, correct varus deformity and autograft; while elderly patients and patients with damaged femoral head could be treated with arthroplasty to restore walking function. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8523769/ /pubmed/34142451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13110 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Zhong, Gang
Teng, Lin
Li, Hai‐bo
Huang, Fu‐guo
Xiang, Zhou
Cen, Shi‐qiang
Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title_full Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title_fullStr Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title_short Surgical Treatment of Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Peritrochanteric Fracture
title_sort surgical treatment of internal fixation failure of femoral peritrochanteric fracture
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13110
work_keys_str_mv AT zhonggang surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture
AT tenglin surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture
AT lihaibo surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture
AT huangfuguo surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture
AT xiangzhou surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture
AT censhiqiang surgicaltreatmentofinternalfixationfailureoffemoralperitrochantericfracture