Cargando…

Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods

The fruit of Lycium ruthenicum (LRF), known as black wolfberry, is a medicinal and edible fruit. The fresh LRF is perishable and has only about 3 days of shelf life. Drying could prolong the shelf life of LRF. However, it could imply physical changes and chemical modification. This study evaluated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Youyuan, Kong, Xiangfeng, Zhang, Juanhong, Guo, Chao, Qu, Zhuo, Jin, Ling, Wang, Hanqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.737521
_version_ 1784585377845084160
author Lu, Youyuan
Kong, Xiangfeng
Zhang, Juanhong
Guo, Chao
Qu, Zhuo
Jin, Ling
Wang, Hanqing
author_facet Lu, Youyuan
Kong, Xiangfeng
Zhang, Juanhong
Guo, Chao
Qu, Zhuo
Jin, Ling
Wang, Hanqing
author_sort Lu, Youyuan
collection PubMed
description The fruit of Lycium ruthenicum (LRF), known as black wolfberry, is a medicinal and edible fruit. The fresh LRF is perishable and has only about 3 days of shelf life. Drying could prolong the shelf life of LRF. However, it could imply physical changes and chemical modification. This study evaluated the effect of sun drying (SD), hot air drying (HD), and freeze drying (FD) on the appearance characteristics, moisture content, bioactive compounds, amino acid composition, and antioxidant activity of LRF. The results showed that LRF dried by FD was round, expansive, fragile, and maintained the largest amount of appearance traits among the three drying methods. Drying methods had a significant effect on phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of LRF (P < 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that procyanidin content (PAC), asparagine (Asn), total phenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and moisture content were the main sources of the difference in LRF dried by different methods. The characteristic of LRF in FD was low moisture content, and high TPC, Asn, PAC, and TAC. Sun drying was opposite to FD. Hot air drying was high TPC and low TAC content. The quality of LRF was in the order of FD > HD > SD based on comprehensive evaluation of the phytochemical component content and antioxidant capacity. Additionally, the water temperature and soaking time had different antioxidant activity effect on LRF dried by different methods. These findings will provide useful information for production and utilization of LRF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85238352021-10-20 Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods Lu, Youyuan Kong, Xiangfeng Zhang, Juanhong Guo, Chao Qu, Zhuo Jin, Ling Wang, Hanqing Front Nutr Nutrition The fruit of Lycium ruthenicum (LRF), known as black wolfberry, is a medicinal and edible fruit. The fresh LRF is perishable and has only about 3 days of shelf life. Drying could prolong the shelf life of LRF. However, it could imply physical changes and chemical modification. This study evaluated the effect of sun drying (SD), hot air drying (HD), and freeze drying (FD) on the appearance characteristics, moisture content, bioactive compounds, amino acid composition, and antioxidant activity of LRF. The results showed that LRF dried by FD was round, expansive, fragile, and maintained the largest amount of appearance traits among the three drying methods. Drying methods had a significant effect on phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of LRF (P < 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that procyanidin content (PAC), asparagine (Asn), total phenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and moisture content were the main sources of the difference in LRF dried by different methods. The characteristic of LRF in FD was low moisture content, and high TPC, Asn, PAC, and TAC. Sun drying was opposite to FD. Hot air drying was high TPC and low TAC content. The quality of LRF was in the order of FD > HD > SD based on comprehensive evaluation of the phytochemical component content and antioxidant capacity. Additionally, the water temperature and soaking time had different antioxidant activity effect on LRF dried by different methods. These findings will provide useful information for production and utilization of LRF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8523835/ /pubmed/34676235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.737521 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lu, Kong, Zhang, Guo, Qu, Jin and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Lu, Youyuan
Kong, Xiangfeng
Zhang, Juanhong
Guo, Chao
Qu, Zhuo
Jin, Ling
Wang, Hanqing
Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title_full Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title_fullStr Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title_short Composition Changes in Lycium ruthenicum Fruit Dried by Different Methods
title_sort composition changes in lycium ruthenicum fruit dried by different methods
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.737521
work_keys_str_mv AT luyouyuan compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT kongxiangfeng compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT zhangjuanhong compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT guochao compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT quzhuo compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT jinling compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods
AT wanghanqing compositionchangesinlyciumruthenicumfruitdriedbydifferentmethods