Cargando…

An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study

BACKGROUND: Handheld oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices have been a mainstay of treatment for patients with hypersecretory conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) since the 1970s. Current devices are reusable and require regular c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Sullivan, Kevin J., Power, Valerie, Linnane, Barry, McGrath, Deirdre, Fogarty, Hilda, Ryan, Martina, White, Rebecca, Noonan, Conor, Mulloy, Eithne, O’Sullivan, Leonard W., Dunne, Colum P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01689-y
_version_ 1784585469183393792
author O’Sullivan, Kevin J.
Power, Valerie
Linnane, Barry
McGrath, Deirdre
Fogarty, Hilda
Ryan, Martina
White, Rebecca
Noonan, Conor
Mulloy, Eithne
O’Sullivan, Leonard W.
Dunne, Colum P.
author_facet O’Sullivan, Kevin J.
Power, Valerie
Linnane, Barry
McGrath, Deirdre
Fogarty, Hilda
Ryan, Martina
White, Rebecca
Noonan, Conor
Mulloy, Eithne
O’Sullivan, Leonard W.
Dunne, Colum P.
author_sort O’Sullivan, Kevin J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Handheld oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices have been a mainstay of treatment for patients with hypersecretory conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) since the 1970s. Current devices are reusable and require regular cleaning and disinfection to prevent harbouring potentially pathogenic organisms. Adherence to cleaning regimens for respiratory devices is often poor and in response to this, a prototype disposable OPEP device—the ‘UL-OPEP’ (University of Limerick—Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure device)—was developed to mitigate the risk of contamination by pathogens. The device was previously evaluated successfully in a group of paediatric CF patients. The aim of the current study was to initially evaluate the safety of the prototype in patients with COPD over a period of 1 month to ensure no adverse events, negative impacts on lung function, exercise tolerance, or quality of life. Data on user experience of the device were also collected during post-study follow-up. METHODS: A sample of 50 volunteer participants were recruited from pulmonary rehabilitation clinics within the local hospital network. The patients were clinically stable, productive, and not current or previous users of OPEP devices. Participants were invited to use a prototype disposable OPEP device daily for a period of 1 month. Pre- and post-study lung function was assessed with standard spirometry, and exercise tolerance with the 6-min-walk-test (6MWT). Quality of life was assessed using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and user experience of the prototype device evaluated using a post-study questionnaire. RESULTS: 24 Participants completed the study: 9 were female. Overall median age was 67.5 years, range 53–85 years. Lung function, 6-min walk test, and SGRQ scores showed no significant change post-study. User feedback was positive overall. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the UL-OPEP is safe to use in patients with COPD. No adverse events were recorded during the study or in the follow-up period of 2 weeks. The device did not negatively impact patients’ lung function, exercise tolerance, or quality of life during short term use (1 month), and usability feedback received was generally positive. Larger, longer duration studies will be required to evaluate efficacy. Registration The study was approved as a Clinical Investigation by the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (CRN-2209025-CI0085).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85242222021-10-20 An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study O’Sullivan, Kevin J. Power, Valerie Linnane, Barry McGrath, Deirdre Fogarty, Hilda Ryan, Martina White, Rebecca Noonan, Conor Mulloy, Eithne O’Sullivan, Leonard W. Dunne, Colum P. BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Handheld oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices have been a mainstay of treatment for patients with hypersecretory conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) since the 1970s. Current devices are reusable and require regular cleaning and disinfection to prevent harbouring potentially pathogenic organisms. Adherence to cleaning regimens for respiratory devices is often poor and in response to this, a prototype disposable OPEP device—the ‘UL-OPEP’ (University of Limerick—Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure device)—was developed to mitigate the risk of contamination by pathogens. The device was previously evaluated successfully in a group of paediatric CF patients. The aim of the current study was to initially evaluate the safety of the prototype in patients with COPD over a period of 1 month to ensure no adverse events, negative impacts on lung function, exercise tolerance, or quality of life. Data on user experience of the device were also collected during post-study follow-up. METHODS: A sample of 50 volunteer participants were recruited from pulmonary rehabilitation clinics within the local hospital network. The patients were clinically stable, productive, and not current or previous users of OPEP devices. Participants were invited to use a prototype disposable OPEP device daily for a period of 1 month. Pre- and post-study lung function was assessed with standard spirometry, and exercise tolerance with the 6-min-walk-test (6MWT). Quality of life was assessed using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and user experience of the prototype device evaluated using a post-study questionnaire. RESULTS: 24 Participants completed the study: 9 were female. Overall median age was 67.5 years, range 53–85 years. Lung function, 6-min walk test, and SGRQ scores showed no significant change post-study. User feedback was positive overall. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the UL-OPEP is safe to use in patients with COPD. No adverse events were recorded during the study or in the follow-up period of 2 weeks. The device did not negatively impact patients’ lung function, exercise tolerance, or quality of life during short term use (1 month), and usability feedback received was generally positive. Larger, longer duration studies will be required to evaluate efficacy. Registration The study was approved as a Clinical Investigation by the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (CRN-2209025-CI0085). BioMed Central 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8524222/ /pubmed/34666748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01689-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
O’Sullivan, Kevin J.
Power, Valerie
Linnane, Barry
McGrath, Deirdre
Fogarty, Hilda
Ryan, Martina
White, Rebecca
Noonan, Conor
Mulloy, Eithne
O’Sullivan, Leonard W.
Dunne, Colum P.
An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title_full An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title_fullStr An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title_full_unstemmed An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title_short An initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
title_sort initial evaluation of the safety of a disposable oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a sort-term pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34666748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01689-y
work_keys_str_mv AT osullivankevinj aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT powervalerie aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT linnanebarry aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT mcgrathdeirdre aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT fogartyhilda aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT ryanmartina aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT whiterebecca aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT noonanconor aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT mulloyeithne aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT osullivanleonardw aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT dunnecolump aninitialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT osullivankevinj initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT powervalerie initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT linnanebarry initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT mcgrathdeirdre initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT fogartyhilda initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT ryanmartina initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT whiterebecca initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT noonanconor initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT mulloyeithne initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT osullivanleonardw initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy
AT dunnecolump initialevaluationofthesafetyofadisposableoscillatingpositiveexpiratorypressuredeviceinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasorttermpilotstudy