Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES AND INTERVENTION: Bloodstream infection, the presence of viable micro-organisms in the blood, is a prevalent clinical event associated with substantial mortality. Patient outcomes may be improved when the causative micro-organism is identified quickly. We assessed the cost-effectiveness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Padraig, Hollingworth, William, Pike, Katie, Reynolds, Rosy, Stoddart, Margaret, MacGowan, Alasdair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044623
_version_ 1784585480900182016
author Dixon, Padraig
Hollingworth, William
Pike, Katie
Reynolds, Rosy
Stoddart, Margaret
MacGowan, Alasdair
author_facet Dixon, Padraig
Hollingworth, William
Pike, Katie
Reynolds, Rosy
Stoddart, Margaret
MacGowan, Alasdair
author_sort Dixon, Padraig
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES AND INTERVENTION: Bloodstream infection, the presence of viable micro-organisms in the blood, is a prevalent clinical event associated with substantial mortality. Patient outcomes may be improved when the causative micro-organism is identified quickly. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of rapid microbial identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a randomised multicentre trial (RAPIDO: RAPId Diagnosis on Outcome) assessing the impact of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry. SETTING: Adult inpatients with bloodstream infections at seven National Health Service hospital trusts in England and Wales. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Net monetary benefit, estimated as incremental costs compared with incremental 28-day survival, of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry compared with conventional identification. METHODS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive diagnosis by conventional methods of microbial identification (conventional arm) only or by MALDI-TOF spectrometry in addition to conventional identification (RAPIDO arm). RESULTS: Data from 5550 patients were included in primary analysis. Mean imputed costs in 2018/2019 prices per patient were lower by £126 in the RAPIDO arm (95% CI −£784 to £532) but the proportion of patients alive at day 28 was lower (81.4% vs 82.3%). The probability of cost-effectiveness of MALDI-TOF was <0.5 at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £20 000 and £50 000. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive MALDI-TOF diagnosis was unlikely to be cost-effective when measured as cost per death avoided at 28 days. However, the differences between arms in cost and effect were modest, associated with uncertainty and may not accurately reflect ‘real-world’ routine use of MALDI-TOF technology in this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN97107018/UKCRN 11978.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8524273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85242732021-11-02 Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial Dixon, Padraig Hollingworth, William Pike, Katie Reynolds, Rosy Stoddart, Margaret MacGowan, Alasdair BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES AND INTERVENTION: Bloodstream infection, the presence of viable micro-organisms in the blood, is a prevalent clinical event associated with substantial mortality. Patient outcomes may be improved when the causative micro-organism is identified quickly. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of rapid microbial identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a randomised multicentre trial (RAPIDO: RAPId Diagnosis on Outcome) assessing the impact of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry. SETTING: Adult inpatients with bloodstream infections at seven National Health Service hospital trusts in England and Wales. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Net monetary benefit, estimated as incremental costs compared with incremental 28-day survival, of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry compared with conventional identification. METHODS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive diagnosis by conventional methods of microbial identification (conventional arm) only or by MALDI-TOF spectrometry in addition to conventional identification (RAPIDO arm). RESULTS: Data from 5550 patients were included in primary analysis. Mean imputed costs in 2018/2019 prices per patient were lower by £126 in the RAPIDO arm (95% CI −£784 to £532) but the proportion of patients alive at day 28 was lower (81.4% vs 82.3%). The probability of cost-effectiveness of MALDI-TOF was <0.5 at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £20 000 and £50 000. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive MALDI-TOF diagnosis was unlikely to be cost-effective when measured as cost per death avoided at 28 days. However, the differences between arms in cost and effect were modest, associated with uncertainty and may not accurately reflect ‘real-world’ routine use of MALDI-TOF technology in this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN97107018/UKCRN 11978. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8524273/ /pubmed/34663649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044623 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Dixon, Padraig
Hollingworth, William
Pike, Katie
Reynolds, Rosy
Stoddart, Margaret
MacGowan, Alasdair
Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the rapido randomised controlled trial
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8524273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34663649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044623
work_keys_str_mv AT dixonpadraig costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hollingworthwilliam costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pikekatie costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reynoldsrosy costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stoddartmargaret costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macgowanalasdair costeffectivenessofrapidlaboratorybasedmassspectrometrydiagnosisofbloodstreaminfectionevidencefromtherapidorandomisedcontrolledtrial