Cargando…

The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians

PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alyousefi, Nada, Alibrahim, Aljouhara, Taleb, Haifaa, Alotaibi, Lama, Alrahmah, Leena, Aldubaib, Noorah, Aljebreen, Shahad, Alrowais, Norah, Aljarallah, Jamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703287
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121
_version_ 1784585393858936832
author Alyousefi, Nada
Alibrahim, Aljouhara
Taleb, Haifaa
Alotaibi, Lama
Alrahmah, Leena
Aldubaib, Noorah
Aljebreen, Shahad
Alrowais, Norah
Aljarallah, Jamal
author_facet Alyousefi, Nada
Alibrahim, Aljouhara
Taleb, Haifaa
Alotaibi, Lama
Alrahmah, Leena
Aldubaib, Noorah
Aljebreen, Shahad
Alrowais, Norah
Aljarallah, Jamal
author_sort Alyousefi, Nada
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. This study aims to estimate moral sensitivity among physicians and determine the factors that influence it. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among physicians working at a tertiary hospital. The Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) developed by Kim Lützén was used. The lowest score that can be obtained from the MSQ is 30, and the highest score is 210. Low scores demonstrate high ethical sensitivity, and high scores indicate low ethical sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 253 physicians participated in the study. The mean score of moral sensitivity was 90.6±19.6. There is a significant difference in the overall moral sensitivity in relation to age (P = 0.049). There are significant differences in the Moral conflict dimension according to age (P = 0.002), parental status (P = 0.011), being a member of an ethical committee (P = 0.025), years of experience (P = 0.002), clinical ranking (P < 0.001), and previous training in bioethics (P = 0.029). There were significant differences in the Relational orientation dimension with the clinical ranking (P = 0.038) and specialty (P = 0.038). Membership of an ethical committee is a significant variable in the Benefit dimension (P = 0.028). Correlation coefficients between the overall moral sensitivity score and its dimensions were Autonomy (r = 0.68), Practice (r = 0.69), and Holistic approach (r = 0.69). Physicians who previously had training in bioethics (β 2.37, P = 0.022) and physicians who worked with clinical ethics committee (β 2.66, P = 0.008) were more likely to score better in Moral conflict dimension. CONCLUSION: Implementing ethical training for medical students and physicians will help raise their moral sensitivity levels, thereby enhancing how they deal with ethical dilemmas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8523900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85239002021-10-25 The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians Alyousefi, Nada Alibrahim, Aljouhara Taleb, Haifaa Alotaibi, Lama Alrahmah, Leena Aldubaib, Noorah Aljebreen, Shahad Alrowais, Norah Aljarallah, Jamal Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: The continually advancing nature of health care has improved the quality of care provided to patients. However, it has also resulted in complex ethical issues healthcare providers face in Saudi Arabia. Literature concerning healthcare workers’ moral sensitivity in Saudi Arabia is limited. This study aims to estimate moral sensitivity among physicians and determine the factors that influence it. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among physicians working at a tertiary hospital. The Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) developed by Kim Lützén was used. The lowest score that can be obtained from the MSQ is 30, and the highest score is 210. Low scores demonstrate high ethical sensitivity, and high scores indicate low ethical sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 253 physicians participated in the study. The mean score of moral sensitivity was 90.6±19.6. There is a significant difference in the overall moral sensitivity in relation to age (P = 0.049). There are significant differences in the Moral conflict dimension according to age (P = 0.002), parental status (P = 0.011), being a member of an ethical committee (P = 0.025), years of experience (P = 0.002), clinical ranking (P < 0.001), and previous training in bioethics (P = 0.029). There were significant differences in the Relational orientation dimension with the clinical ranking (P = 0.038) and specialty (P = 0.038). Membership of an ethical committee is a significant variable in the Benefit dimension (P = 0.028). Correlation coefficients between the overall moral sensitivity score and its dimensions were Autonomy (r = 0.68), Practice (r = 0.69), and Holistic approach (r = 0.69). Physicians who previously had training in bioethics (β 2.37, P = 0.022) and physicians who worked with clinical ethics committee (β 2.66, P = 0.008) were more likely to score better in Moral conflict dimension. CONCLUSION: Implementing ethical training for medical students and physicians will help raise their moral sensitivity levels, thereby enhancing how they deal with ethical dilemmas. Dove 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8523900/ /pubmed/34703287 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121 Text en © 2021 Alyousefi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alyousefi, Nada
Alibrahim, Aljouhara
Taleb, Haifaa
Alotaibi, Lama
Alrahmah, Leena
Aldubaib, Noorah
Aljebreen, Shahad
Alrowais, Norah
Aljarallah, Jamal
The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title_full The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title_fullStr The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title_full_unstemmed The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title_short The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians
title_sort predictors of moral sensitivity among physicians
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8523900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703287
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336121
work_keys_str_mv AT alyousefinada thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alibrahimaljouhara thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT talebhaifaa thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alotaibilama thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alrahmahleena thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aldubaibnoorah thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aljebreenshahad thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alrowaisnorah thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aljarallahjamal thepredictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alyousefinada predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alibrahimaljouhara predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT talebhaifaa predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alotaibilama predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alrahmahleena predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aldubaibnoorah predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aljebreenshahad predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT alrowaisnorah predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians
AT aljarallahjamal predictorsofmoralsensitivityamongphysicians