Cargando…
The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703287 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121 |
_version_ | 1784585393858936832 |
---|---|
author | Alyousefi, Nada Alibrahim, Aljouhara Taleb, Haifaa Alotaibi, Lama Alrahmah, Leena Aldubaib, Noorah Aljebreen, Shahad Alrowais, Norah Aljarallah, Jamal |
author_facet | Alyousefi, Nada Alibrahim, Aljouhara Taleb, Haifaa Alotaibi, Lama Alrahmah, Leena Aldubaib, Noorah Aljebreen, Shahad Alrowais, Norah Aljarallah, Jamal |
author_sort | Alyousefi, Nada |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. This study aims to estimate moral sensitivity among physicians and determine the factors that influence it. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among physicians working at a tertiary hospital. The Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) developed by Kim Lützén was used. The lowest score that can be obtained from the MSQ is 30, and the highest score is 210. Low scores demonstrate high ethical sensitivity, and high scores indicate low ethical sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 253 physicians participated in the study. The mean score of moral sensitivity was 90.6±19.6. There is a significant difference in the overall moral sensitivity in relation to age (P = 0.049). There are significant differences in the Moral conflict dimension according to age (P = 0.002), parental status (P = 0.011), being a member of an ethical committee (P = 0.025), years of experience (P = 0.002), clinical ranking (P < 0.001), and previous training in bioethics (P = 0.029). There were significant differences in the Relational orientation dimension with the clinical ranking (P = 0.038) and specialty (P = 0.038). Membership of an ethical committee is a significant variable in the Benefit dimension (P = 0.028). Correlation coefficients between the overall moral sensitivity score and its dimensions were Autonomy (r = 0.68), Practice (r = 0.69), and Holistic approach (r = 0.69). Physicians who previously had training in bioethics (β 2.37, P = 0.022) and physicians who worked with clinical ethics committee (β 2.66, P = 0.008) were more likely to score better in Moral conflict dimension. CONCLUSION: Implementing ethical training for medical students and physicians will help raise their moral sensitivity levels, thereby enhancing how they deal with ethical dilemmas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8523900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85239002021-10-25 The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians Alyousefi, Nada Alibrahim, Aljouhara Taleb, Haifaa Alotaibi, Lama Alrahmah, Leena Aldubaib, Noorah Aljebreen, Shahad Alrowais, Norah Aljarallah, Jamal Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. This study aims to estimate moral sensitivity among physicians and determine the factors that influence it. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among physicians working at a tertiary hospital. The Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) developed by Kim Lützén was used. The lowest score that can be obtained from the MSQ is 30, and the highest score is 210. Low scores demonstrate high ethical sensitivity, and high scores indicate low ethical sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 253 physicians participated in the study. The mean score of moral sensitivity was 90.6±19.6. There is a significant difference in the overall moral sensitivity in relation to age (P = 0.049). There are significant differences in the Moral conflict dimension according to age (P = 0.002), parental status (P = 0.011), being a member of an ethical committee (P = 0.025), years of experience (P = 0.002), clinical ranking (P < 0.001), and previous training in bioethics (P = 0.029). There were significant differences in the Relational orientation dimension with the clinical ranking (P = 0.038) and specialty (P = 0.038). Membership of an ethical committee is a significant variable in the Benefit dimension (P = 0.028). Correlation coefficients between the overall moral sensitivity score and its dimensions were Autonomy (r = 0.68), Practice (r = 0.69), and Holistic approach (r = 0.69). Physicians who previously had training in bioethics (β 2.37, P = 0.022) and physicians who worked with clinical ethics committee (β 2.66, P = 0.008) were more likely to score better in Moral conflict dimension. CONCLUSION: Implementing ethical training for medical students and physicians will help raise their moral sensitivity levels, thereby enhancing how they deal with ethical dilemmas. Dove 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8523900/ /pubmed/34703287 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121 Text en © 2021 Alyousefi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alyousefi, Nada Alibrahim, Aljouhara Taleb, Haifaa Alotaibi, Lama Alrahmah, Leena Aldubaib, Noorah Aljebreen, Shahad Alrowais, Norah Aljarallah, Jamal The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title | The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title_full | The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title_fullStr | The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title_short | The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians |
title_sort | predictors of moral sensitivity among physicians |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703287 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alyousefinada thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alibrahimaljouhara thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT talebhaifaa thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alotaibilama thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alrahmahleena thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aldubaibnoorah thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aljebreenshahad thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alrowaisnorah thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aljarallahjamal thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alyousefinada predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alibrahimaljouhara predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT talebhaifaa predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alotaibilama predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alrahmahleena predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aldubaibnoorah predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aljebreenshahad predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT alrowaisnorah predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians AT aljarallahjamal predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians |